Newborn-Killing Dems Pivot on “Women’s Health Care” and End Up Under a Different Narrative Bus

by
Steve MacDonald

The Left’s all-in abortion argument is about killing newborns. That’s what they are running on (at least, here, in New Hampshire). The right to kill a baby at birth. But almost no one but the far Left thinks abortion should be permitted in the third trimester and certainly not during birth. So, the Dems are pivoting…into a hole.

Related: NH Democrats Confirm Support for “Post-Birth Abortion”

To Democrats, women’s health is about conception to live birth abortion. Anything less is you or the government getting between women and their doctors. But you don’t need a doctor in New Hampshire to perform an abortion. Hairdressers are more highly regulated. Almost anyone can do it, and there are no reporting requirements to document who did what to whom. Oh, and you should pay for them!

We could easily say that Democrats don’t want the government to come between you and your landscaper, plumber, accountant, hygenist, nurse practitioner, or anyone, and health care. But that’s another lie. They want the government to come between you and everything except (they say) women’s health care (also a lie)

But here we are (in NH) with a reasonable 24-week drop-dead date for abortions that most of the world embraces, if not sooner, and the Dems are ranting about how extreme that is. They won’t stand for anything less than abortion up to birth, but no one agrees with that, so they must couch the details in a lie.

Hello COVID!

Yes, we’ve traveled this well-worn road before, but this is essential stuff. When Ann Kuster, Maggie Hassan, or Chris “Norovirus” Pappas flap their yap about extremism and health, it is immediately negated by their behavior during the so-called pandemic. And it is up to us (yes, you) to push back.

When they say Republicans are extreme on abortion, ask them, so as a supporter, how do you think live birth abortions should be performed? Hey, if you’re good with this, what’s the most humane way to end it? Chemical execution like they do with condemned criminals or pull a Kermit Gosnell and cut their spinal cord at the neck?

What are your thoughts, Mr. Ms. Ze or whatever Democrat Abortion supporter?

I’m expected to explain my support for capital punishment. How is this any different, except for the lack of evidence, criminal charges, a trial, and a verdict of one’s peers?

What if they were born that way, but you sanctioned their execution ala abortion? Does that qualify as anti-gay bigotry? Are you guilty of a hate crime? Is the mother eligible for reparations? Are you going to make me pay them?

When the coming between doctor and patient rears its two-faced head, ask why that doesn’t apply to doctors who think FDA-approved drugs are best for their patients with COVID. How come the government can get between women and their doctors then? Why isn’t that hypocritical or contradictory, and now more than ever, after two years of human test trials on hundreds of millions of recipients?

There are better ways to protect and treat people, but the government keeps getting in the way.

They might swear and call you names or change the subject, but you keep them on point. And make sure, especially if this is on social media, to screengrab things regularly as they are likely to disappear or you are likely to get banned or blocked.

Nothing says tolerance like a Lefty bailing on an argument they can’t win, especially regarding women’s health care and abortion.

 

 

Author

  • Steve MacDonald

    Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, blogger, and a member of the Board of directors of The 603 Alliance. He is the owner of Grok Media LLC and the Managing Editor of GraniteGrok.com, a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, and a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

Share to...