Jeanne Shaheen: DO as I say, not as I do…

Jeanne Shaheen.Al Gore canoe

On her campaign website, Jeanne Shaheen puts forth, in a style quite similar to that of one of her ideological comrades, Chicken Little, dire warnings of the consequences of not addressing global warming immediately. Says Jeanne,

"A new energy policy is an environmental, national security and economic imperative, and there is no time to waste.”

Got that? She says THERE IS NO TIME TO WASTE. You can almost feel the panic laid before visitors to the website:

Reversing global warming is an economic, environmental and health imperative for New Hampshire. If we don’t act to reverse global warming, New Hampshire’s snow season is projected to shrink by almost 50 percent by mid-century, severely impacting our skiing and snowmobile industries. Increasing temperatures also will negatively impact fall foliage tourism, the hunting and fishing industries, and maple sugar production. Our small but precious coastline faces substantial increases in the extent and frequency of coastal flooding, erosion, and property damage. Global warming worsens air quality, putting more stress on people with heart conditions and respiratory conditions, like asthma, and New Hampshire already has one of the highest rates of childhood asthma in the country.

Bad stuff, eh? She then spews the usual blather one expects from politicians choosing this route to scare voters into casting their vote for them, rather than the opponent that "obviously" works against the planet:

Jeanne Shaheen believes it’s long past time that Washington take action. Jeanne Shaheen supports the goal of cutting carbon emissions by 80 percent by 2050…

So you’d imagine someone so committed to such drastic measures would be leading the way in all regards, right? Come on, it’s JEANNE SHAHEEN we’re talking about, here. You know about politicians of her ilk: "fine for thee, but not for me…" In the same vein as her famous canoe trip with Al Gore– you remember, the one where the river dams were opened during a drought while she was the governor so that she and AlGore could have their picture taken in a canoe— comes the latest, provided by regular ‘Grok reader Peter G:

Read more

Self evident truths, abuses, and usurpations…

As we celebrate the Fourth of July, it is worth a few minutes to reflect on what the birth of this “great experiment”, known as America really means. Consider these words from The Declaration of Independence: “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator … Read more

Grant Bosse on the Second Amendment

By Grant Bosse By upholding an individual right to keep and bear arms, overturning the oppressive handgun ban in Washington D.C., but leaving room for local and state regulations, the court has put Congress and state legislatures front and center. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is already pushing for strict gun control restrictions "near schools," without saying how wide such a zone … Read more

Meet the New Press Podcast featuring John Stephen, facts about the oil industry, and the last word on the Wolfeboro flag flap…

The MTNP Podcast page is brought to you by: .                                                                               Meet The New Press Radio at the speed of the Blogosphere! WEMJ 1490 Saturdays 9am-11am (EDT) Streaming Live! To play (or "stream") a clip now, just click on it.  To download it to your PC, right click on it and tell the process where to … Read more

Bloggers Conference Call: Oil & Gas– Developing our domestic sources.

 

refinery.oil rig
oil derrick….money fistoil

 

In addition to politics, I am very interested in energy and things related. I deal with energy-producers in my "real" job on a daily basis, I am a member of my town’s Energy Committee, and of course, like most Americans these days, above all, I am mostly interested in energy at the moment due to its escalating cost. When you think about it, energy affects pretty much everything. Along with food and water, plentiful energy is among the necessities of life. After all, it takes energy to GET the food and water…

Thursday afternoon, I participated in a Bloggers’ Conference Call hosted by our friends at the American Petroleum Institute. The biggest point I came away with is that there is much more to the topic of energy, its supply, and the exploration of, than you could imagine. While some politicians rail against "big oil" day in and day out, the fact is, "big oil" is an extremely complex industry made up of great numbers of skilled Americans, held together in a logistical system that is undoubtedly as intricate and complicated as anything one would find in almost any other human endeavor on the planet.

