The last post on this topic (GraniteGrok’s Right To Know to the State of NH on the non-State biz use of the State’s network: political commenting) effectively ended on these notes:
- “what did they know and when did they know it?“
- and “they did know it all and they knew it when the packets went through the system.”
Which leads up to the next important question:“…can the State live up to its own personnel policies in this area?”
This actually breaks down into two parts:
- Can the State technically actually do what the policies say imply based on the results sent to us from our Right To Know request?
- And if the State can technically support its policies – are they actually using those technical tools and if not, why not?
Now, I would be remiss to not point out that part of RTK for our calculus is still outstanding – Mr. Richard de Seve’s outbound (of the NH State domain) emails which the DES RTK guy has told me, multiple times now, is in process:
Request 5:
5. Any and all of Mr. de Seve’s emails that were outbound of the NH State’s domain and whose destination were other than for another NH State employee.
Response to 5:
All known emails have been collected and are currently being reviewed to determine 1) whether they are responsive to your request and 2) whether they are subject to any privilege or statutory exemption under RSA 91-4. Responsive, non-exempt emails will be provided upon completion of this review.
So, this needs to be fit into the picture when they arrive. In the mean time, there is more to review and our interim conclusion at the end…
