Last nite’s SOTU speech – couple of observations

Well, I’m not all that surprised at the reactions – if you are on the Left, this was (at least, spoken out loud) equal to sliced bread.  On the Right, not so much.  I took it to be rather long, disjointed, and at the end, wondering about his speech writers.  Of course, TOTUS is starting to become a bore and given the ubiquity of it everywhere, I think most have come to the conclusion that he can’t give a cogent speech without it.  I guess we can just think of it as the equivalent of his binky, blanket, or Amex card – for all ages (as we found out with our kids), one should never leave home without them.

All that said, what it really comes down to is how did the operator / Talent / President do?  During the campaign, he always seemed to keep his cool. Last night, though, he had another "face" – one that was more biting, more angry; like a father dressing down recalcitrant kids, or a teacher trying to maintain control over a classroom full of class clowns.  In other words, someone trying to fight to maintain (or regain) control of the situation.  

Much of it was standard fare, but on more occasions than necessary, rather than sounding and being Presidential, he came off as being simply petty.  Or what he really is: a Community Organizer – which really showed last night.  A C.O. needs an enemy to focus on, to ridicule, to make hay against, and thus, have a target to rally his troops to attack.

Problem is, he’s trying to pit Congress and Senate and the Supreme Court all against each other while still doing what a C.O. does which is remain in the background and keep his troops in front of him.

Problem is, it is hard to be in that background when you are the President at the State of the Union address.  And that presented the problem to Obama, as he can be a campaigner, he can be a C.O., but seemingly is having more and more problems in being successful at what he is being paid to do: be President.  And last night, it showed.  And I’m not the only one:

Jules Crittenden: “But seriously, we have just witnessed an extraordinary exercise in presidential oratorical animation that may be without peer or precedent. Can it be said that any American president has ever tried to blame so much on other people, or has been willing to so rapidly abandon his own principles for the betterment of his standing with the people, to seize up the banner against himself in our nation’s time of need, that this nation should not stand against him? For this, the president deserves our unabashed, gaga-eyed astonishment.”

John Podhoretz: “One liberal trope after the speech, voiced by Chrystia Freedland of the Financial Times on Charlie Rose, is that Obama is putting Republican politicians on notice he will go after them as the do-nothing impeders of progress. Republicans should pray this is the case, and it may be the case.” In New Jersey, Virginia, and Massachusetts he’s proven impotent. Why should people fear him more now, when he’s weaker?

Prof. Randy Barnett: In the history of the State of the Union has any President ever called out the Supreme Court by name, and egged on the Congress to jeer a Supreme Court decision, while the Justices were seated politely before him surrounded by hundreds [of] Congressmen? To call upon the Congress to countermand (somehow) by statute a constitutional decision, indeed a decision applying the First Amendment? What can this possibly accomplish besides alienating Justice Kennedy who wrote the opinion being attacked. Contrary to what we heard during the last administration, the Court may certainly be the object of presidential criticism without posing any threat to its independence. But this was a truly shocking lack of decorum and disrespect towards the Supreme Court for which an apology is in order. A new tone indeed.

and the most devastating: Meryl Yourish

Tonight, he addressed the American people, and he addressed Congress. Go back and look at the speech. He was earnest, and his chin was down, his head relatively level, when speaking to Congress. When he spoke to us, his chin rose, and he talked down to us—literally.

Go ahead. Take a look. Note his posture. You’ll see it, too. You and I, we are not his equals. He is above us.
That’s what sets my teeth on edge every time I listen to him.

(H/T: Instapundit)

Problem is

Read more

Why do we need unions in Goverment?

Government employee unionization should be outlawed. Unlike all other employers, government at every level is a monopoly. Accordingly, people have no choice on whether to patronize the "business" of local, state, or federal government. There is no competition. Government employee unions can thus directly attack the public interest with impunity: Their employer cannot go out … Read more

Thoughts on the US Supreme Court decision on Citizens United

It is not clear to me that most people understand just what a game-changer the Supreme Court’s just-issued opinion in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission really is. It upholds the Constitution and eviscerates the unconstitutional McCain-Feingold law that was proposed and pushed by the most recent Republican Presidential candidate, John McCain, and signed by … Read more

It doesn’t take a weatherman….

Several libertarian-types I know have unhappily pointed out that Scott Brown in Massachusetts supported then-Gov. Mitt Romney’s state-level socialized medicine scheme when it was passed. “What’s the point?” they say. If Brown supported socialized medicine in Massachusetts, he may well support some type of socialized medicine in the U.S. Senate. Happily, I have the solution … Read more

Pendulum is swinging – Results of Tuesday’s NH Special Elections

Take a look at the numbers, everyone. They are very good news for conservative Republicans, and for the state of New Hampshire. However, there is meaning beyond the simple winning of the indicated special elections. Like the governorships of Virginia and New Jersey, which recently switched to elected Republicans (New Jersey!), and like the now-tied … Read more

Hypocrites!

