Carol Scold-Porter – can she even get it right closing the door behind her?

 

Leave it to Carol to get it wrong on the way to the EXIT door:

FRIDAY UPDATE: BACKING TAX CUTS. Outgoing Democratic U.S. Reps. Carol Shea-Porter and Paul Hodes voted Thursday in favor of extending into 2011 the Bush tax cuts for incomes of less than $200,000 for individuals and less than $250,000 for families.

The bill passed the House, 234-188, but it was a largely symbolic vote because the plan would not pass the Senate as written because Republicans want the tax cuts continued for all American, regardless of income levels. Democrats, Republicans and the Obama administration are trying to work on a compromise on how to treat tax cuts for the wealthy.

In a brief statement, Shea-Porter noted that even under the bill passed on Thursday, "Everyone gets a tax cut up to $250,000, even the wealthiest Americans. But lower and middle class families truly need these tax cuts. This bill adds to the debt, but costs $700 billion less than the Republican proposal."

So, both Hodes and Scold_Porter decided that they would go down with the ship with respect to the Democrat Class Warfare Doctrine – "It’s really ours even if you earned it – get over it".  In effect, they have made their stand on "Obama’s Hill" in supporting the Obama Tax Hike of 2010; erect their political tombstones on the crest.

All men are created equal?  No, not in the eyes, hearts, and wallets vacuums of the Democrats.

To the end, Scold-Porter also stays true to her mantra that "the little people cannot do anything without Government".  This was the main point of her race with Congressman Guinta:

Read more

Accountability – next installment – the US House TEA Party Caucus

Gadsen FlagTEA Party: Taxes Enough Already.  A general philosophy that Government has become too enthralled with using other peoples’ money.  That it has become too big, too intrusive, too cumbersome, way too inefficient, and too far removed from the principles enshrined in our Founding documents: protecting individual Rights and property and a limited government.

Earmarks have certainly been in the news – those "small" incidentals added by our Federal legislators that tack on costs and direct spending. While small only in comparison with the humungeous Federal spending overall, they became a focal point as an indicator of the crass indifference to what most TEA Partiers believe to be the jobs to which these folks are elected.

First there was "November is coming".  Now, it is "Hold them Accountable", and indeed, we shall.  Especially true in the case of those legislators that have self-identified themselves aligned with TEA Party philosophy. 

In this case, of calling for "no earmarks" yet asking and receiving such.  Smooth move?  Not really, Jackson.  Sure, there are those within this caucus that have called for no earmarks and have walked the talk:

NAME AMOUNT
Bachmann (R-MN) 0
Broun (R-GA) 0
Burton (R-IN) 0
Coffman (R-CO) 0
Luetkemeyer (R-MO) 0
Lummis (R-WY) 0
Marchant (R-TX) 0
McClintock (R-CA) 0
Myrick (R-NC) 0
Neugebauer (R-TX) 0
P. Sessions (R-TX) 0
Pence (R-IN) 0
Roe (R-TN) 0
Shadegg (R-AZ) 0
T. Price (R-GA) 0
Westmoreland (R-GA) 0

But alas…

Read more

Liars!

Yes, the very tax cuts that did not even exist, the ones GWB screwed the Middle class out of for the better part of the decade, just appeared at the wave of a talking point memo, whipping out seven years of dishonest, backhanded, left wing class warfare rhetoric, simply because it had suddenly become politically convenient to have democrats extending something they insisted never even existed.

“RLCNH Declares War on Airport Molestation”

CONCORD, N.H.? The Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire (RLCNH) declared war today on humiliation and harassment of travelers at the Manchester-Boston Regional Airport, the state’s busiest air traffic hub….

Read more

This is what Democrats and other socialists fight against….

"The Upward Spiral of Capitalism." After watching the video below, we must ask ourselves: "Is the hatred of capitalism and freedom shown by statism and socialism a matter of blindness, ignorance, or malice?" WHY would anyone oppose such a humane and beneficial cultural and economic system? My guess is this: Capitalism empowers the masses with freedom while disempowering … Read more

Great, now even the NH House Speaker wants to add to my work burden…

Yet another person trying to tell us what to do!  From the Laconia Sun today (pg9), there was an article in which new NH House Speaker Bill O’Brien was outlining his vision: “Leave the disparagement, mistrust and indignation to the editorial pages and the blogs,” he said. That would be us….and the proper place as … Read more

What’s Greene Shaheen Up To?

corn snake
corn snake

Senator Shaheen has signed onto a letter to Senate Majority leader Reid and Minority leader McConnell, suggesting that the corn based ethanol mandates, and all the tariffs and protections associated with it, not be extended.  Your initial reaction might be surprise, but this is not in and of itself surprising.  Shaheen is on the record being against them since at least 2008 when she ran for the US Senate but not because she is against ethanol.  Her problem is the kind of ethanol, and so we can assume her co-signers have similar issues.

