Democrats are idiots, and not shy about it. Look at them, ranting about how the Supreme Court will overturn Roe and whatever follows matters not one bit. Why? Because it is ignorant, stupid garbage. This happens every time a Republican nominates someone to the High Court as does having to talk about this.
Related: If Abortion is Only 3% of Your Business Why Did You Stop Asking for Title X Funding?
Oct 2012:
The fundamental truth about Roe v. Wade is that more than 30 states had abortion laws before the decision, with others considering them. Laws providing for abortion services existed without Roe v. Wade. And if Roe were struck down tomorrow, we would still have 50 states (and the District of Columbia), all of which have their own existing laws on abortion.
June 2018:
What happens if the light of day shines so bright that the shadows of the penumbras are not as visible as they were forty-plus years ago? What if SCOTUS can’t find the right to terminate a pregnancy in the constitution?
Whatever the current law is in your state right now will continue to be the current law in your state. Nothing changes if Roe v. Wade is tossed in the dustbin of history.
July 2018:
Roe has risen from the grave to sharpen the liberal spears as they prepare for another Borking of a Supreme Court nominee. And while I’ve already set the table for why dumping Roe would change nothing about either abortion or women’s health care the day after, the left will persist.
I’ve more examples, but in the interest of brevity and an eye toward ending the epic redundancy, that’s plenty.
September 2020: The same idiot leftists are invoking the same fear to no end. But the Granite State has some of the most liberal laws on abortion in the nation. You Need a License to Shampoo Her Hair but Not to Perform Her Abortion. Scrapping Roe won’t change any of that.
So, as the Democrat Borking of Amy Coney Barrett consumes the news cycle, remember, no matter how she votes, it is irrelevant to existing abortion law in any state. All it does is allow the free people in those states to decide what it means to them, including whether they should have to pay for it with their tax dollars. Money that ends up in Democrat campaign coffers.
One more point. To the best of my knowledge, I have never once commented via Twitter on account of Sherry Frost. So, the only possible explanation for why she would block me is that she does not want me reporting on what she tweets.
According to a US Circuit Court.
“…the First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilizes a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise-open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees.”
All 400 NH House Reps, 24 State Senators, the Governor, and five executive councilors engage in conduct as elected officials that impact every citizen’s life, regardless of where in the state they live. Someone with the time and desire could bring legal action against you.
Lying repeatedly about the impact of Roe on States might be the least of their problems.
