Tony Fauci is very excited. “I am honored to announce that the United States will remain a member of the World Health Organization.” Does that mean he’ll publicly embrace the message that a positive PCR test does not mean you have COVID19? Or, this from Dr. Layla McCay from the NHS.
Related: WHO – Positive PCR Test Does Not Mean You Have COVID19
“It is correct that in hospital, people who tested positive for COVID will be the full range of symptoms,” McCay said. “Some will have it as an aside to some other problem for which they’re in the hospital.”
We know this has happened in the United States from the beginning. We knew the PCR test was faulty long before the WHO announced it last week. And we watched as anyone who dared tell these truths was pilloried, censored, fired, or de-platformed.
What a difference an inauguration makes.
Dr. Judy Mikovits, Dr. Simone Gold, America’s Frontline Doctors – Dr. Bob Hamilton, Dr. Stella Emmaneul, Dr. Dan Erickson, Dr. James Todaro, Dr. Joe Ladapo, and others. They were all correct.
From HCQ efficacy to distancing to mask-wearing, to false positives, to medical acts of fraud (for cash from the government), to low viral load in kids and the asymptomatic, to over-cycled PCR tests that create false positives, to the destruction of lives and livelihoods.
Will any of the sheep-mongered fearful notice or believe?
Will they recall that the New York Times published a piece we flagged late last summer as setting the groundwork for admitting the PCR test was crap. That many of the “positives” are not. “The standard tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus.” Amounts that would require neither masks nor distancing and certainly not quarantine.
These are all foregone conclusions to those of us incorrectly labeled as anti-maskers (we’ve always said you can mask up and quarantine yourself, leave us alone). Science deniers, they call us. But now what?
Their science politics is trying to catch up with our science.
How do they intend to deal with that conundrum?
They’ll call us domestic terrorists when it is, in fact, they who are thus. But then, that was always the case.
