State Supreme Court Decision Preventing Election Integrity Reveals How Feckless and Useless the NHGOP is.

So I recently posted about Friday’s UNANIMOUS New Hampshire Supreme Court decision finding that the State Constitution somehow prohibits requiring proof of domicile to vote … which enables the Democrats to import thousands of “voters” in the weeks and days before an election, who will then vote Democrat and disappear into the political ether.

The decision is obviously based on politics, not law. To repeat, if one is actually domiciled in New Hampshire … as opposed to being a transient campaign worker or volunteer … it is NOT BURDENSOME to provide proof of domicile.

The GOP reaction to this obviously political decision is pathetic.

“While this outcome is not ideal, it does give the Legislature a renewed sense of purpose as we work together to ensure New Hampshire’s elections remain fair with open transparency. We will continue working on legislation reforms to strengthen and uphold the integrity of our elections,” [House Speaker Sherman] Packard said.

“Not ideal”? That’s Packard’s reaction to a decision that green-lights voter-fraud … that allows out-of-staters to flood into New Hampshire on election-day and steal the votes of legal voters? “Not ideal”? That’s it … “not ideal”?  Packard is a complete disaster and a total embarrassment as Speaker.

What universe or alternative reality is Packard living in to believe that the Democrats intend to “work together to … strengthen and uphold the integrity of our elections”? Shermy, buddy, the Democrats in the New Hampshire legislature are Communists. They seek power by any means necessary. They could care less about election integrity.

And here is the equally pathetic response of  House Election Law Chairman Barbara Griffin:

“This decision is disappointing in light of the contrary finding from the Supreme Court of the United States in Brnovich v. DNC that the mere requirement of proving an individual has the constitutional standing to vote in an election is not unduly burdensome,” Griffin said. “We will analyze the details of this case as we chart our path to ensuring our elections are fair, transparent and honest.”

She’s “disappointed.” The New Hampshire Supreme Court green-lights voter-fraud and she’s “disappointed.” Every GOP in the legislature, ESPECIALLY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE IN CHARGE OF ELECTION LAWS, should be outraged. But she’s “disappointed.”

But have no fear she’s going to “analyze the details” of the decision and “chart [a new] path.” Barb, sweetie, it was a political decision. And this sorry excuse for a supreme court will strike down the next law … and the one after that … and the one after that. Because you and your fellow “GOP” are afraid to fight for us, to stand up to the court, but instead just reflexively bend the knee.

And the person who could have avoided this debacle … who wasted three Supreme Court nominations had this to say:

“It’s disappointing that these commonsense reforms were not supported by our Supreme Court, but we have to respect their decision and I encourage the Legislature to take the court’s opinion into account and continue working to make commonsense reforms to ensure the integrity of New Hampshire’s elections.”

So thousands of us are going to have our votes stolen in the next election thanks to an undeniably political decision, and the best the Sun-King can do is “disappointed.” Pathetic. Absolutely pathetic.

The Sun-King will go to the mat for his precious business tax cuts, for corporations that want to indoctrinate CRT to their employees, for his so-called “emergency powers” … but he will not fight for us even a little when it matters the most.