MicroGroks
If balanced “reporting” were an objective goal, the New Hampshire media would share more of the same stories we publish on our pages. Doctors, epidemiologists, and medical professionals are concerned about the approved narratives and treatments and the absence of viable alternatives.
“Those new machines are known as the “ImageCast Precinct” optical scan tabulators. They are manufactured by Dominion Voting Systems.” Two of the largest news media outlets in New Hampshire could only manage shoddy, half-baked, propaganda-style reporting of the Windham Board of Selectmen meeting held on March 1st to quell the concerns of Windham voters following …
Back on Jan 3 (it seems SO long ago!), the Union Leader has an editorial titled “Wrong place to protest: Sununu’s home should be off-base.” They were kvetching that ordinary citizens shouldn’t be protesting NH Gov Chris Sununu’s Emergency Orders at his home.
And after two condescending (and rather snotty) emails (here and here) DEMANDING comments from legislators who went “naked faced” during outdoor Legislative meetings, Mark Hayward has published his rant.
Unbelievable. I would be telling Mark Hayward from the Union Leader to go stuff himself. I might even start using foul language (which those that know me well, know I don’t).
I know some sensitive readers will say it is wrong to celebrate people losing their livelihoods, but I think, like a restaurant that makes its customers sick with bad food, the media deserves this.
As usual, the Union Leader only gave one side of the story to the Nashua taxpayers on the purchase of the new school.
Reporting yesterday’s rally and march, the Epoch Times leads with “Hundreds of thousands of people from all over the country joined a peaceful rally on Nov. 14 in the nation’s capital.” The Local paper, the Union Leader, has the Reuters story that leads with “Thousands.”
Two and a half years ago, I realized something. GraniteGrok.com more or less owned the internet space on the right in New Hampshire, or should. With a bit of effort and some donations from readers to retool the footprint, we did that. We claimed the space as ours.
I guess the UL now believes that “Live Free or Die” isn’t a two-way street. Once again, I ask – is it really still a conservative paper (note I no longer even capitalize “conservative” in their case).
