I just heard on Meet the Press (yeah, but nothing else was on) that in toto, we will have spent about $3.2 billion this year on elections. That is a staggering amount of money. Certainly the TEA Party related amounts, given in normally small donations, have been the big surprise this year. Given the "final nail in Conservativism coffin" that the Left crowed about (even as the same was said for the Left during Bush), this two year old movement has been the surprise of recent political history.
With the Citizens United decision by the Supreme Court that allowed corporations to "speak" for their own self-interests, coupled with enthusiasm gap, the Progressives are wailing – who is giving the money??? They forget one thing – they’ve owned the Presidency, the House, and the Senate for the last two years – if they REALLY wanted to put the stopper back in the bottle, they could.
Simple fact: they don’t want to. Of course they don’t! They won’t tell you and they will hide behind the veil of disclosure for two mere reasons:
- they wish to appear to be "for the little guy" in this area – even as they deconstruct, for example here in NH, the Right To Know law (elsewhere, known as FOIA, Freedom of Information Act).
- they aren’t getting the same amount of money, the same way, this cycle
And it is those last two words, this cycle, that makes the difference. The Dems know…

Ryan Williams (GOP Spokesperson) just pulled a Kathy Sullivan. He’s filed a complaint with the AG over an out of state Ad attacking John Stephen. The democrats of course think this is hypocritical, you know, to act just like they do. And maybe it is. Or maybe Kathy is afraid Ryan will get an overflowing complaint drawer at the AG’s office just like hers.
If New Hampshire only had one person in their workforce, and they had a job, unemployment would be at 0%. Keep that in mind as John Lynch and the democrats short-stroke the September adjusted jobs number around as a sign that they are good for the economy. They are not.
Carol Shea-Porter is earning over 170,000.00 dollars per year as a member of the US House. (That’s $120,000.00 more per year than the national average for the rest of us.) Her husband, whose income remains a mystery–perfectly legal as I understand it–has an extensive military background (for which he deserves our thanks) and appears to be employed by the government as well. So it is safe to say that he’s making good money. In fact, odds are good he is making twice as much as his private sector counterpart.