President’s Radio Address: Israel and Palestine– living side by side in peace and security.

palestinian baby
.
Here is this week’s radio address from President Bush, discussing his current trip to the Middle East. I just don’t think the Palestians are capable of what Bush asks. Until they do nothing less than recognize Israel as a state, it won’t work. But, maybe Bush can succeed where others have failed. If he can get the other countries to join in preventing Iran and al Qaida from pouring monies and extremism into the area, maybe it could work…
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. I’m speaking to you from the Middle East, where I have been meeting with friends and allies. We’re discussing how we can work together to confront the extremists who threaten our future. And I have encouraged them to take advantage of the historic opportunity we have before us to advance peace, freedom, and security in this vital part of the world.
.
My first stop was Israel and the Palestinian Territories. I had good meetings with Israeli Prime Minister Olmert and Palestinian President Abbas. Both these men are committed to peace in the Holy Land. Both these men have been elected by their people. And both share a vision of two democratic states — Israel and Palestine — living side by side in peace and security. 

Read more

Days of Infamy. What a difference sixty six years makes…

Carrier Shokaku
Planes of second wave ready for takeoff on carrier Shokaku
.
“On the morning of December 7, 1941, that Fleet’s planes bombed all the US military air bases on the island (the biggest was the US Army air base at Hickam Field), and the ships anchored at Pearl, including ‘Battleship Row’. Nearly every plane on the ground was destroyed; only a few fighters got airborne and opposed the attacking planes. Twelve battleships and other ships either were sunk or damaged, 188 aircraft were destroyed, and 2,403 Americans lost their lives. The battleship USS Arizona exploded and sank with a loss of over 1,100 men, nearly half of the American dead.”
The next day, President Roosevelt addressed Congress. [These quotes come directly from the noted speeches as found in Volume Two of the series "This is America My Country", 1952.]
“Yesterday, December 7, 1941- a date which will live in infamy- the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan.”
He went on to describe the job at hand:
“As Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy I have directed that all measures be taken for our defense.”
Roosevelt then rightly predicted,
“Always will our whole nation remember the character of the onslaught against us. No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people in their righteous might will win through to absolute victory.”
In his December 9th radio address to the Nation President Roosevelt said,
.

Read more

Thank God for the Bomb (Allah willing…). Should we attack Iran?

. We all hear talk about a need to do something about Iran. Many people, myself included, believe we’ve been at war with them since 1979, only our side doesn’t fight. Presently, the discussion of dealing with Iran and its threats and nuclear ambitions is something that is getting a fair amount of play in the … Read more

History recommends “prudent rulers” and “pre-emptive” war. Or else…

machiavelliIran hostages
.
Bush the conqueror
.
MaldivesCulture writes in this post from 2003
Niccolo Machiavelli was an Italian who died 1527 at the age of 58. He was a famous political theorist who advocated the principle of realpolitic – politics in its real sense, and how a ruler should rule a country.
.
Realpolitic might be described as the dirty side of politics. Machiavelli believed that human beings are by nature more likely to do evil things than good. Human beings are ungrateful, selfish, violent, and anti-social and have an instinct of wickedness that is always dominant in their behaviour.
I was re-reading some portions of The Prince by Machiavelli, which I like to do from time to time, and came across this passage that really sums up our present situation. By not taking care of the Islamic problem when it manifested itself in the 1979 hostage crisis, we instead find ourselves in a much worse situation today, with Iran on the verge of obtaining nuclear weapons. Discussing the relationship between Rome, Greece, and the surrounding territories, Machiavelli writes:
[T]he Romans did what all wise rulers must: cope not only with present troubles but also with ones likely to rise in future, and assiduously forestall them. When trouble is sensed well in advance it can easily be remedied; if you wait for it to show itself any medicine will be too late because the disease will have become incurable.
Keep in mind that at the time, Rome was the dominating power throughout the civilized world, much as, whether we want to admit it or not, America is today. If you believe that this is OK because ours is the best civilization, as I do, then you know that the same maxims of self defense apply to us as they did to the Romans and should be employed. In a world of would-be destroyers, sometimes action is necessary. Machiavelli continues:
As the doctors say of a wasting disease, to start with it is easy to cure but difficult to diagnose; after a time, unless it has been diagnosed and treated at the outset, it becomes easy to diagnose but difficult to cure. So it is in politics. Political disorders can be quickly healed if they are seen well in advance (and only a prudent ruler has such foresight); when, for lack of a diagnosis, they are allowed to grow in such a way that everyone can recognize them, remedies are too late.
The question we face is whether at present, we are treating the "disease" that is Islamicism at the outset, or near the end. Should we have stamped out the problem in 1979? With over a billion Muslims and growing, all susceptible to the radicalized strain of the Islamo-fascists, are we too late? Maybe not. Again, from The Prince:

