Defund Police

“Defund the Police,” is a now a mainstream moniker. Minneapolis now has a veto-proof majority in city government to scrap the entire police department. The problem is they have no plan to replace the police with an alternative.

Read more

Passionate and Clueless

Youthful Idiots and the Illusory Truth Effect

Watching the news coverage of the ongoing riots, I couldn’t help notice a couple of things.  First, was the anger, the feral vitriol directed at the police on the scene.  It was apparent in the faces and the actions of the rioters and in the signs scattered about, hateful signs like, “Blue Lives Murder,” and “Good Cops Are Dead Cops.”

Read more

Police officer police protection

“Atlanta PD Will No Longer Chase Criminals if They Flee From Cops”

Let’s see, we’ve got multiple Democrat States with Democrat Attorney Generals stating that they are no longer going to prosecute low level crimes (e.g., urinating or defecating in public, drug usage in public ways, retail “shrinkage” up to $1,000, squatting on other peoples’ property, ignoring low level drug dealers) – that’s just a license to … Read more

Local Residents Don’t Know What to Think About the “Islam Is Right About Women” signs

A thoughtful individual in Winchester Massachusetts put up about 10 posters around town. ‘Islam Is Right About Women’.  The local residents apparently don’t know what to think about the ‘Islam Is Right About Women’ signs. The simple message has most puzzled.

Read more

Tolerance and Acceptance or Racism and Marxism

Demonstrate?

The founders, those who wrote the U.S. Constitution, understood people. They knew sometimes there is a need to complain publicly about governmental policies adversely affecting us. The American Revolution began with just such protests. The Declaration of Independence was a 28 item list of grievances against the King. Demonstrations are part of the fabric of … Read more

Crimefighters

Every once in a while, even an Ivy League law professor can surprise you by saying something sensible.  For years I’ve been quoting Alan Dershowitz of Harvard Law School on the dangers of using judicial review to circumvent the formal constitutional amendment process:

Foolish liberals who are trying to read the Second Amendment out of the Constitution by claiming it’s not an individual right or that it’s too much of a public safety hazard don’t see the danger in the big picture. They’re courting disaster by encouraging others to use the same means to eliminate portions of the Constitution they don’t like.

Recently, I was pleasantly surprised to read this from Stephen Carter at Yale Law School:

On the opening day of law school, I always counsel my first-year students never to support a law they are not willing to kill to enforce.  Usually they greet this advice with something between skepticism and puzzlement, until I remind them that the police go armed to enforce the will of the state, and if you resist, they might kill you.

Neither idea is new, but there are a lot of people who don’t seem to be willing to listen to an idea unless it comes from a ‘respectable’ source, so it’s nice to be able to quote these two.

What I’m waiting for now is an Ivy League endorsement of another idea that has been kicking around for a while, and whose time, I think, may finally have come:

Read more

Share to...