If you believe that "big oil" is nothing more than wealthy fatcats that work for a single handful of well-known corporate symbols like Exxon or Mobil, etcetera, hanging out all day in large, air conditioned buildings scheming ways of taking our money, you need to think about these matters for more than a nanosecond. And consider the whole concept of energy and its impact on our individual lives. It is my belief that without affordable, portable sources of energy, we would all but lose the freedoms we hold dear. The freedom to travel about when YOU want to, and go almost anywhere you want in short order, is nothing to take lightly. The freedom to live in your own home and rely on yourself to stay warm in the winter and cool in the summer is about as American as it gets. Are we ready to live in Soviet-style housing to stay warm? I think not. When the refrigerator replaced the icebox  and became widely available and affordable to ordinary people, it was hailed as an advance directly responsible for the improvement of peoples’ health through better, safer diets. Without energy, there would be no such thing.

Anyway, during the call, there was much discussion about the lengthy, expensive, and risky process involved with the successful discovery and delivery of oil and gas to the marketplace. We also learned about how some areas presently off-limits contain already existing wells constructed before banning new offshore exploration and drilling came into vogue. These can be quickly brought into production.

One of the people participating was David Mica, the executive director of the Florida Petroleum Council. I was particularly intrigued by recent news of the attitude change in Florida on the part of Governor Crist and wondered if it reflected a shift shared by many Floridians. Here is the transcript of our exchange at the beginning of the call:

Read more

McCain has an energy plan. Obama? His is the same one used by Jimmy Carter. Remember him?

Seabrook.oil platform
McCain.windmills
SECURING OUR ENERGY FUTURE
For Immediate Release 
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 
 
Today, John McCain outlined the growing energy challenges facing our Nation and the need to reform our energy sector. Over the coming weeks, John McCain will lead a dialogue with the American people about their energy concerns, and the goals that we must set now to end our dependence on oil.
· John McCain Will Break From The Failed Energy Policies Of The Past And Lead A Great National Effort To Achieve Energy Security For A Peaceful And Prosperous America. Working with the leading energy experts inside and outside of the sector, John McCain will work to design and implement the right energy policies that will effectively govern our energy future by enhancing our economic stability, national security and environmental protection.

Our Growing Energy Challenges

The United States And Our Economy Are Overly Dependent On Foreign Sources Of Oil. America currently imports approximately two thirds of the oil it needs. Petroleum products (including diesel and jet fuel) provide 94 percent of our transportation fuel and over 60 percent of that transportation fuel comes from foreign sources. We have doubled our imports of foreign oil in the last 30 years which is a clear failure of leadership from both political parties, the Administration and Congress.

American Dependence On Foreign Sources Of Oil Contributes Wealth To Undemocratic Governments, That Are Both Supportive Of, And Vulnerable To Terrorist Attacks. Oil revenues are enriching the enemies of the United States. Iran alone receives more than $66 billion a year from oil sales. By relying upon oil from the Middle East, we not only provide wealth to the sponsors of terror — we provide high-value targets to the terrorists themselves.

Increased Oil Prices Effect More Than Just Fuel For Our Cars. In recent months, the world has seen an overall increase in the price of food. This is a direct result of increased fuel prices for transportation and the redirecting of grains and feed towards ethanol for our fuel supply.

America’s Increased Dependence On Foreign Sources Of Oil Is Resulting In An Increase In Our Trade Deficit. Since 1973, the United States has gone from importing 6 million barrels of oil a day to 12 million barrels per day with petroleum payments comprising 41 percent of the U.S. trade deficit ($293 billion of $759 billion).

America Needs To Reform Its Energy Portfolio To Rely On Both New And Proven Sources Of Energy. The United States needs to advance its research on clean, alternative energy sources like solar, wind and clean coal, while at the same time recommit itself to expanding the use of nuclear power.

Breaking Our Dependence On Foreign Sources Of Oil

 

Read more

Mark your calendar: POW/MIA Freedon Ride Thursday

“Summer’s here and the time is right for dancing in the streets. There’ll be swinging swaying laughing, playing…” 

Freedom Rally 07

Freedom Rally ’07

In addition, there will be some serious business going on as well. Because, as we set about enjoying summer, we can’t forget that the only reason we’re able to do so is due to the efforts and sacrifices on the part of the American soldier and his/her family. Be they past or present, whether at sea, land, or in the air, at the end of it all, it is those who serve that first attained, and now protect and defend, the freedoms we take for granted. Republican or Democrat, there is no denying that quite often during our Nation’s history we were threatened and, whether everyone agreed to the true nature of the threat and the appropriate response or not, there was the American soldier, fulfilling the assigned duty.