Read more

The New World War. Understanding it, and recognizing its heroes…

US soldiers on patrol in Philippines . Col. Oliver North writes an instructive essay describing one of the lesser-known fronts in what I call the ‘new world war’: the Phillipines. In a piece entitled The Future of the ‘War on Terror’ he writes about one of our many outstanding soldiers selflessly defending us in that battle zone.  You won’t hear this in … Read more

Depends on the meaning of “torture”

BDP, writing at AnkleBitingPundits, defends the right for the US to continue using techniques such as "waterboarding" when interrogating terrorists for information. The subject has once again been raised, this time during the Attorney General confirmation hearings of Edward Mukasey. BDP boils away the politics and sets the real facts of the matter: Congress had … Read more

The smartest man in America?

Former Ambassador Bolton . Back in January, I noted Of all the casualties of the past election, the loss of John Bolton as our UN ambassador is the one that I regret the most. To have had a plain spoken person advocating first for what’s best FOR AMERICA on the world stage during the last … Read more

War against “radical extremism”? Huh?

Mark Steyn, hands down my favorite writer, laments the fact that we fail to recognize the role that ideology plays in what I like to call "the new world war." A failure to actually name the enemy, coupled with a lack of a clearly defined course on how to sustain the war and ultimately defeat our … Read more

From the “You’re kidding, right?” department comes this gem…

. . Yahoo News is reporting via AFP that New York’s iconic Empire State Building is to be lit up green from Friday in honor of the Muslim holiday of Eid, the biggest festival in the Muslim calendar marking the end of Ramadan, officials said. . "This is the first time that the Empire State … Read more

Rep. King is right.

Regarding the story coming from the Politico about Republican NY Rep. Peter King, I’m glad to hear from somebody with a bully pulpit that truly gets it when it comes to the new world war in which we find ourselves enmeshed.  It might not be pretty. In fact, what he espouses sounds harsh at the first hearing, … Read more

What? We are Fighting an International Mafia?

On September 12, Phillip Walker published this piece in the Concord Monitor. Well, you know me, I had to write in and respond with this. Here’s another letter to the editor responding to Mr. Walker’s editorial. I think Mr. Walker needs to stick to training staff of the Afghan Foreign Ministry in international legal practice … Read more

What about Iran?

Yesterday Skip and I had the opportunity to attend a "No Surrender" rally with John McCain at the Franklin home of the Grimm family. Following that, we rode on the his campaign bus where we chatted some detailed points about Iraq, listened in as he did the Jon Stewart show via cellphone, and ate some chicken wings … Read more

An important week, Part II– “I urge the Members of Congress to listen to these two well-respected professionals — before jumping to any conclusions.”

