Jihad has arrived in New Hampshire: “From the river to the sea…”

pro Hamas rally

January 10, 2009. Elm Street- Manchester, NH. Teaching the community about their religion?

The Union Leader published a story this week about the progress of the mosque construction in Manchester, in which one of its supporters says,

"For us, it’s a place where we can gather together to teach our kids about our religion and teach the community about our religion,"

I thought it would be good to remind readers of two posts here on the ‘Grok regarding this subject from several years back, one noting "There’s always a mosque," in which author and expert Michael Ledeen wrote

Look at the 9/11 terrorists, look at the killer of Daniel Pearl, and you will find well-off, educated men who became radicalized in a mosque. And I’ll bet you a good-sized farm that if we ever get to the bottom of 9/11 we’ll discover that mosques were central in maintaining contact with and discipline over the terrorists.

So mosques can be very dangerous places when the local imam preaches jihadism, as is done in the thousands of Saudi-sponsored Wahhabi mosques all over the world, including the United States.

And the other stating the case as to why we should be wary of the spread of Islam and its attendant mosques in the light of the September 11 attacks:

Time after time, each occurrence of successful or thwarted terror strikes here in the West have had a common ingredient: a mosque or Islamic “center” with radicalized members being “mentored” by “imams” and other so-called “holy” men. Knowing this, why would we want something like this here in NH? It is no secret that, at such places, dangerous and hate-filled propaganda is often repeated and disseminated by radical speakers and “preachers” during religious “services.” Additionally, we’ve all heard the numerous stories noting that many mosques and shrines have been used throughout the Moslem world as ammo dumps and hideouts for murderous thugs. 

The enemy in the new world war that we find ourselves fighting is based upon the spread of a radical fascist ideology, much like Nazism- only worse. The Germans found their wellspring of support generated from hyper-nationalism and racism, fueled by a charismatic leader. Today’s enemy, the so-called “Islamo- fascists,” have added another extremely potent feature to the totalitarian mix: religious fervor. Now, I am not saying that all Muslims are terrorists, but I can make a case that most terrorists are Muslims.

Until we come up with foolproof methods of detection and eradication of the lethal threat to our country, I think it’s best to take extra-ordinary precautions. Each new mosque built in America represents a potential enemy outpost and launching pad for new attacks.

Not to mention that, unfortunately, a population of non-terrorist, peaceful persons in significant numbers  provides great cover for the would-be bad guys– especially if those who might have an inkling of untoward activities look the other way– or are too busy bagging on the Jews to take notice.

The twin story to the rise of the Granite State’s first permanent mosque is the advent of pro-Hamas, anti-Israel rallies on the streets of New Hampshire– one such event is depicted in the photo at the top of this post. Such activities have finally caught the attention of Granite Staters, some of whom having decided to push back, some, as individuals, and others, in the form of a group, like our friends, the Granite State Patriots. How can it be that ANY rational person could condone the continued terrorist and rocket attacks against the innocent civilian people in Israel?

In a recent email following last weekend’s antiwar rally and the counter-demonstration put on by patriotic Americans, one of the peaceniks asked Patriot leader Jack Kimball,

Do you categorize those who are opposed to the war(s)* as pro-terrorist? Those who are opposed to the Israel/Palestine conflict are pro-Hamas? This is a false dichotomy ie, more than two positions exist.

Really? Let’s consider a January 10th rally that occured in front of Jeanne Shaheen’s US Senate office on Elm Street in Manchester as recounted by a city resident who also provided all the pictures used in this posting.

pro Hamas rally

What IS their position, then, if not pro-Hamas, anti Israel?

If these people are for something else than the destruction and elimination of Israel as we know it, than please, clue me in. That this anti-Israel hatred has been brought into this country by these people– some of whom are "refugees" of such hatred in their land of origin– is nothing short of criminal. They are planting the seeds of future unrest right here on the streets of New Hampshire. The question is this– what will the addition of a permanent mosque do to the present situation?

