
After I posted a quote from the Economist regarding flat temperatures over the past 15 years, one of the commenters on that post went all 97% on me. What is that? It is the years old, pre-programmed, AWG/Media narrative response to any challenger (see ‘denier’) of the so-called settled science of human driven climate change.
But the number is based on a bad survey, poorly employed, and aggressively tweaked, based on a sliver of respondents, from only a few countries, who just happened to pick the correct answers, to achieve a desired outcome– much like the so-called science of Global Warming itself. (Delete the emails, hide the decline, block opposing research!).
Having invoked the 97% fraud discussion was no longer going to be an option.







