The Sentinel asked why Democrat Dan Eaton, who resigned from the NH House due to ethics charges, why he was running. Well, the guy seems to have a pair (if nothing else): “To restore transparency, civility and fairness to the institution“
Riiiiiiight. If I remember right, he resigned when he became under an investigation of a “lapse in ethics” – does this mean he’ll be “transparent” as to the charges AND why he resigned? And the stories are that he wasn’t all that civil about things, either. So, what IS fairness, Mr. Dan? And why now is a better time for you to be back in the NH House, again, now that you are a “resignee”? A mailer that went out to folks in that area was forwarded to me (note: you HAVE to like the name of the PAC – “the “Do You Know Who I AM” PAC. And that’s his brother, the Chair??):
Well, seems like Dan might have been the bad boy, eh? The PAC goes on to list the Top 5 Reasons To REJECT Dan Eaton for State Representative:

Four years ago was historic. The first black president was inaugurated. For the first time, a former First Lady became the Secretary of State. It was the first time the Democrats controlled the Oval Office, House of Representatives, and the Senate since the nineties. It was the first time I stopped yelling at the news and rolled my lazy butt off the couch and started actively participating in the political discourse (okay, that part’s not really historic).
