Let me see if I have this right: SB 3, which clarifies the process by which some people — mainly non-resident college students — can vote in New Hampshire, has been set aside (temporarily, at least) by a Superior Court judge because these students might have trouble reading the new affidavit specified by the law, which apparently is written at too high a reading level.
Too high a reading level. For college students.
Specifically, the new affidavit places an ‘unreasonable and discriminatory’ burden on those students because — in the judge’s words — it ‘reads like a statute’.
So a statute can’t be a valid statute… if it reads like one? What are the alternatives?
Read more