Writ of Mandamus

The Speaker of the NH House and President of the NH Senate Willfully Ignored the Law – An Update

The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Stephan Shurtleff, and Senate President Donna Soucy have refused to perform their Constitutional duties to provide me with Due Process of Law, and my Right of Redress of Grievance as protected by the New Hampshire Constitution. ICYMI:   Biden Says he Supports Defunding the Police – Media Tries to … Read more

NH Dems Diversity Olympics

The New Hampshire Democrats submitted their plan for delegate selection to the National Democrat Party, and it was accepted.  The 76-page document (76 pages?) can be read here. Luckily they included comments at the end on the overall delegate selection rules put forth by the DNC. Some, including Senate President Donna Soucy (D- Manchester) are … Read more

NH Stuck on Pot?

New Hampshire is behind all of our neighbors when it comes to marijuana and cannabis laws, that’s for sure. Some say that’s for the good, some disagree. So what is holding New Hampshire back on marijuana, even for medical use? There were three bills related to cannabis that the Governor vetoed this year: SB88, SB145, … Read more

New Hampshire Democrats and Antisemitism

Tomorrow a Women’s March is taking place in Concord: There is also a Women’s March taking place in DC and other cities tomorrow. These marches have been associated with antisemitism and the DNC and multiple prominent progressive groups have pulled their support: The Democratic National Committee (DNC) has joined a number of prominent progressive advocacy … Read more

This is Democrat Donna Soucy’s version of “Diversity”?

Or as one wag put it “How’d that white guy sneak in?”.  These kinds of photographs are staged – it is part of the “inside-baseball”, “behind the curtains” kinds of political stagecraft that a campaign does all the time.  You think that all those people in the stands at a rally are chosen at random?  … Read more

Some Thoughts on the House Bill 1264 Memoranda Filed With the Supreme Court — Part III

clean-electionsDEMOCRAT STATE SENATORS WOODBURN, SOUCY, AND FELTES 

As I discussed in Part I, the primary argument of these Democrat State Senators —like the ACLU and like the Democrat Executive Councilors— is that the Court should not return answers to the questions.  Because I already addressed this argument in my discussion of the Attorney General’s memorandum in Part I, I will not repeat it here.

The Democrat State Senators argue that House Bill 1264 violates Part I, Article 11 because Part I, Article 11 requires the State to maintain two class of domiciliary: resident and nonresident.  This argument is the same argument advanced by the ACLU and so can be answered in the same manner.

Read more

Share to...