I was brought up in 1950’s America. My mom stayed home to raise my sister and I. My dad went to work at two jobs to make ends meet. One of the many principles that my parents taught me was the principle of personal integrity. This principle dictates that your own personal conduct must always … Read more

A New Year Dawns

A new year is already upon us. Now is a good time for thoughtful reflection and consideration. There is no need for me to recap all the bad things that have transpired over the last year. There has been enough press and reports to keep us fully informed, if we wanted to be. Suffice it … Read more

Is Regime Change Coming to Iran? – an interview with Amil Imani

 

Iranians in revolt

Introduction: Since the fraudulent June 12th Presidential elections in the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI), an increasingly emboldened opposition, the green movement, has arisen to demand the overthrow of the IRI. The green movement refuses to desist from launching massive street protests in Tehran, Qum, Isfahan and other major Iranian cities. All this is occurring despite violence wreaked upon thousands of valiant regime opponents by the ruling Mullahs and President Ahmadinejad. As of this writing more than 15 have been killed in clashes with Iranian security services including the nephew of reformist Presidential candidate Mir Mouhammed Mousavi, former IRI Prime Minister. Moreover several dissident leaders have been jailed. Something major is brewing in Iran – possibly revolution.
 
As the year was closing, first a crescendo of massive protests occurred at Students Day events. Then tens of thousands used the occasion of the funeral of Grand Ayatollah Montazeri to demonstrate their determination to end the rule of the Supreme Ruling Council head, Ayatollah Khamanei, and his puppet President Ahmadinejad. The final bloody weekend of 2009 witnessed the faltering IRI regime undertaking unprecedented security measures to pre-empt public mourning and observances of the Shia Ashura holy day. Police, revolutionary guard and the Basiji para-military forces blanketed Tehran in a vain attempt to stifle public gatherings. They failed. Massive throngs of people from all classes in Tehran and other major cities defied bans in spite of warnings that violators would be dealt with mercilessly.  As a Der Spiegel article reported these protesters were shouting: "We will fight, we will die, we will reconquer our country." There were graphic video images sent via the internet of protesters engaged in street battles with Basiji forces. 
 
Now there are reports that elements of the Iranian Military may have sided with the opposition in support of a secular republic. Jane Jamison in the American Thinker noted in a report, “Iranian Military moves in support the people’s revolution”:

It is difficult to verify, but factions in the Iranian military may be breaking rank to join the people’s cause. A group calling itself the National Iranian Armed Resistance Forces (NIRU) posted a news release on an Iranian protest website at the end of the day’s violence.
 
We, a number of Officers, Soldiers and personnel of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, hereby declare our readiness for rise to the armed defense of our nation against the forces of the criminal, illegitimate transgressing and occupying current Government of Iran, and hereby inform our brothers and sisters serving with the armed security forces of Iran, invite them to join us, request their support and ask them to provide cover for us in this moral & national act. A special request for support & cooperation goes to our brothers of the Military Police.

The NIRU says it intends to secure Iranian radio and television stations, the Parliament, and the courts, will hold local elections and referendums within 3 months and new presidential elections within 9 months and will dissolve the murderous “Basij” plainclothes police and establish a new national police force.

Protection and firepower from even a few factions of the military could signal a critical momentum change for the Iranian people, who by law cannot own weapons.

All this occurred despite the visible tyranny imposed by Basij para-military, Revolutionary Guards, and regime secret police arresting, beating and torturing opposition student and opposition political leaders. All this amidst vain attempts to prevent the news of this emerging Iranian revolution reaching the world by cell phone and the internet.
 
Some observers have even suggested that the apocalyptic version of Shia Islam espoused by the ruling Mullahs, might ultimately be consigned to the dustbin of history if such a revolution occurred.

Amir Taheri, expatriate Iranian journalist, in a Wall Street Journal column, …

Read more

An Open Letter to the Republican Party

It seems that the Republican Party,  both nationally and locally, have a particular mindset towards the Tea Parties and their supporters. You think that you are the inheritors of their support. With respect, may I disabuse you of that false notion. Throughout the coarse of the last administration, conservatives were routinely thrown under the bus. … Read more

Free speech – Fine for me but not for thee?

One of the questions that inevitably occurs to any politically aware defender of liberty is this: Will the time ever arrive when active resistance is required? Will the political class eventually gain enough control over government that it will step over that invisible line for millions of Americans? It is a thought that comes in … Read more

It’s the SPENDING, stupid!

I received this email from a Left leaning person (supposedly a NH resident but I’m not totally sure; any NH person with any worth wouldn’t take such a position!) complaining that because we do not have an income tax here in NH, people are SUFFERING!  Because the State refuses to tax people more, problems will … Read more

Share to...