Dear Santa. All I want for Christmas is some “pre-emption”. And some ammo…

Put me on this guy’s Christmas card list… WASHINGTON, Dec. 14 /U.S. Newswire/ — An armed sleigh-borne Santa Claus zeroes in on Iranian and North Korean nuclear missiles in a postal Christmas card sent this month to government officials and others. . John M. Snyder mailed the cards to the president, vice president, Cabinet and … Read more

President Bush talks Iraq on the radio this week.

In this week’s radio address, President Bush discusses his meeting with the leader of Iraq:
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. I returned home this week from a visit to the Middle East. On my trip, I met with Prime Minister Maliki of Iraq to discuss how we can improve the situation on the ground in his country and help the Iraqis build a lasting democracy.
.
My meeting with Prime Minister Maliki was our third since he took office six months ago. With each meeting, I’m coming to know him better, and I’m becoming more impressed by his desire to make the difficult choices that will put his country on a better path. During our meeting, I told the Prime Minister that America is ready to make changes to better support the unity government of Iraq, and that several key principles will guide our efforts.
.
First, the success of Prime Minister Maliki’s government is critical to success in Iraq. His unity government was chosen through free elections in which nearly 12 million Iraqis cast their ballots in support of democracy. Our goal in Iraq is to strengthen his democratic government and help Iraq’s leaders build a free nation that can govern itself, sustain itself, and defend itself — and is an ally in the war on terror.
This really is key. We need a friendly government over there- and the days of picking some dictatorial strong-man type are over. We need friends, but they must be legitimate leaders ultimately chosen by their people. The President continues…
Second, the success of the Iraqi government depends on the success of the Iraqi security forces. The training of Iraqi security forces has been steady, yet we both agreed that we need to do more, and we need to do it faster. The Prime Minister wants to show the people who elected him that he’s willing to make the hard decisions necessary to provide security.
.
To do that, he needs larger and more capable Iraqi forces under his control, and he needs them quickly. By helping Iraq’s elected leaders get the Iraqi forces they need, we will help Iraq’s democratic government become more effective in fighting the terrorists and other violent extremists, and in providing security and stability, particularly in Baghdad.
If the government stays unable to provide for basic security, the people will look elsewhere. This is what causes the rise in the power and prestige of militias and warlords. Authorizing the destruction of Mookie Al Sadr and his army would be a great place to start.
Third, success in Iraq requires strong institutions that will stand the test of time and hardship. Our goal in Iraq is to help Prime Minister Maliki build a country that is united, where the rule of law prevails and the rights of minorities are respected. The Prime Minister made clear that splitting his country into parts is not what the Iraqi people want and that any partition of Iraq would lead to an increase in sectarian violence.
.
Security in Iraq requires sustained action by the Iraqi security forces, yet in the long term, security in Iraq hinges on reconciliation among Iraq’s different ethnic and religious communities. And the Prime Minister has committed his government to achieving that goal.

Read more

Meanwhile, back at the new world war…

Did you catch this one? Y-Net News.com reported on November 13th-Monday, According to the Iranian media Monday, Iranian President Mahoud Ahmadinejad declared that Israel was destined to ‘disappearance and destruction’ at a council meeting with Iranian ministers. . “The western powers created the Zionist regime in order to expand their control of the area. This … Read more

You can [cut and] run, but you can’t hide!

Meanwhile, back at the war… . While evrybody’s attention is fixed on Tuesday’s elections, the machinations of the new world war continue. John Keegan writes this chilling observation in the Telegraph.com (UK): There will soon be another war in the Middle East, this time a renewal of the conflict between the Israel Defence Force (IDF) … Read more

Tag, dodge ball and jihad.

This is my weekly column for today’s Laconia Daily Sun.

Exercising the First    by Doug Lambert
Tag, dodge ball and jihad.