On the surface they are claiming to be against the law (the mandate) that props up ethanol on three fronts and also gives 31 billion dollars to the oil companies to offset the cost of forcing them to add ethanol to fossil based motor fuels.  I’m against corporate welfare so I can’t object to repeal even with ulterior motives, but this starts off as a calculated, backhanded poke in the eye, not just to the stupidity of the subsidy regime that liberals normally love, but to big oil.  And we should expect oil to get screwed. We should simply accept that even with repeal of the ethanol mandate, we could still see the government use other means of legislative or bureaucratic force to keep ethanol in the fuel supply and pass those costs off to the oil companies.  If they can screw oil and get what they really want along the way, that’s a dream come true to Progressives.  But what do these signers really want?

As usual, nothing in Washington is quite what it seems.

Read more

NoLabels, NoWay

I think I nailed it on the head (here) back on November 17th with my first impression of the group NoLabels.  But now that the Live Free or Die Alliance (LFDA), whom I have often opined springs from the same pedigree of liberal-fronted groups pretending to be middling ports of in-betweenedness in the political/ideological storm, is seeking the opinion of its members on NoLabels effort to penetrate New Hampshire, it is time to revisit this.

Let me save you the trouble of wondering what they are about.  I believe NoLabels goal is to shift the electorate to the left.  Their first, and so far only plank, is to open primaries to everyone who can vote.   Now ask yourself, who does that help?

It helps Democrats.

Read more

It’s Official!!

State Representative Bill O’Brien (R-Mt Vernon) was just elected as the Speaker of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, a positive step towards solid, consistent, Conservative leadership in New Hampshire’s government for the next 2 years.

Why Just One?

Question: If refusing to let one man “marry” another man violates his or their ‘civil rights’ then why is it not a violation of said same civil rights to then refuse to let one or both of them marry a second, third or forth man?

FaceBook Doodlings – what to cut?

 

OK, I got into Twitter because some of my Samsphere friends gave me a shove.  Did it for a while, but after a month or so, realized that while it works for a lot of folks, I still prefer blogging.   FaceBook was a similar thing – at first.  Now, I find that (perhaps), I spend more time than planned on keeping discussions going.  So, just like my Email Doodlings, there will be some reporting back here as well.  Note: minor reformatting and editing will be done to "bloggify" an FB comment thread.

Well, I think that Jim Bender (former candidate to be the Republican nominee for US Senator here in NH who I got the opportunity to talk to a lot) is becoming a bit of a Sarah Palin.  NO, he’s not going "girlie man"; rather, he throws something out on FB and a number of people break out into discussion mode.  On this thread, he simply put up a video Idiots guide to public sector that produces no wealth (11Nov10)  (Note: has been yanked from YouTube since Jim posted it).

Well, a few comments were made, and then The Challenge was made by one of the more liberal folks on that thread:

There’s certainly no doubt that republicans and democrats alike (or conservatives and liberals alike, if you prefer) have built an enormous, expensive and unwieldy government over the past 50 or more years; or that, as a county, we’ve been …living beyond our means (or at least beyond what we’ve been willing to pay for) for at least the past 30 years. It’s time to pay up, America.

Now the question is what to cut and I look forward to that debate. Waste, fraud and abuse is the popular refrain but, even if we eliminate that (which would amaze me), the effect will be negligible.

What substantial, popular programs will we eliminate?See More

And no one answered immediately; thus, The Goad was issued:

It seems the surest way to stifle a conversation about overgrown government is to try & bring it around to specifics.

C’mon, folks. No ideas?

Well, I’m never one to resist a challenge.  In fact, none of us on the Conservative side should EVAH back down or wimp out.  This is a Long War of what America should be – so fight I shall! 

OK, I’m game! Ground rules – It enhances:

  • Individual freedoms from the current structure

  • Decentralizes control back to more local control

  • Enhances accountability

Why shouldn’t Education be more localized than from DC? Has it (the Dept of Education) fulfilled its original mandate and given us better education outcomes for our students since its creation? Nope, Delete.

