Then NH House Rep. Cindy Rosenwald used to let out-of-state campaign workers use her home address to vote in Nashua. The Democrat then got herself a promotion when she was elected to the State Senate. This has addled her already questionable mental health, a problem she shares with her party in general.
Democrats are nuts.
Take the recent press conference protestations over Republican spending. The party that can only spend and tax more to grow its precious government is acting like Republicans are wasteful spenders. The republican reps are not all brilliant at accounting (just look at the CTEHR scandal), but they are frugal compared to the proglodytes. (Related: Remembering Democrat Rule In New Hampshire – In The Beginning…)
Democrat majorities always overestimate revenue projections on purpose and invite bloated budgets. They then allocate (spend) the guess and when it comes up short as it must, cry about the need to raise taxes to fund spending that would never have happened had they not looked to the sky on revenue projections. (Related: Blood and Water – The Return of Democrat Rule in New Hampshire)
Rosenwald herself has a historic place in this confidence scam. After the 2010 Tea Party rebellion, Dems found themselves in the super-minority where they watched Republicans cut close to a billion dollars out of the Dem’s previous state budget. The left insisted this was catastrophic and that the structural deficit was a myth. Rosenwald, then an NH House Rep admitted it was real and not a myth, probably without meaning too.
“The federal money was one-time assistance. The Democratic majority knew all along it would not continue, and that budget cuts would have to be made during the following biennium so that there would not be a deficit.” …
You said the 800 million dollar deficit was a myth. Then you admit that democrats needed $802 million in one time money the state did not have to pay for their spending. Then you say the Democrat majority knew that budget cuts would have to be made during the following biennium so that there would not be a deficit. Not be a deficit. Not be a deficit?
So…..If Democrats knew there was going to be an 800 million dollar deficit how can the 800 million dollar deficit be a myth?
If Democrats had retained the majority, they would have raised taxes. Democrats don’t cut spending. They come up with LLC and tent taxes in the wee hours of the morning. They sell a section of highway between state departments and pretend this is a net plus to offset their spending. Or they add a long list of fees which they do not call taxes but that are. (Related: Remembering Democrat Rule Part 2)
New Hampshire Democrats have no credibility on budgets and spending and never have so any protestations are a load of crap, and that’s an easy thing to work out. If the spending is so irresponsible, ask them what they’d cut. What does your budget look like as opposed to the alleged drunk sailors.
It’s bigger, fatter, and filled with tripwires, traps, and a future in which more of the same is guaranteed. For Democrats there is no such thing as enough of someone else’s money.