At what point will we ban childhood itself? While I’m all in favor of modern innovations like good helmets for children (and adults- if they choose) when bike riding and skiing, more and more lately, the notion of “child safety” just gets plain silly.
.
Consider the latest playground rules at an elementary school just down in nearby Massachusetts. The Sun Chronicle (www.thesunchronicle.com) reports in an article by Susan LaHoud that the eternal childhood game of “Tag is now out during recess at Willett Elementary School.” That’s right- students will no longer be able to participate in the improvised game that has more likely than not been played by young humans since the children of Adam and Eve first set foot on the Earth. The story reports that tag will join other fabled games like touch football and dodge-ball on the growing list of games prohibited during recess. Apparently, dodge-ball is too much of an “exclusionary and dangerous game.”
.
The Sun Chronicle notes that such rules are not unique to this one school. There is a “growing movement against traditional games played by young children in school gymnasiums and playgrounds” in states around the country, including Wyoming, Washington, and South Carolina. Before long, these so-called “chasing” games will undoubtedly be known as quaint activities from the “unenlightened” past. Only trained professionals at some historic “living” museum like Strawberry Banke or Sturbridge Village will “play” such games.
.
Why is this? With child obesity becoming a more widespread problem, you would think that anything involving physical activity like running would be more encouraged. Hasn’t Gov. Lynch’s wife practically made an entire career of the issue? How can these games be allowed to be taken from the kids? Is it entirely because they’re “exclusionary and dangerous”? Or is it something else? You won’t be surprised, as I wasn’t, when I read the answer in the October 16th article: lawyers.
.
Of course this involves lawyers- or, more specifically, lawsuits. The reasons described are attributed mostly as “reflecting society’s increasingly cautious and litigious nature.” Naturally. “[K]ids would get too rough or run into each other, giving rise to parent complaints and threats of lawsuits.” Once again, the vaunted “threat of lawsuit” stops tradition dead in its tracks.
.
*  *  *
.
While we insulate a whole generation of American children from simple fun games that simultaneously teach important life skills like competition, self-sufficiency and independent thinking, what are our enemies doing? As we admonish our young to quit potentially “dangerous and exclusionary” activities like tag and dodge-ball, what are our adversaries, sworn to kill us all, teaching their children? Do they let them play games involving some sort of “chase?”
.
In the August 23rd 1996 “Declaration of War Against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places,” Osama Bin Laden had much to say about Muslim youth: “I say: Since the sons of the land of the two Holy Places feel and strongly believe that fighting (Jihad) against the Kuffar in every part of the world, is absolutely essential; then they would be even more enthusiastic, more powerful and larger in number upon fighting on their own land… To liberate their sanctities is the greatest of issues concerning all Muslims; It is the duty of every Muslims in this world. I say to you William [Defense Secretary Cohen] that: These youths love death as you loves life. They inherit dignity, pride, courage, generosity, truthfulness and sacrifice from father to father. They are most delivering and steadfast at war. They inherit these values from their ancestors.” Wait a minute- there’s nothing about the dodge-ball being “exclusionary”. What gives?
.

Read more

McCain: When he’s wrong, he’s wrong. When he’s right, he’s right. Today he’s right.

Anybody that knows me knows that I am generally p-o’d at John McCain for whatever cause he happens to be championing. Whether it’s stifling free speech with campaign finance "reform" or seemingly protecting the "rights" of terrorists, I regard him as more harm than good for many of the issues important to me. Many crusades upon which he embarks appear designed for publicity and to distance himself from policies of the Bush administration.
.
That being said, given the poor polling numbers that continue to dog President Bush, there may be- and it’s a big "may"- some "method to his madness." If large numbers of voters continue to allow themselves to be misled by the President’s detractors (main stream media, Democrats, etc.), the only way for any Republican to be successful in ’08 may be by being the "anti-Bush." Do I like this possibilty? No. In a perfect world, more people would wake up, see the soundness of the present administration’s overall strategy, and choose a candidate running a campaign based upon a continuation.
.
The world is not perfect.
.
McCain isn’t always wrong, either. He scored 2 positive points with me this week. First, he guest blogged at Captain’s Quarters (which, now that I think of it, earns him another point) on the North Korea situation. He did this nation a great service by reiterating the folly of the ’94 Clinton administration deal with the communist regime, helping people to recognize that mistake so that we don’t repeat it.
The worst thing we could do is accede to North Korea’s demand for bilateral talks. When has rewarding North Korea’s bad behavior ever gotten us anything more than worse behavior?
.
I would remind Senator Hillary Clinton and other Democrats critical of Bush Administration policies that the framework agreement her husband’s administration negotiated was a failure. The Koreans received millions in energy assistance. They diverted millions in food assistance to their military. And what did they do? They secretly enriched uranium.
.
Prior to the agreement, every single time the Clinton Administration warned the Koreans not to do something — not to kick out the IAEA inspectors, not to remove the fuel rods from their reactor — they did it. And they were rewarded every single time by the Clinton Administration with further talks. We had a carrots and no sticks policy that only encouraged bad behavior. When one carrot didn’t work, we offered another.
.
This isn’t just about North Korea. Iran is watching this test of the Council’s will, and our decisions will surely influence their response to demands that they cease their nuclear program. Now, we must, at long last, stop reinforcing failure with failure.
Amen! This is "straight talk" of the kind that I only wish was more common. What’s not to understand? What is surprising about this from McCain is that he followed it up with another correct statement on an important issue- the Iraqi front in the war. 