Whether the conscripts of days past, or the volunteers of today, we should all be thankful for their service, and, most important of all, must never forget those who did not return. To do otherwise is to dishonor their ultimate sacrifice on behalf of the rest of us. Just imagine… in a way, they died so that we might live. Who else, save for occasional random heroic acts of individuals in some situation and, of course, Christ Himself, has done this?

It is for these men and women that we must take time from swinging, swaying, and laughing. Oh, we should be in the streets, but not dancing. Oh no—it’s time to take to the streets with a clear purpose and cause: remembering those who haven’t come home. And I’m not just talking about those who died… I’m also talking about those who literally have not yet come home—those that are both prisoners of war, and missing in action. While death is hard enough, just imagine being a family member of a soldier who is lost altogether—not knowing whether their loved one is indeed passed on, or maybe out there, somewhere… alive.

It is for these people, both soldier and family, that we take to the streets this summer. For those held prisoner, or missing: known by most people as America’s POW/MIAs.

Freedom Rally 07

This year marks the 20th anniversary of America’s longest and oldest continuous weekly POW/MIA vigil, held every Thursday night at New Hampshire’s official memorial at Meredith’s Hesky Park. Additionally, this summer marks the 15th anniversary of the Freedom Ride. Started in 1994 by a local motorcycle club, the ride is held in conjunction with the POW/MIA Vigil as a way of bringing both attention and participation to the issue.  It was modeled after “Rolling Thunder” which takes place every Memorial Day in Washington D.C.

 

Read more

GraniteGrok Q & A Series: Jeb Bradley

Jeb Bradley.Jeb Bradley

Former Congressman Jeb Bradley is featured in today’s GraniteGok Congressional Candidate Q & A Series. He is one of the two Republicans seeking the nomination for NH’s 1st Congressional District.  As with the others that have participated, we thank Jeb for taking time to answer these questions and further continue to appreciate his acknowledgment of the growing importance of the readers here in the blogosphere. Jebb Joined us on MTNP radio this past Saturday. Click here to visit the podcast page and listen.

Jeb’s responses are below and as always, feel free to leave a comment…

===============================================================
QUESTIONS

1. If you could ask General Petraeus any question, but only one question, what would it be?

Jeb: General Petraeus: Thank you for your exemplary service to our nation.  Would you describe please the progress that is being made in Iraq stabilizing that nation and leading to political reconciliation and do you have the resources necessary to complete that mission? 

2. Do you favor Oil recovery in the newly found fields in Montana & the Dakotas?  Jeb: Yes

• Drilling in ANWR?  Jeb: YES

• Drilling in the deep waters off Florida and in the Gulf of Mexico?   Jeb: Yes

• Creating a fast track process to license and build new nuclear plants?  Jeb: YES

Jeb adds: Our nation needs to reduce our dependence of foreign imports by exploring in areas that have previously been off limits which includes ANWR. We also need to permit additional refineries, develop clean coal technology, and license new nuclear plants. Additionally our nation needs to develop renewable energy which should be done by creating incentives in the marketplace rather than direct government subsidies.

3. In the area of healthcare, are you in favor of:

• Giving tax credits for policies to individuals / families as well as businesses? 

Jeb: YES

• Allow policies to be purchased across state lines?  Jeb: YES

• Allow individuals to buy lower cost policies by "unhooking" legal mandates  

Jeb: YES

Jeb adds: In order to lower the cost of health care we must reduce frivolous lawsuits that force doctors to practice defensive medicine. Small businesses should be able to pool together across state lines to get large discounts from insurers. Health savings accounts should be expanded. These are all provisions I have voted for. Additionally health care costs should be transparent and fully deductable. Individuals ought to be allowed to purchase health care policies outside their home states if they so choose. All of these provisions will lower the cost of health care. I do not support a Canadian style government run health care system.

4. British Prime Minister Brown said that the US must give up the idea of absolute sovereignty in order to better cooperate in the global community.  Agree or disagree, and why?