The EPA – has it fulfilled its original mandate?  Pretty much.  However,…

Read more

Food For Thought

Over here, you’ll find Senator Shaheen crowing about how great the new food safety bill is, and how she, Senator Jeanne Shaheen, helped pass it. (It’s crap like all the other dem bills but that’s not why she’s an ass.)
She is an ass because (and if it makes you feel better Judd Gregg is an ass for being both a co-sponsor and a yeah vote) there are provisions in this Senate bill (S510) that….raise taxes.

I didn’t know that Nepotism was a part of the Platform…

I have one thing to say – with the following news, and with other Movement Conservative names dropping out, it is time to say it:

Draft Jennifer Horn for NH GOP Chair

Haven’t paid the paywall price, but some of what Pindell has up is free for us poor eyeballs (emphasis mine):

James Sununu, a political and business consultant, is seriously considering a run for New Hampshire Republican Party Chair if his father John H. Sununu officially declines to seek another term, WMURPoliticalScoop.com has learned.

You know, way back when, I made no points with the Sununu clan when I pointed out that Shaheen was shaping the political battlefield as Son #1 did nothing for a campaign. Did that post spur him into finally turning on spigot in keeping his Senatorial seat?  Who knows?  Was his elongated silence as Shaheen clobbered him for a couple of months a factor in the race?  Most likely.  My post?  Hardly….other than it got picked up, at the time, by a couple of DC based publications.

Son #2 is now an Executive Councilor – congratulations (really!).  Serve well.

But this is a bit much. First Juliana Bergeron’s name was floated out as being "The Pick".  Now, Son #3’s name?  Another handpicked name for successor?  Let’s be fair – Gov. Sununu has done a lot of good work the last two years cleaning up the mess that the previous Chair left (fled?).  And the ‘Grok thanks him for it – with many thanks and heartily given.  But also "let’s be clear, here";…

Read more

I like this – a new Caucus in the NH House

Natural Rights Caucus

From our friend, Andrew Manuse:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 29, 2010
Media Contact: Andrew J. Manuse, spokesman, NRC

603-703-8857 or pr@naturalrightscaucus.org

FRESHMEN LEGISLATORS ORGANIZE NATURAL RIGHTS CAUCUS
Caucus to focus first on training lawmakers, then on uniting behind laws to secure individual rights

CONCORD, N.H.?A group of principled New Hampshire Legislators has organized a Natural Rights Caucus to ensure that an effective freshmen class can work with senior members to advance legislation that guarantees equal treatment under the law and defends individual rights to life, liberty and property.

The non-partisan Natural Rights Caucus, which will be narrowly focused on laws that advance the principles in Part I, Article 2 of the New Hampshire Constitution, held its first official meeting on Saturday, Nov. 27 in Concord to help freshmen members learn how to be successful in the House and Senate. Former Rep. Don Gorman, a four-term House member, led the training meeting that attracted a committed group of about 20 state Legislators during the Thanksgiving holiday weekend.

“It was very rewarding to lead a group of legislators who truly want to do what’s best for the people of New Hampshire,” Gorman said. “The dialogue was superior during the training session, and I’m confident this caucus is going to be influential in the state Legislature.”

To be clear, the Natural Rights Caucus will focus first on training its freshmen members leading up to the 2011-2012 Legislative session. Training will include lessons on proper decorum and rules of order, how to provide efficient testimony in committees, how to build effective coalitions, and how to avoid being intimidated or misled by senior members, agencies or lobbyists.

Members of the Natural Rights Caucus will then use their training to work as a voting bloc during the session. The caucus will be dedicated to preserving the rights of all New Hampshire citizens as articulated in Part I, Article 2 of the New Hampshire Constitution: “All men have certain natural, essential and inherent rights, among which are, the enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; and in a word, of seeking and obtaining happiness. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged on account of race, creed, color, sex or national origin.”

The Natural Rights Caucus was founded last week by Representatives-elect…

Read more

Progressives tell the lie that Capitalism is a form of Morality; it is not

(H/T: RightWingNews)

Many on the Left, the Progressives and the Socialists, wish to do away with capitalism.  Always, they run down the excesses of the capitalistic system and that it does not treat all people fairly.  They lie.

Their goal is to get YOU to believe as they do: that our capitalistic economic system is the same as a moral system.  They decry inequity in that some seem to benefit more than others.  They decry and infer that Capitalists only benefit by screwing over the poor.  Thus, they say that capitalism is a failed moral system because of this and MUST be thrown away and be replaced by one that is guided by technocrats that dispassionately decide what needs to be done by who and how much to have an ‘efficient society’.  And this is different from fascism (another name for state corporatism) – how? 

Failed moral system?  The whole premise is wrong from the get go – they just don’t want you to question it.  They want you to believe that…

Read more

Share to...