Read more

Gaffney on the real “state of denial”

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. is one of my "go-to" people on national security matters and its relation to the new world war. With the mess the media (and the Republicans themselves) have made for the Republicans in the upcoming election thanks to the Foley/ page affair (no pun intended), stirred with the addition of the latest … Read more

The real difference

Here’s a good article.  I just can’t understand why everyone feels the need to kill everyone else in the world, why everyone can’t just live peacefully with other human beings that may be different from them!
 
Remarks of Brigitte Gabriel, delivered at the Duke University Counter Terrorism Speak-Out

I’m proud and honored to stand here today, as a Lebanese speaking for Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East. As someone who was raised in an Arabic country, I want to give you a glimpse into the heart of the Arabic world.

I was raised in Lebanon, where I was taught that the Jews were evil, Israel was the devil, and the

only time we will have peace in the Middle East is when we kill all the Jews and drive them into the sea.

When the Moslems and Palestinians declared Jihad on the Christians in 1975, they started massacring the Christians, city after city. I ended up living in a bomb shelter underground from age 10 to 17, without electricity, eating grass to live, and crawling under sniper bullets to a spring to get water.

It was Israel who came to help the Christians in Lebanon. My mother was wounded by a Moslem’s

shell, and was taken into an Israeli hospital for treatment.When we entered the emergency room, I was shocked at what I saw. There were hundreds of people wounded, Moslems, Palestinians, Christians,Lebanese, and Israeli soldiers lying on the floor. The doctors treated everyone according to their injury. They treated my mother before they treated the Israeli soldier lying next to her. They didn’t see religion, they didn’t see political affiliation, they saw people in need and they helped.

Read more

Bush tells his side. Weekly radio address.

I’m with the president on this…
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Today I want to talk to you about a matter of national security that has been in the news — the National Intelligence Estimate on terrorism. The NIE is a classified document that analyzes the threat we face from terrorists and extremists. Parts of this classified document were recently leaked to the press. That has created a heated debate in our Nation’s capital, and a lot of misimpressions about the document’s conclusions. I believe the American people should read the document themselves and come to their own conclusions, so I declassified its key judgments.
.
The National Intelligence Estimate confirms that we are up against a determined and capable enemy. The NIE lists four underlying factors that are fueling the extremist movement: first, long-standing grievances such as corruption, injustice, and a fear of Western domination; second, the jihad in Iraq; third, the slow pace of reform in Muslim nations; and fourth, pervasive anti-Americanism. It concludes that terrorists are exploiting all these factors to further their movement.
.
Some in Washington have selectively quoted from this document to make the case that by fighting the terrorists in Iraq, we are making our people less secure here at home. This argument buys into the enemy’s propaganda that the terrorists attack us because we are provoking them. Here is what Prime Minister Tony Blair said this week about that argument: "This terrorism isn’t our fault. We didn’t cause it. It’s not the consequence of foreign policy." Prime Minister Blair is right. We do not create terrorism by fighting terrorism. The terrorists are at war against us because they hate everything America stands for, and because they know we stand in the way of their ambitions to take over the Middle East. We are fighting to stop them from taking over Iraq and turning that country into a safe haven that would be even more valuable than the one they lost in Afghanistan.

Read more

From the horse’s mouth… President’s weekly radio address 9/23

As we do every week, GraniteGrok prints the transcript of President Bush’s weekly radio address. This week he discusses moderate reformer leaders from the broader Middle East. I’m not sure I completely agree with his take on Abbas…
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. This week, I traveled to New York City to address the United Nations General Assembly. In my speech to the leaders gathered there, I spoke about a more hopeful world that is within our reach — a world beyond terror, where ordinary men and women are free to determine their own destiny, where the voices of moderation are empowered, and where the extremists are marginalized by the peaceful majority.
.
I said that every nation must make a choice: We can support the moderates and reformers working for change across the broader Middle East, or we can yield the future to the terrorists and extremists. America has made its choice – we’re standing with the moderates and reformers.
.
In New York, I met with two such leaders, President Talabani of Iraq and President Abbas of the Palestinian Authority. In my meeting with President Talabani, I told him that America will continue to support Iraq’s democratic government as it makes the tough decisions necessary to bring security and prosperity to the Iraqi people. I assured President Talabani that America will not abandon the Iraqi people in their struggle to defeat the terrorists and build a free society in the heart of the Middle East.
.
In my meeting with President Abbas, I told him that America remains committed to the vision of two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, living side-by-side in peace and security. President Abbas shares this goal. He’s working hard to oppose violent extremists and build a society in which the Palestinian people can raise their children in peace and hope.
By supporting moderate leaders such as President Abbas, the United States can help Israelis and Palestinians build a more hopeful future and achieve the peace we all want in the Holy Land.

