We never get tired of reporting this. Absent any of the Left’s useless anti-gun laws like expanded this, loophole that, gun-free schools, and “Red Flag” laws, NH is Still a top three-safest state in the nation.
We never get tired of reporting this. Absent any of the Left’s useless anti-gun laws like expanded this, loophole that, gun-free schools, and “Red Flag” laws, NH is Still a top three-safest state in the nation.
What do Global Warming and Gun Control have in Common? The assertion that the so-called solutions have anything at all to do with the supposed problem.
New Hampshire Democrats use every legislative session to (try and) implement Chicago-Style Gun Control for the Granite State. Chicago is their GuideStar. The template. A place where someone gets shot every few hours. And guns kill ten people every week.
New Hampshire Democrat’s played politics with mass murder. While loved-ones were still being notified in Dayton and El Paso they sent three anti-gun bills they’d sat on for 39 days to NH Gov. Chris Sununu’s desk. He vetoed them.
Yet another valid question for Debra Stevens, ye of “ravenous gun culture” infamy – how did I ever do it: get out alive after going to 25 (or much more) gun show without even a scratch on my ever delicate skin? Just like millions upon millions every year? Hmmm, those guns just LAID there – … Read more
This Tuesday Democrats in the House and Senate introduced dangerously misguided legislation. Under the guise of protecting you they moved to hold manufacturers liable for crimes committed with their products. The measure seeks to repeal legislation passed in 2005. That measure enacted protections for industry based on illegal use, abuse and resultant injury and damage. … Read more
SHOT: Paul Waldman “Because if you believe women should have a right to an abortion, that right ought to have practical meaning for everyone. We believe that the Constitution’s right of due process requires that you have legal representation if you’re accused of a crime, but we don’t say that if you can’t afford it, tough … Read more
In September of 2008, the woman you know as Democrat Presidential aspirant Kirsten Gillibrand was in love with the NRA. And she expressed that love in a letter, which the NRA kept and has shared.
Kamala got a gun. Kamala Got a gun. Her Hypocrisy’s come undone…you get the idea? Democrat Presidential aspirant and career gun-grabber Kamal Harris carries a firearm ” for probably the reason a lot of people do — for personal safety.”
I was talking with a friend recently, and we got to discussing the merits of various firearms. When I showed him the revolver that I was carrying that day, he expressed surprise that I would have a gun with me all the time.
He asked if that didn’t mean that I was ‘living in fear’. So I asked him if he had a fire extinguisher in his home. He said yes, of course. I asked if that meant that he was living in fear. Or was he just recognizing that if something unlikely but potentially terrible occurs, it’s good to be able to deal with it on your own until help arrives?
The fabricated notion that there is a separation of Church and state is sacred to the left. By which they mean, the government shall forever meddle in religious business but keep your faith to your damn selves.
Such is the keen intellect of Democrat Rep. Sherry Frost. In one tweet she unmasks the left’s flawed argument for civilian disarmament. The fantasy about good guys with guns is hers, but they’ll disarm you anyway. And if you complain they’ll take to Twitter to feed tripe to their liberal followers who want citizen-victims dependent on a … Read more
Well, most of you, anyways. My thought was, finally, some “post-modern art” that I can appreciate. https://twitter.com/XStrategiesDC/status/1077260778099666944 (H/T: Instapundit)
Oh, and one more – if it can serve as a backup generator during power outages (I’ve already got a cable for that!). Prius and guns – never thought I’d use both of those words in the same sentence. (H/T: Powerline)
The Democrats want complete civilian disarmament such that only The State has the ability to utilize Force. So they pass law after law to make that happen because SAFETY AND SECURITY! Which of course, the rest of us know will never happen. Of course, these Safety folks have no regard for the flip side: Rights and Freedom. Which, I point out, they don’t care about. And yet, this happens (reformmated and emphasis mine):
Of course, watch the meltdown when you point out that the state with the most strict gun control had it’s already high homicide rate jump up nearly 18 percent from 2014 to 2016. California, a state with every gun control imaginable, witnessed an 18 percent rise in firearm homicides from 2014 to 2016. This rise in firearm homicides comes despite the fact that Democrats, gun control groups, and the establishment media constantly claim that states with the strictest gun controls see lower rates of violence and death.
Ayup – the thought of “mice and men” streams through my head at this. And yet, it is never enough. EVAH!
By Sam Bocetta
Martial law is a subject that many people have heard about but far fewer actually understand. Truth be told, most people don’t understand just how serious of a situation martial law is or what it would entail should it ever be declared on a city-wide, state-wide, or national scale. In this article, we’ll dive into what martial law is, when and why it would be declared by the government, and what would happen if it were ever to be declared.
What Is Martial Law?
To put it simply, martial law is defined as the suspension of ordinary law and the imposition of direct government (and almost always military) control over the population. In other words, the government will act as the courts and the police all at once, and they will use the military and law enforcement to enforce whatever they should decree. If when you think of the term ‘martial law’ you also think of tanks rolling through your streets and National Guard or military units swarming in and setting up checkpoints left and right, that’s honestly not too far off from what martial law would look like.
When/Why Would Martial Law Be Declared?
Angry, violent leftists (that’s redundant) are promising to be angry and violent if they don’t get their way.
One Twitter user, claiming to be a member of the far-left militia organization, Redneck Revolt, quote tweeted (archived here) Emily saying that he “didn’t join Redneck revolt for no reason”, the implication of course being that he is “down” for armed political violence.
“…and the whole screen goes blue…the tannerite was so hot it shifted the colors..everything else was that cool in comparison…”
Well, the skies were clear, a nip of autumn was in the air (but still short sleeve weather for most), the smell of hot dogs (DANG – I forgot to bring my chili!) and hamburgers was in the air. And the firing of guns – including some sub-machine guns and a couple of belt-fed .30 (and was one a .50?) kept the background atmosphere perfect for talks about politics. Lots of subjects but especially that of the recent Primary election results and talk of what might happen in the General Election. Especially since Republican candidate for US Congress in the Second District Steve Negron and family showed up. In all, about 15 – 20 folks showed up in total – I was a bit disappointed hoping that the LFGC gun ranges might have enticed a few more folks but hey, that’s how it goes!
Oh, that image above? From commenter Allen’s SEEK IR camera attachment? The video of me
“One of the ordinary modes by which tyrants accomplish their purposes without resistance is by disarming the people and making it an offense to keep arms… The friends of a free government cannot be too watchful to overcome the dangerous tendency of the public mind to sacrifice for the sake of mere private convenience this powerful check … Read more
Recent discussions regarding the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court seem to have centered largely around two issues: guns and abortion.
Judging from my own experience, conservatives tend to be both pro-gun and anti-abortion, while progressives tend to be both anti-gun and pro-abortion:
Pro-abortion Anti-abortion Pro-gun Conservative Anti-gun Progressive
So it occurs to me that the current juxtaposition of these two issues might represent an opportunity to make, albeit informally, a historic deal linking the two.