US Capitol Building Original Photo by Andy Feliciotti on Unsplash

Welcome to the No-Party Party

I have lately been forced to shed an illusion I’ve been enjoying for the last 5 or 6 years. Namely, that the Republican Party has a serious prospect of guiding America.

Read more

Unhinged Democrats

Democrat Dementia Propaganda

The Democrat (Dem) party in the United States is led by a bunch of octogenarians who have slipped into the early stages of dementia. This is widely understood by anyone with a clear perspective and a reasoning mind.

Read more

10th Amendment

A Case for the States

As I think many fellow Americans can agree the United States finds itself in troubling territory, and the prospects for the future do not look good. It is a fact that the United States will not last forever, John Adams said in 1814 “Remember Democracy never lasts long.

Read more

US Capitol Bldg behind security fence

The Federal Workforce Must Be Cleaned Out

When people throw around the term Deep State it is instantly polarizing. Two camps emerge — in one, there are those who really don’t pay too much attention to politics or the actual functions of the state: defending the country, upholding a free and fair market, and managing the government’s day-to-day bureaucracy however large or small.

Read more

Sun King Sununu

The Governor Has Already Suspended State Law Once to Satisfy the Fed’s “Boiler-Plate” Language…

In the angst over the two or three loud-mouths who shut down the Executive Council meeting at Saint Anselm College on Wednesday, we should not overlook the real issue underlying the emotion.  Just as the Biblical figure Esau traded his sacred birthright for a bowl of stew, so too was the State of New Hampshire about to trade away its sovereignty for $27M in federal grants.

Read more

Notable Quote – George Will, Prof. Don Boudreaux

Can a federal government that acknowledges no limits to its scope, and that responds promiscuously to the multiplying appetites of proliferating factions, make choices that serve the society’s long-term interests? The answer, based on the avalanche of evidence from current governance, is an emphatic “no.” The evidence is in the rise of the administrative state … Read more

gender vs sex

So Trump is going to reverse Obama’s re-definition of what gender is?

Hey, it was the Progressives that decided that gender had nothing to do with the chromosomes you had and only depended on the thoughts in your head and went ahead and decided to redefine our common language (AHgain!) in support of their agenda in wiping out all traditional values and view points.  Now, wait for Progressive and Gender Warrior heads to ‘splode in 3…2…1…

‘Transgender’ Could Be Defined Out of Existence Under Trump Administration

The Trump administration is considering narrowly defining gender as a biological, immutable condition determined by genitalia at birth, the most drastic move yet in a governmentwide (sic) effort to roll back recognition and protections of transgender people under federal civil rights law.

Funny, we’ve had the definition of gender as your biological sex for thousands of years.  The redefinition has only been in force for a few so after a mere handful of years of redefining it as NOT that, this is “drastic“? Just like what the Left did with the fundamental definition of what marriage was? Yet another case of the Left having a hissy fit because they aren’t getting their way?  How DARE we!

Read more

About that “Free Money” From Washington…

You’ve heard it time and again. Some state or local official promotes a project or a legisaltive initiative because there’s a federal grant available. These sorts of  “thinkers” will often implement long-term programs at great expense based on promises of “free money.” The Federal government is paying X percent of costs for Y number of years.

How can we pass that up?

Read more

Notable Quote – On “Reorganizing” the Republican Party

“…it is probably enough to observe here that in the nature of things the exercise of personal government, the control of a huge bureaucracy, and the management of an enormous mass of subsidized voting-power, are as agreeable to one stripe of politician as they are another.  Presumably they interest a Republican or Progressive as much … Read more

Carol Shea-Porter: The Federal Governments Representative To New Hampshire CD- 1

I have long and often argued that Democrats, New Hampshire’s variety in particular, favor the top down model of governance.  The power and the resources (money) must descend from the point farthest from the person who is taxed for the privilege of being governed by progressives.

A prime example or proof of this “theory” is the desire to “get back” tax dollars from Washington DC.  Democrats argue that we need representatives to go to Washington who will work hard to get back the money we send to the nations capital as federal taxes.   But they have it exactly backwards.  We send representatives to the nations capital to do everything in their power to keep the money in New Hampshire in the first place.

The contrast between the two could not be more stark.

Read more

Share to...