Read more

Who is Sununu protecting?

Last week, I wondered who exactly MY U.S. Senator John E. Sununu actually represents in Washington, DC. because of what he said in a September 12th speech given at a luncheon hosted by the American Arab Institute. In that speech, he discussed how his Lebanese ancestry allowed him to bring a "personal perspective" to debates involving Arab-related issues in … Read more

Kissinger: “War of Civilizations”

Henry Kissinger- people either like him, or hate him. My Dad can’t stand him and has long blamed the oil mess we’ve been in since 1973 on "that rat Kissinger." I’m not sure whether I agree with Dad on that one, but I guess I must say I’ve long wondered about the enigmatic Henry Kissinger. … Read more

Axis of Evil Summit in Cuba. Deja-Vue Again.

The Washington Times reports on what I call the "Axis of Evil Summit" wrap-up in Havana, Cuba with the requisite America-bashing we have come to expect from this bunch. Additionally,  the attendees backed Iran’s "peaceful" nuclear program. No real surprise there, either.
Developing countries yesterday wrapped up a multinational summit with North Korea charging that U.S. threats drove it to acquire deterrent atomic weapons and Iran winning solid support for its nuclear ambitions. Iran, Venezuela and Cuba joined North Korea in leading efforts to forge an anti-U.S. alliance. Summit leaders, in a statement on Iran, "reaffirmed the basic and inalienable right of all states to develop research, production and use of atomic energy for peaceful purposes."
Of course, it’s all OUR fault that these countries seek the weapons of mass destruction. Seeing the writing on the wall regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions, given President Bush’s resolve in his pledge to prevent that country’s development of atomic weapons, the collected rogue regime leaders
warned that any attack or threat against any nuclear facility used for peaceful purposes was a violation of international law.
Since when does Iran, Cuba, and North Korea care about "international law?" Only when pointing fingers at the US, naturally.
.
As I noted in past postings, the sides are being drawn in the new world war, and enemy players include countries right in our own hemisphere.

Read more

From the horse’s mouth… President’s Weekly Radio Address

Every week, President Bush delivers a radio address, a-la- the famous "Fireside Chats" by FDR. Because of the vast differences in our daily lives since the Roosevelt administartion, most people no longer gather ’round the radio for news and entertainment, especially on the weekends- which means you, like most Americans, didn’t hear what the President had to say. GraniteGrok feels it’s important for well-informed people to give the President a listen, whether you agree with him or not.
.
This week he discusses the need for two pieces of legislation he feels is needed to properly interrogate and prosecute terrorists. This is the same legislation you have been hearing about this week in the media involving "renegade" Republicans (including, naturally, John McCain) trying to derail the president’s proposals:
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. On Monday, I visited New York, Pennsylvania, and the Pentagon to attend memorials marking the fifth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. It was an emotional day for me and for our country. On that day, we remembered those who lost their lives, and we paid tribute to those who gave their lives so that others might live. We rededicated ourselves to protecting the American people from another attack.
.
Next week, I will return to New York, where I will address the United Nations General Assembly. I look forward to talking to the world leaders gathered there about our obligation to defend civilization, and how we must work together to support the forces of freedom and moderation throughout the Middle East.
.
As we work with the international community to defeat the terrorists and extremists, we must also provide our military and intelligence professionals the tools they need to keep our country safe. Congress is considering two vital pieces of legislation to help us do just that. My Administration is working closely with members of both parties to pass these bills.

Read more

“Islamists Riot in Rage at ( fill in blank )”

Another day. Another "outrage." The never-ending indignation of the always "insulted" Muslim street continues apace. Day after day come the headlines and scrolling kyrons at the bottom of the news TV screens. By now, they are completely ubiquitous and part of the "background" like so much white noise. You’ve all seen them:
"Islamists riot in rage at the Muhammed Cartoons"
"Islamists riot in rage at the Israeli incursion"
"Islamists riot in rage at the toilet flushing of Koran"
"Islamists riot in rage at Abu Graib prisoner abuse"
"Islamists riot in rage at (_enter grievance dujour here__)."
.
Of course, today’s grievance entry is Pope Benedict XVI. You know the story: Pope gives speech-Mentions Islam in an historical context, and denounces violence. The "offended" party reacts with violent outrage at the insinuation they are violent… From the BBC, here are some reactions from Muslim leaders to the Pope’s words:

Read more

Explaining the war. September 11th, 5 years later.