Bush in Iraq
This is REAL diplomacy…
.
Following up on my prior post about the importance of this upcoming week in which I lamented Bush’s lack of perceived wartime leadership, I thought it would be worthwhile to help disseminate what he is, in fact saying. As I said, I don’t fault WHAT he’s doing as Commander-In-Chief, but more that, for whatever reason, he’s been unable to make his case to the American people. I believe that, properly infomed, the average citizen of this great country will, in fact, come to the right conclusions about the important matters of our times.
.
It’s not that Bush isn’t making the attempt, it’s just that he’s not very good at working the media to get his message out. Why? Who knows. For all the supposed prowess of political advisor Karl Rove, this is an area the Bush Administration is sorely left wanting. In an effort to help our president so that we can win this thing, once again, we publish his weekly radio address here on the ‘Grok for our readers to review. Lord knows the MSM will only put forth snippets and chunks of the whole thing, designed, naturally, to show President Bush and his policies in the worst possible light. Don’t accept that. Read all of his words in context, and think for yourself.
.
In his speech, he discusses the real progress being made in Iraq as a result of our new strategy, talks about the REAL diplomacy being engaged, and begs Congress to actually listen to what they’re being told before jumping to their expected conclusions. Just because some Democrat "leaders" in Washington refuse to hear, it doesn’t mean the rest of us can’t…
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Earlier this week, I traveled to Iraq’s Anbar Province to visit our troops and see with my own eyes the remarkable changes they are making possible. If you want to see some photos from this trip, go to whitehouse.gov where you can view a slideshow of my visit.
.
Success in Anbar is critical to the democratic future of Iraq and to the war on terror. This largely Sunni province covers nearly a third of Iraq. It stretches from the outskirts of Baghdad to Iraq’s borders with Jordan, and Syria, and Saudi Arabia. And until recently, Anbar was al Qaeda’s chief base of operations in Iraq.
.
Last year at this time, Anbar was all over the news. Newspapers at the time cited a leaked intelligence report that was pessimistic about our prospects there. One columnist summed it up this way: "The war is over in Anbar province, and the United States lost." But local citizens soon saw what life under al Qaeda meant for them. The terrorists brutalized the people of Anbar and killed those who opposed their dark ideology. So the tribal sheiks of Anbar came together to fight al Qaeda. They asked for support from the Coalition and the Iraqi government, and we responded.
.
Together we have driven al Qaeda out of strongholds in Anbar. The level of violence is down. Local governments are meeting again. Young Sunnis are joining the police and army. And normal life is returning. The people of Anbar have seen that standing up to the terrorists and extremists leads to a better life. And Anbar has shown that improving security is the first step toward achieving economic progress and political reconciliation.

Read more

VLog: Rudy on the war (not just the Iraqi front)

At a town hall meeting in Concord NH on 7/10/07, Rudy Giuliani discussed the war from a broad view. He emphasised that the war with Islamic terrorists goes far beyond Iraq. He also counsels we wait for the September reports from the military leaders in Iraq before making any conclusions about defeat. I agree. He discusses … Read more

Notable Quotes: Ronald Reagan describes today’s enemy.

As I noted in this other posting, today is the twentieth anniversary of Reagan’s famous speech calling on Gorbachev to "tear down this wall." Within it, one finds these words. Less famous perhaps, but they have a renewed relevance to us today, as we find ourselves in a new world war with Islamofascism, the latest incarnation … Read more

A possible future?

    . Our friend and fellow Gilford, NH blogger (and fill-in MTNP radio host), DCE at the WeekendPundit writes a thought-provoking future history essay. A possible future newscast: “It’s July 4th, 2036, a day of celebration and remembrance. We celebrate the 260th anniversary of the founding of the Republic. We also remember the 20th anniversary … Read more

Did you hear the good news from Iraq? I didn’t think so.

Whether a McCain supporter or not, one has to admit the guy is doing yeoman’s work in his support of the notion of achieving success in the Iraqi front of the war. As I noted in this prior post about McCain and others being heckled by a CNN "reporter," he is in Iraq for a first … Read more

The World Needs Great Men Like Dick Cheney

 
One of my favorite moments in politics from recent times was when Vice President Dick Cheney dropped the "f-bomb" on Sen. Pat Leahey (D-VT) after the Senator slammed him with the "Halliburton as beneficiary of government" meme for the umpteenth time. CNN.com reported on the aftermath, following Cheney’s appearance on Neal Cavuto’s Fox News Channel program after the incident:
When asked if he had cursed at Leahy, Cheney answered, "Probably." "Do you have any regrets?," Neil Cavuto asked. "No. I said it," the vice president responded.
He further remarked, that, of those Senators who heard the exchange, some
"felt that what I’d said badly needed to be said, that it was long overdue."
He explained it this way:
"Part of the problem here is that instead of having a substantive debate over important substantive policy issues, he had challenged my integrity, and I didn’t like that. But most of all I didn’t like the fact that after he’d done so, then he wanted to act like everything was peaches and cream."
There you go. Like him or not, Dick Cheney calls ’em as he sees ’em. That was back in June of 2004. It’s now 2007, and Dick Cheney is still Dick Cheney. I, for one, am glad of that. This week has been a busy one for the Vice President, who demonstrated again why he continues to earn my respect and enthusiastic support…
.

Read more

This guy “gets it”

My new hero is Australian Prime Minister John Howard who, according to a Fox News report, had this to say about Democratic presidential wannabee Barack Obama’s "plan" for complete withdrawal from Iraq by March 31st, ’08: Australian Prime Minister John Howard, a staunch Bush ally who has sent troops to Iraq and faces his own re-election bid … Read more

Share to...