Read more

GraniteGrok Q & A Series: Senator Sununu

Senator Sununu meets with military families early last year. (GG file photo)

Senator John E. Sununu was kind enough to participate in GraniteGok’s Congressional Candidate Q & A Series. We thank him for taking time from his busy schedule to do so, and further appreciate his acknowledgement of us and our readers here in the Blogosphere…

As promised, here are his answers as provided to us. Feel free to leave your thoughts in the "comments" section…

===============================================================
QUESTIONS

1. If you could ask General Petraeus any question, but only one question, what would it be?

Sen Sununu response: Has Congress provided you with the necessary resources to support your troops, enable them to complete their work, and bring them home safely as soon as possible?

2. Do you favor Oil recovery in the newly found fields in Montana & the Dakotas?

• Drilling in ANWR?
• Drilling in the deep waters off Florida and in the Gulf of Mexico?
• Creating a fast track process to license and build new nuclear plants?

Sen Sununu response: Conservation and support for renewable energy is very important, but reducing our dependence on foreign energy requires allowing domestic production of oil and gas and minimizing unnecessary delays in building nuclear power plants.

3. In the area of healthcare, are you in favor of:

• Giving tax credits for policies to individuals / families as well as businesses?
• Allow policies to be purchased across state lines?
• Allow individuals to buy lower cost policies by "unhooking" legal mandates

Sen. Sununu response: I have voted for legislation allowing small businesses to join forces to negotiate better rates and strongly support legislation to give individuals a full tax deduction for all health care costs, and allow insurance policies to be purchased across state lines.

4. British Prime Minister Brown said that the US must give up the idea of absolute sovereignty in order to better cooperate in the global community.  Agree or disagree, and why?

Sen. Sununu response: No. United States sovereignty is not something to be conceded to any other government or international organization.

Read more

Defending the New Hampshire Advantage Pledge unveiled Tuesday

. Manchester Mayor Frank Guinta and GOP gubernatorial hopeful Senator Joe Kenney at yesterday’s New Hampshire Advantage Coalition’s official rollout of their "Defending the New Hampshire Advantage Pledge" (photos by GraniteGrok) The pushback begins… Yesterday morning in Concord at the Legislative Office Building, putting the proverbial money where his mouth is, Manchester Mayor Frank Guinta, along with … Read more

Guest Blog Post by Grant Bosse: Energy

Congress Needs New Energy and a New Energy Policy by Grant Bosse As oil prices reach record highs, gasoline and diesel prices make every fill-up painful, and New Hampshire continues to pay the highest electricity prices in the nation, we have to ask ourselves; why does Congress keep making energy more expensive? Last year’s Energy … Read more

What a ride! It’s Meet the New Press radio.

Starting Saturday morning at 9 am! . ….              .Pat Hynes                                  Skip Murphy                                  Doug Lambert . As usual, this week’s broadcast version of GraniteGrok and AnkleBitingPundits brings an array of items and guests for your consideration– ALL STARTING AT 9AM! As always, thanks to the technical wizardry and analytical skills of Skip, if you … Read more

Spending Cap Pledge Debuts in Lakes Region

tax bill

In what is most likely the first public action involving the recently unveiled spending cap pledge promoted by the New Hampshire Advantage Coalition, members of the Gilford Municipal Budget Committee found themselves voting on a motion to adopt such a cap at its initial meeting of the 2009 FY budget season. As reported by the Citizen (Laconia) newspaper,

Budget committee member Doug Lambert has challenged the elected officials in Gilford with imposing a voluntary tax cap on governmental spending.

The idea for a voluntary tax cap came out of an initiative started by the New Hampshire Advantage Coalition. The reason the coalition began the challenge is two-fold: first to lower the burden on New Hampshire families and secondly to encourage government to maximize the value of every dollar.

Lambert took the pledge and modified it slightly, though the principle is the same.

The Gilford Pledge to Defend the New Hampshire Advantage reads, "I believe that low taxes are the result of low spending. I believe that a government can only be fair to its taxpayers when it is actively looking for ways to run more efficiently. I hereby pledge: Not to vote for — or lend my support to — any budget raising government spending that causes taxes to be raised more than the rate of inflation, as it is defined by the Consumer Price Index-Urban, plus new construction growth."

[snip]

"I printed it; I signed it; I will adhere to it. That will be my actions on the committee," promised Lambert.

Skip Murphy, a budget committee member and chair of the Gilford Republican Town Committee, also signed and promised to follow the voluntary tax cap pledge.