Today is the fifth anniversary of the most devastating attack on our homeland since December 7th, 1941. The events of both days demonstrate again history’s ability to repeat itself.
.
Following the Pearl Harbor attack, in his December 9th radio address to the nation, President Roosevelt explained the state of war thrust upon the country:
“The sudden criminal attacks perpetrated by the Japanese in the Pacific provide the climax of a decade of international immorality. Powerful and resourceful gangsters have banded together to make war upon the whole human race…Together with other free peoples, we are fighting to maintain our right to live among our world neighbors in freedom and in common decency without fear of assault… We are now in this war. We are all in it- all the way. Every single man, woman, and child is a partner in the most tremendous undertaking of our American history. We must share together the bad news and the good news, the defeats and the victories- the changing fortunes of war.”
.
As we know, that war was enormous in its scope and ferocity. At times, things looked pretty bleak for our side.
.
On September 20th, 2001, President Bush addressed a joint session of Congress and the American people, describing for the nation the sudden state of a new war:
“On September the 11th, enemies of freedom committed an act of war against our country.  Americans have known wars — but for the past 136 years, they have been wars on foreign soil, except for one Sunday in 1941.  Americans have known the casualties of war — but not at the center of a great city on a peaceful morning.  Americans have known surprise attacks — but never before on thousands of civilians.  All of this was brought upon us in a single day — and night fell on a different world, a world where freedom itself is under attack.”
The President identified the enemy:
“Our enemy is a radical network of terrorists, and every government that supports them.”
He then declared war:
 “Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there.  It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated.”

Read more

Guess who’s coming to dinner? Who invited him?

In this previous posting, I applauded  Mitt Romney’s stance regarding Sunday’s lecture in Massachusetts at Harvard’s Institute of politics. Today’s Boston Herald published a letter from Daniel Wolfson of Brookline, MA expressing a similar sentiment to mine on the upcoming visit of the former Iranian leader and Gov. Mitt Romney’s refusal of the use of … Read more

Mitt: Thumbs up. US State Dept.: Thumbs down.

Here at GraniteGrok, we spank ’em when they’re wrong… and thank ’em when they’re right- . While we have been somewhat tough on possible presidential wannabee Mitt Romney (here and here), today we congratulate him for his stance on a visiting terror state leader. Today’s (Sept. 6) Boston Herald reports: Gov. Mitt Romney is refusing to … Read more

President Bush speaks. Often, actually.

We repeatedly hear people say that the President hasn’t spent enough time "selling" the war. I have said it fairly often myself. I had the opportunity to speak with a high level administration official recently and mentioned precisely that point. "Why doesn’t the President speak to the people? You know, explain the situation so that they’ll understand it." I said. His answer reminded me that the President, in fact, does- every week in his "Weekly Radio Address". Like Roosevelt’s famous "Fireside Chats", President Bush has taken time every Saturday to speak to the nation. You probably missed them because other than the occasional mention as part of some news blurb, the MSM virtually ignores them. He suggested I make it a point to either listen to it or read it every week.
.
This is what the President said this past Saturday, September 2nd:
Good morning. This week, I spoke to the American Legion in Salt Lake City. I thanked the military veterans for their lifetime of service to our country. And I gave them an update on the war that America is now fighting in defense of freedom in our time.
.
We’re approaching the fifth anniversary of the September the 11th attacks — and since that day, we have taken the fight to the enemy. Yet this war is more than a military conflict; it is the decisive ideological struggle of the 21st century. On one side are those who believe in freedom and moderation — the right of all people to speak, worship, and live in liberty. On the other side are those driven by tyranny and extremism — the right of a self-appointed few to impose their fanatical views on all the rest. We did not ask for this war, but we’re answering history’s call with confidence — and we will prevail.
.
We are using every element of national power to defeat the terrorists. First, we’re staying on the offense against the terrorists, fighting them overseas so we do not have to face them here at home. Second, we made it clear to all nations, if you harbor terrorists, you’re as guilty as the terrorists, you’re an enemy of the United States, and you will be held to account. And third, we have launched a bold new agenda to defeat the ideology of the enemy by supporting the forces of freedom and moderation in the Middle East and beyond.

Read more

Notable Quotes: George P. Shultz on preemptive action

Former Secretary of State George P. Shultz wrote the following back in 1986 in an essay included in the book, Terrorism- How the West Can Win. Twenty years ago… Can we as a country, can the community of free nations, stand in a purely defensive posture and absorb the blows dealt by terrorists? . I … Read more

Share to...