Just like the so-called “vaccine,” GraniteGrok has been ahead of the NH media with honest reporting about Paxlovid, another expensive EUA drug from Pfizer that doesn’t work on COVID. It doesn’t clear the virus, and (irony alert) Tony Fauci is one of its latest victims.
“After I finished the five days of Paxlovid, I reverted to negative on an antigen test for three days in a row,” Fauci said Tuesday in a remote interview during the Foreign Policy’s Global Health Forum.
“And then on the fourth day, just to be absolutely certain, I tested myself again. I reverted back to positive.”
“It was sort of what people are referring to as a Paxlovid rebound,” Fauci said. Over the next day, he began to feel “really poorly,” and “much worse than in the first go-around,” he added.
Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D., writing at the Defender, reports that the Federal government spent 10.6 billion on Paxlovid to make it “free” and “available” to any American who wanted it (on the spot)!
Biden said he ordered “millions of pills” from Pfizer, paid for by U.S. tax dollars, to allow them to be passed out “for free.”
Dr. David Gortler, pharmacologist, pharmacist, FDA and healthcare policy oversight fellow and FDA reform advocate at the Ethics and Public Policy Center think tank in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday questioned why the government continues to invest in Paxlovid, given what he called the drug’s “lackluster” performance.
And Sununu couldn’t sign off on Ivermectin dispensed with a standing order?
Who Knew
Our local ABC affiliate, WMUR, has one piece on Paxlovid. In that piece, “State epidemiologist Dr. Benjamin Chan said Paxlovid is the more effective of the two, but its supply is more limited. It’s currently at 20 pharmacies in New Hampshire but will be at most Walgreens locations in the coming weeks.”
Health officials said the medications were bought by the federal government, so they should be free. The antiviral pills are intended for people who test positive for COVID-19 who are at risk of developing severe illness.
The less effective pill, according to Dr. Chan, is Molnupiravir. Given his record on COVID, I have to wonder if Merck’s Molnupiravir is better or worse than Paxlovid.
Over at New Hampshire’s largest daily newspaper, the Union Leader, there are several articles that mention Paxlovid (mostly from Reuters). I didn’t read them but check out a few of these headlines.
- Pfizer trials find antiviral pill cuts risk of severe COVID-19 by 89%
- Pfizer files for US authorization of promising COVID-19 antiviral pill
- FDA authorizes Pfizer’s anti-covid pill as omicron surges
- Pfizer oral COVID-19 pill gets US authorization for at-home use
- Where to find Paxlovid once you’ve tested positive for Covid
Vegas odds there’s nothing negative in there?
A search of both portals for ‘Paxlovid Rebound’ produced no results, but Fauci talks about this as if people have known about it and that’s true. We learned about it back in April. So, unless you rely on WMUR, the Union Leader, and likely every other newspaper in the Granite State, it isn’t a mystery.
And how about The NH Bulletin, which just won ten NH Media awards for something or other. They have two pieces that include mentions of Paxlovid – but have nothing about the issues with the EUA drug or rebound.
How about NH Journal? Zero results for Paxlovid and why not, no one in NH politics is talking about how this is for emergency use, cost you another 10.6 billion, and it doesn’t work.
I guess that’s why you are here. Someone has to care about the truth even if they have to report it in their spare time. But it should be all of them. Fauci is 81, quadruple vaxxed, and Paxlovid gave him worse symptoms than before he took it. If public health is that important, shouldn’t Dr. Chan, WMUR, the Union Leader, or the other watchdogs in the media have something to say?
I thought we were all in this together. Or did you just mean the confidence scam and money laundering operation?