Here’s the story:

Read more

Spending/Tax Cap Momentum Builds

Claremont and Somersworth File for 2009 Spending Cap Vote  Nashua, NH – Today, Claremont resident Cynthia Howard in association with the New Hampshire Advantage Coalition (NHAC) filed a petitioner’s committee affidavit with the Claremont City Clerk to begin the petition process for a spending/tax cap charter amendment for the city’s budget.  On Tuesday March 10th, … Read more

Watch the Magic Obama as he pulls an economic “fix” out of his hat…

Magic Obama

The FreeDictionary.com defines the word “bailout” as “a rescue from financial difficulties.” That was the term used to describe the initial government action and spending that occurred while Bush was still in office. We were told at the time that the $750 billion raised and appropriated by Congress at the behest of the President and his folks at the Treasury was to prime the pump so that cash-strapped banks and other institutions could begin lending again—entities deemed by the government “too big to fail.” And of course, it seemed plausible—and I only use that word with reservation—that because many of the lending institutions were in a jam due to failed mortgages and other similar loans (otherwise known as “toxic assets”) mostly due to government rules and regulations as dictated through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, they (the government) help clean up the mess. Of course, when the government gives out money, it comes from you and me.

And once the financial industry got their hands on this “bailout” money, other industries—most noticeably the automobile industry—decided to follow suit and came calling with outstretched hand looking for some, too. A business model based upon endless credit to keep production going to pay for expenses incurred previously and no cushion to fall back on, coupled with labor unions unwilling to give the slightest concession, is nothing more than the proverbial “sword of Damocles,” ready to drop at the first wrinkle. In this case, when the credit markets dried up, so did auto sales, as many people suddenly lost the ability to borrow because there was no money left to lend. At this point, we know that a “small” amount “bailout” funds have been funneled to the automakers, but we still hear that several are on the brink and in need of much more. The question is whether more money will really help fix the problem, or simply perpetuate systemic problems for another day? The same question applies to the financial institutions noted above.

As we moved down the road from the Bush Administration to the Obama Administration, it appeared that the word and notion of a “bailout” lost its luster. Time for a new word… The FreeDictionary.com defines “stimulus” as “something that acts as an incentive to (someone).” As you all know, following the bailout came the “stimulus” with a promise to “jump start” the economy. I guess it only seemed right—if “priming the pump” didn’t work, a “jump start” would come next. Of course, what came next was the stock market continued to tank and peoples’ money continued to evaporate—along with even more jobs. It seemed that the only good thing about “stimulus” was that it made for good fodder for jokes.

“Yo, Doug, feelin’ ‘stimulated’ today?” Of course the answer is, “Not really. But I AM getting bleeped…”

Uh-oh– Time for ANOTHER new word… and fast! Enter the term “recovery.” Ah yes, a much more positive word. Maybe this will be the one that gets the job done for Team Obama as they seek to “fix” the economy. Again, let us turn to the FreeDictionary.com, which defines “recovery” as “the regaining of something lost.” How perfect. As the government continues to dole out our children’s grandchildren’s great grandchildren’s money hand over fist, it can now claim to do so all in the name of going back to the way things were. Or something like that…

 

Read more

The. Worst. Moderator. Ever.

I got this from our friends at the CNHT. I used to think that George Roberts of Gilmanton was the worst Town moderator ever (He botched up the ballots at a vote so bad one year– the year that the Town of Gilmanton appeared to have passed SB2– that the vote total could never be … Read more

With Republican Senators like these, who needs Democrats?

. I got an email from Arnie Arnesen the other day pointing me towards this rather telling piece about our senior Senator Judd Gregg. While she was writing in the context of whether Senator Gregg would follow through with his ongoing support of the Magic Obama and vote to pass the so-called "stimulus," ready to … Read more

“Our enemies are patient, and determined to strike again…”

President Bush with military families
President George W. Bush consoles Ronald Klopf and Lisa West-Klopf, both of Aguanga, Calif., during a gathering of military support organizations Tuesday, Sept. 18, 2007. Their son, Lance Cpl. Jeromy West, was killed November of 2006 while serving with the U.S. Marines in Iraq.

Something tells me it won’t be long before many people will miss President Bush. Say what you will about the guy… he has exuded nothing but class right to the end. There’ll be no vandalized keyboards or stolen Air Force One china this time…

Here’s the transcript of President Bush’s final radio address:

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. For the last eight years, I have had the honor of speaking to the American people Saturday mornings through this radio address. In hundreds of broadcasts, I have talked to you about important issues affecting our security and our prosperity. And today, in my final address, I want to send a simple and heartfelt message: Thank you.