Recognize those two guys? While it turned out we weren’t able to convince a majority of the Budcom to adopt the voluntary cap, besides myself and Skip, two other members agreed to conduct all of our actions in line with the "cap." We will be working on a spreadsheet program in order to keep a running account of the budget process, identifying exactly how much the school, town, and (hopefully) county portions can increase under such a cap.

Please read the whole Citizen article, as reporter Cutter Mitchell does an excellent job in his reporting of what went down last night. It’s my belief that this is but the first salvo in what will be a rising movement here in the Granite State as we seek to preserve and protect our special "New Hampshire Advantage".

Below is the pledge as I submitted, signed, to the chair of our committee. I shared a copy with every member, and will be presenting them to the school board and selectmen for them to sign as well.

 

Read more

“Well, uh… you see Chief, a funny thing happened on the way back to the station…”

[UPDATED] The NH Union Leader has the NH AG’s full statement regarding this matter, determining there was no wrongdoing involved. I’m glad of that. But I stand by the points I raised in the post. As a commenter at the UL site wrote,

I don’t think anybody expected this to be a criminal matter. Negligence? A judgment call. It’s not surprising that it went the way it did.

But didn’t these guys go a bit overboard in thinking that they could use private property for their training exercise without getting permission from the owner? The Constitution is pretty clear about this.
– Bruce, New London

=====================================================================

The story about the cop shooting in Concord has been simmering just below the radar since word first came out. Here’s how I view this, being an ordinary citizen exposed to the available media…

First, I heard on NewsNine that a cop got shot during the night in a bank by another cop, but his bulletproof vest saved him.

The next day, reading the Union Leader newspaper, I learned it was accidental.

"This is not a case where a police officer discharged their weapon in pursuit of a suspect or in the midst of an arrest or something like that," Strelzin said.

Four Concord police officers were inside the building when one officer’s handgun discharged, striking a fellow officer in the chest. Strelzin would not say why the officers were in the building.

"I can tell you the only individuals involved were those four officers," he said. Their names are being withheld while the investigation continues.

At this point, I thought, well, what exactly were they doing? Maybe something like this…

cops training?

At work, tongues flapped about a cop "accidently" shooting another cop. Everyone was asking the same question I had intially thought– "How does that happen?" Someone mentioned this guy:

 

Barney

He was only half-joking. So it went. What were they doing at 4:30 in the morning in an unfinished bank?

Another morning, and I’m getting dressed for the day, watching NewsNine again… On comes a report with an interview with some guy that either owns or is running the project at the building the cops were in during the "mishap." He says he has no clue what the cops were doing in the building, that nothing appeared amiss. The reporter notes the Concord police still aren’t saying what happened. Hmmm. You can imagine the watercooler discussion THAT day, as almost everyone I work with saw the report.

And then nothing for a few days. The conspiracists among our bunch began to surmise a coverup was in the works. The local rumor mill coughed up a story that perhaps something really bad was going down. "One thing’s for sure," one local wag said, "We’ll never find out what really happened." And everyone agreed, even those of us not so prone to believing wild conspiracy tales.

Well, nearly a week has gone by, and finally, we find out some of the "facts." Guess what? It was simply a training mission accident the whole time! As reported by the Concord Monitor,

Read more

Gore assaults reason… again.

You just knew this was coming… The BMI reports Using tragedy to advance an agenda has been a strategy for many global warming activists, and it was just a matter of time before someone found a way to tie the recent Myanmar cyclone to global warming. Former Vice President Al Gore in an interview on … Read more

Meet the New Press radio. Come and get your fill. We’re 100% domestic, always a good value, and totally tax-free!

MTNP: A real gas! Starting Saturday morning at 9 am! . ….              .Pat Hynes                                  Skip Murphy                                  Doug Lambert . As usual, this week’s broadcast version of GraniteGrok and AnkleBitingPundits brings an array of items and guests for your consideration– ALL STARTING AT 9AM! As always, thanks to the technical wizardry and analytical skills … Read more

Why?

What WOULD Thomas Jefferson think? . What happens when a group of twenty US citizens celebrates the ideas of Jefferson by silently dancing by his memorial for ten minutes? Arrests. And we think we’re a liberty-loving people?  

