So, how come this doesn’t work with Education?

by

“We should be working to make sure that high quality health care is provided to the uninsured to make sure the full range of health care services, including family planning services that are available to people with money are available to the poor and uninsured as well,” Nadler said.

That would be Congressman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) and a member of the Progressive Caucus and a member of the Democratic Socialists of America stating that Planned Parenthood should have an abortion clinic in every neighborhood.  So, who’s YOUR Dr. Gosnell, convicted baby killer, going to be?

But that’s beside the point – the real issue is this: “that are available to people with money are available to the poor“.  So, according to this Socialist, life is unfair because the poor do not have the same access to abortion as those evil rich people (er, I’m quite sure Nadler’s net worth is way more than most of us).  So, he’s quite happy to take money from others to give abortions to the poor.  But that raises a question – an important question

“Yes” for abortion (a choice) that would end a life, but always a “No!” for educational / school choice in giving a child a better life?

Umm, so why the double standard, Mr. Socialist?  Why is ending a life “a public good” when a “better education” is not?

Ah yes, Progressive value in one, and Progressive control in the other.  Yeah, that explains the hypocrisy.

Author

  • Skip

    Co-founder of GraniteGrok, my concern is around Individual Liberty and Freedom and how the Government is taking that away. As an evangelical Christian and Conservative with small "L" libertarian leanings, my fight is with Progressives forcing a collectivized, secular humanistic future upon us. As a TEA Party activist, citizen journalist, and pundit!, my goal is to use the New Media to advance the radical notions of America's Founders back into our culture.

    View all posts
Share to...