Eight years ago, Laura and I left our home in Texas to come to Washington. Through two terms in the White House, we have been blessed by your kind words and generous prayers. We have been inspired by those of you who reach out to feed the hungry, clothe the needy, and care for the sick. We have been moved by the courage and devotion of those of you who wear the uniform. Serving as your President has been an incredible honor.

Like every individual who has held this office before me, I have experienced setbacks. There are things I would do differently if given the chance. Yet I’ve always acted with the best interests of our country in mind. I have followed my conscience and done what I thought was right. You may not agree with some tough decisions I have made. But I hope you can agree that I was willing to make the tough decisions.

The decades ahead will bring more hard choices for our country, and there are some guiding principles that should shape our course. While our Nation is safer than it was seven years ago, the gravest threat to our people remains another terrorist attack. Our enemies are patient, and determined to strike again. America did nothing to seek or deserve this conflict. But we have been given solemn responsibilities, and we must meet them. We must resist complacency. We must keep our resolve. And we must never let down our guard.

At the same time, we must continue to engage the world with confidence and clear purpose. In the face of threats from abroad, it can be tempting to seek comfort by turning inward. But we must reject isolationism and its companion, protectionism. Retreating behind our borders would only invite danger. In the 21st century, security and prosperity at home depend on the expansion of liberty abroad. If America does not lead the cause of freedom, that cause will not be led.

 

Read more

Tea-Time on Meet the New Press radio. Tea PARTY time, that is…

We’re mad as heck and we’re not gonna take it any more! Starting Saturday morning at 9 am! As usual, this week’s broadcast version of GraniteGrok and AnkleBitingPundits brings an array of items and guests for your consideration– ALL STARTING AT 9AM! As always, thanks to the technical wizardry and analytical skills of Skip, if you are … Read more

Role and Responsibility of the State Republican Committee Chairman

Role and Responsibility of the State Republican Committee Chairman

Although there is not a written “job description” for our State Party Chairman, there are many references in our bylaws to the Chairman and his/her duties and scope of authority.  In addition to filling these requirements there are other qualities that would be desirable in a Chairman.  Here are a few of my thoughts on what we might look for in a State Chairman.

It is necessary that the Chairman, as the representative of the party, be a person who would be well-spoken and articulate and able to speak intelligently and competently on the issues, to all the media, as well as be able to debate one-on-one with the Democrat State Chairman. Priority should be given to holding the Democrats feet to the fire and making sure they are accountable to the public for their actions on every level.  This needs to be a continual and consistent effort on the Chairman’s part.

The Chairman should work with the E-Board to set fundraising and recruitment goals and develop a strategy for reaching them. The Chairman would have to, with input from the Board, develop and frame our ‘message’ and get it before the public in every way, including utilizing technology and the latest communication programs and hardware.  In doing so we must have a person who believes in and supports our party platform and will take the leadership in promoting it and facilitating, in any way possible, the prosecution of Republican core beliefs and guiding principles.

Besides the ability to listen to, and respectfully relate to, the members and the public, the Chairman would have to either possess organization skills or have someone on the staff that does. They should demonstrate a willingness and ability to delegate tasks and authority to members and committees, and a desire to work openly and cooperatively with the Executive Board. Hopefully the Chairman would have an ‘open door’ policy where input, ideas, criticism, complaints, suggestions, and recommendations would be received in a respectful and welcoming manner.

Recognizing that the State Committee is essentially a volunteer organization, as the leader of the State Republican Party, the Chairman should work to build a team and foster  loyalty through encouraging efforts, acknowledging successes, and giving praise and recognition to those who work tirelessly for the party by giving their time, money, and energy.  It’s important not to waste talent, skills or enthusiasm. The Chairman must help and assist county and city chairmen in their rolls.  And all members must be asked and offered an opportunity to contribute to our efforts in whatever way they are willing and able.

If under fire by the Democrats or the press, the Chairman, as our champion and our leader, should come to the defense and support of any member of the board or committee. Should the Chairman have any problem or difference with a member they should be dealt with privately with the individual.

Finally, the Chairman, in his or her role as a member of the Republican National Committee must work closely with the National Committeeman and National Committeewoman as a team to maximize our power and effectiveness in representing New Hampshire’s interests on the RNC, including, but not limited to, preserving our First in the Nation Primary status.

