Every Sunday, the UL’s Landrigan does a “State House Dome” wrap-up. As I scanned through the column, the word “domicile” caught my eye. No, Landrigan didn’t use it extemporarily on his own; he was quoting Dem Minority Leader Matt Wilhelm’s own words.
Articles tagged as
Domicile
Update: It’s Not “Where’s Waldo?” It’s “Where’s Dan Eaton (D-Stoddard)”?
My previous post on re-elected Dan Eaton (D-Stoddard) brought up an interesting question: where does he really live? He lists 139 Power Line Rd, Stoddard NH as his official domicile/residence as living in the NH State Representative District in which he lives.
No, No, No – It’s Not “Where’s Waldo?” It’s “Where’s Dan Eaton (D-Stoddard)”?
Yes, when the Eldest and Youngest were young, the book “Where’s Waldo” was very popular. Essentially, it was a book of illustrations with a lot of “densely drawn” pictures and the idea was to find this character, Waldo, in all kinds of situations. Sometimes it was obvious but also times when it was dang hard to find him. Find him. You know, he could be anywhere.
NH Created a ‘Right’ for “Out-Of-State Students” It Can’t Give to Actual Residents
Record out-of-state student voter turnout on November 8th may have been the straw that broke this camel’s back. Yes, I’ve been complaining about it for years and making a decent case (I think), but it’s time to get relentless.
Promoted from the Comments – Why can’t NH be like Utah when it comes to voting?
Not often do I say that NH ought to be doing something just because another State is. WE are NH – not some other State. Our culture (until the Progressives came rolling into NH in big numbers) is different, our outlook is different, our sense of volunteerism is different – we all could mention a … Read more
State Supreme Court Decision Preventing Election Integrity Reveals How Feckless and Useless the NHGOP is.
So I recently posted about Friday’s UNANIMOUS New Hampshire Supreme Court decision finding that the State Constitution somehow prohibits requiring proof of domicile to vote … which enables the Democrats to import thousands of “voters” in the weeks and days before an election, who will then vote Democrat and disappear into the political ether. The … Read more
New Hampshire’s Electile Dysfunction (ED)
For years New Hampshire Democrats have argued that refusing to let out-of-state college students vote in New Hampshire denies them their right to vote. That is a lie, but it reveals an essential truth. They are subverting your rights.
NH Election Flaw: “Extra Rights” Misrepresented as “Voting Rights” Violates “Equal Rights”
It was a Dartmouth student voter “indefinite intention” case challenging Hanover’s so-called requirement of students to affirm they were going to stay in NH after voting. A foolish question to ask a voter. They should have asked for proof of domicile. But that was not the agenda.
How About If The Voter Identification Advisory Committee Did Its Damn Job
Now might be the time to crank up some intestinal fortitude and ask for the recommendations of the VOTER IDENTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
NHDems: “NH Must Require Proof of Domicile!!!”
In an interesting turn of events, the NH Democrat Party has virtually demanded that the State institute rigid requirements for proof of domicile before a person can vote receive “life-saving” medical treatment.
Taking Advantage of Watered Down NH Election Laws Regarding Legal Residence – One Simple Test.
Take a look at the NH AG’s advice from their web site: “How do I establish domicile/residence in New Hampshire?
Is Shannon Chandley’s MA Resident Campaign Manager – Katherine E. McMurray – Going to Vote in NH Too?
436 Walnut St. Manchester is the place several transient campaign workers flop at night. The Coalition of NH Taxpayers has identified two so far, Lavanya Prabhakar and Vedika Gopal. Neither has contacted us to prove their domicile status.
Voting in NH: A Physical Presence – While You Are Back Home
Remember when we caught some vote thieves at State Senator Martha Fuller-Clark’s Voter Fraud Motel in Portsmouth’s residential district? Let’s re-cap because that incident is still relevant, as we will see.
New Hampshire Attorney General Rewrites Voting Law (Again) to Help Elect Democrats (Again)
So … if you regularly read Granite Grok, which I encourage you to do, you know the New Hampshire Attorney General recently rejected a request by the New Hampshire GOP to opine that college students who returned to their actual homes and are “remote learning” in New Hampshire are NOT eligible to vote in the … Read more
Who Can Vote? for the One-Hundredth Time…
Regarding the new, last-minute statement from the NH AG’s Office that makes the claim any students from colleges in New Hampshire can vote here – it’s false! To be a student at a state college such as UNH, Keene State, Plymouth, or any state school there is an issue of domicile – one’s legal residence.
Time For A Voter Fraud History Lesson, NH
As we see an actual arrest and extradition of an out-of-state voter by the NH Attorney General’s Office it pays to look back at some old, but very relevant articles from the CNHT website. The facts are simple.
Project Veritas and James O’Keefe
Project Veritas and James O’Keefe steamrolled the Election Law Division of the NH Attorney General’s Office. This office has been whitewashing voter fraud for twenty years I know of. They use a series of tricks The Coalition of NH Taxpayers has been documenting since 2000.
Dartmouth Student Resigns NH House Seat – State Won’t Cover Commute Mileage From his Home in California?
Garrett Muscatel, I am told, was a great guy. That, from some Republicans who knew him. And I’m happy to hear it. But he took a NH House seat from an actual resident by being allowed to claim his temporary dorm housing as proof of permanent residency.
Democrat Challenge to NH Voting Requirement Collapses as Dartmouth Students Drop Lawsuit
New Hampshire Democrats have been telling anyone that will listen that Republicans are suppressing student votes. That was always a lie, as we’ve explained here as recently as this morning, but they took their latest tirade to court anyway and lost. Or should I say, had to walk away?