Biting the hands that feed. SEIU on the attack…

SEIU

SEIU

For the nearly two years that GraniteGrok has been open for business, we have written a fair amount about the ongoing union assault on successful American companies like Wal-Mart. We have covered both the philisophical questions raised by such tactics in a free-market society as well as exactly who comprises the instigators behind such ongoing attacks. The common thread is, of course, labor unions. In their quest to maintain power and relevance, they will do almost anything, including destroy the very companies that employ them– biting the hand that feeds.

Leading the charge these days are the henchmen of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). As reported by Matt Lewis writing at Townhall.com, the practices being used in the advancement of their cause are likely to invoke the images among many folks of the classic "union thug" from some bygone era:

Just this past weekend, the SEIU sent hundreds of "members" to disrupt a labor conference in Michigan.  They were apparently shoving people to the ground and apparently even went so far as to inflict a head wound on a retired woman (story here, video). In California, they are stalking nurses in a rival union by going to their homes with cameras — and even made a YouTube video of themselves doing it.

A  California judge even issued a restraining order against them.

What some people might not know is that in addition to routine thuggery, the SEIU has found new ways to disrupt, cajole, and otherwise shakedown their intended targets. Obviously, when physically beating up corporate execs as opposed to hapless commoners and lowly workers, there comes an added risk to the unionists: deeper pockets to pay for legal actions. As reported in Friday’s Washington Post,

Big labor is relying more on guile and theatrics than blunt force to attack the ascendancy of a new form of corporate ownership: private equity.

And tactics often get personal. Union allies staged a satire outside buyout king Henry Kravis’s lavish Long Island home, asking passersby to sign a petition giving him a break on his property taxes. Weeks later, protesters in business suits sneaked into a private-equity conference at the Waldorf-Astoria hotel in New York, where Carlyle Group co-founder David M. Rubenstein was giving a speech. They sought to shame him with a banner that read: "Why does he pay taxes at a lower rate than the hotel’s doorman?"

Then on Halloween, union members wearing Rubenstein masks paraded in front of Carlyle’s offices, handing out Sugar Daddy suckers.

The unorthodox protests are part of a campaign by the Service Employees International Union and its allies to position themselves as a check on what they regard as a new economic order, one dominated by the big private buyout firms.

And what is their problem with this "new economic order?"

Read more

Butts, Bulbs, and the Family Truckster. And we claim to be a liberty loving people?

Family Truckster

Satire.

truckster redux?

Reality, as dictated by government?

Smoked any good cigarettes, lately? No, really—have you smoked any GOOD cigarettes lately? If you’re like most smokers I know here in New Hampshire, the honest answer is “no.” While I am not a smoker myself, I admit I do have a bit of sympathy for the plight of those who do. By now many of us have grown accustomed to seeing hapless smokers, thanks to government rules and regulations, huddled outdoors in the elements seeking to gain some small amount of pleasure in the simple act of having a smoke.

It was bad enough to have to watch them relegated to standing in the wind, the rain, and the cold as if being punished. Now, again thanks to the government, it’s even worse, as the damn things don’t even stay lit– even in the absence of foul weather. As Granite State smokers all know, beginning last October, New Hampshire joined several other states in requiring that all cigarettes sold be self-extinguishing or “fire safe.” Such cigarettes are wrapped in special ultra-thin paper with “speed bump” bands that inhibit burning unless a smoker draws in air. What this does is basically require a smoker quickly hyperventilate it down to the butt, or continuously re-light numerous times for a single cigarette.

I don’t know of a single person who smokes that actually thinks this was a good idea. But what the consumer thinks is of no matter to an ever-growing nanny-state government. “But Doug, it will save lives! Why, according to statistics, unattended cigarettes cause somewhere in the neighborhood of seven to eight hundred deaths per year nationally! Surely you care about them?” That may be, but what is that number compared to the total number of persons that do smoke? And of those that do suffer and die from such tragedies, how many will simply find some other way to be careless enough to cause themselves harm? For these, statistically a small percentage of the total group that chooses to smoke cigarettes, we are mandating products that would never be wanted by its consumers, given a choice?

Retailers here in the “Live Free or Die State” that are found to be violating the law face civil fines of up to $1,000 per sale depending on the number of cigarettes sold. Selling products people would choose to buy, given their druthers? VERBOTEN!

Read more

Share to...