Phyllis Woods, NH RNC National Committeewoman

 
NH GOP By Laws pertaining to the State Chairman after the jump

Read more

If it’s Saturday, it’s time to “Meet the New Press”

Starting Saturday morning at 9 am! As usual, this week’s broadcast version of GraniteGrok and AnkleBitingPundits brings an array of items and guests for your consideration– ALL STARTING AT 9AM! As always, thanks to the technical wizardry and analytical skills of Skip, if you are beyond the broadcast area of Newstalk 1490 WEMJ, simply click here … Read more

Meet the New Press radio- an island of last resort…

Starting Saturday morning at 9 am! As usual, this week’s broadcast version of GraniteGrok and AnkleBitingPundits brings an array of items and guests for your consideration– ALL STARTING AT 9AM! As always, thanks to the technical wizardry and analytical skills of Skip, if you are beyond the broadcast area of Newstalk 1490 WEMJ, simply click here … Read more

Update on the race for RNC Chair

This is to give you an update on the happenings at the RNC. I will be in D.C. on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday of next week.  On Monday, Grover Norquist’s group, Americans For Tax Reform, is hosting a debate for the candidates for RNC Chairman on Monday at the Press Club.  If you’d like to … Read more

Unity

We would like to welcome Phyllis Woods to the ‘Grok.  She is a long time Republican activist who is currently New Hampshire’s National Committeewoman to the GOP’s Republican National Committee.  She has seen some of my writings here on the ‘Grok and elsewhere about where the GOP should be fixing itself.  I offered – she agreed to post her thoughts here from time to time!  Thanks, Phyllis!

There are several things Republicans will need to do to take back our state and win in 2010 and I’d like to address them each in separate submissions.  The first, and most essential, is to unite our party.  While this may seem obvious, it’s harder than it would seem.  Republicans are not used to being in the minority.  The Democrats are very good at voting and walking in lock-step, something that’s important if you want to accomplish anything when you are greatly outnumbered.  Republicans are used to being diversified, thinking for themselves, and following their own agendas.  We cannot afford that luxury any longer.  We can’t afford to lose a single legislator’s vote on important issues and we will all have to pull together in a united effort to achieve any success even if it only means we’re able to stop some of the detrimental initiatives we know will be presented.  But even more important, all of us will need to hang together in order to have any strength and to make progress in the State GOP over the next two years.

Our county caucuses have been held to choose the future members of our state party.  Recently our State Chairman was quoted in the press saying that we shouldn’t say that some Republicans are ‘good ‘ Republicans and other Republicans are ‘bad’ Republicans.  Agreed, however, in another newspaper he is quoted as saying of one of the caucus elections, that a lot of ‘good’ Republicans were thrown off the committee, presumably to be replaced by ‘bad’ Republicans.  What needed to be stressed is that we have turnover in our membership every two years which is a good thing as it brings in new people into the process.  If some ‘good’ Republicans lost their bid for re-election, they were replaced with other ‘good’ Republicans were they not?

It’s time to…

Read more

Meet the New Press radio. Just havin’ some Saturday morning fun…

Starting Saturday morning at 9 am! As usual, this week’s broadcast version of GraniteGrok and AnkleBitingPundits brings an array of items and guests for your consideration– ALL STARTING AT 9AM! As always, thanks to the technical wizardry and analytical skills of Skip, if you are beyond the broadcast area of Newstalk 1490 WEMJ, simply click here … Read more

Can they do that?

Once again it’s budget time for most towns and counties here in the Granite State. As most folks are busy preparing for the Christmas season, important decisions are being made that will determine how much money will be taken from property-taxpayers’ paychecks and savings and delivered to local governments. That’s right—being that we pay for … Read more

New Hampshire Advantage Coalition Vows to Fight for Tax Cap

Our friends at the NH Advantage Coalition forwarded their reaction to the news that the City of Concord wants the Courts involved in the successfully petitioned tax cap proposal: Concord, NH-Despite being reviewed and approved by 3 state agencies, and the ballot group who put the initiative up for referendum bending over backwards to oblige the … Read more

Meet the New Press radio: Mounting a spirited defense against the barbaric hordes…

Starting Saturday morning at 9 am! As usual, this week’s broadcast version of GraniteGrok and AnkleBitingPundits brings an array of items and guests for your consideration– ALL STARTING AT 9AM! As always, thanks to the technical wizardry and analytical skills of Skip, if you are beyond the broadcast area of Newstalk 1490 WEMJ, simply click here … Read more

Share to...