Guest Post by Dan Kanna:
Kathy Sullivan talks a great line about separation of powers and gay rights; but what is she really talking about? Whose power is she in favor of separating?
She correctly notes that we have 3 branches of power in the State government; but fails to mention that we have a compound republic (one with many parts), so the balance of power extends not just horizontally at the State level but vertically between the State, Federal, and local governments. This is called Federalism, and is the foundation of the Constitution for the United States of America.
The State Legislative and Executive branches are elected by the people whereas the Judicial branch is not. She would have us believe that all authority on the State Constitution should reside in the Judicial branch; an unelected and unaccountable branch of the State government where we the voters have zero input. Considering the Democrat party is also opposed to State sovereignty and wholeheartedly believes that we should be at the mercy of our Federal masters in Washington D.C., it seems to me that she is in favor of a separation of powers from the people of New Hampshire both horizontally and vertically. Who do the Democrats represent? Certainly not the voters of New Hampshire.
We as a people should start thinking in terms of this vertical balance of power; consider that New Hampshire has…
Disgraced left wing rube and soon-to-be former Pelosi-Party Representative to New Hampshire Carol SEIU-Porter hit the pages of this mornings Union Leader like fingernails on a chalkboard. But it is a familiar sound. In fact I believe she has just plagiarized her own 2006 campaign web site. We’ve got irresponsible spending, two wars we could not afford, I’m just itching to play the song ‘Reminiscing’ by the Little River Band while I read it.
More on the Omnibus Pork Spending Bill, from
"marked" and thus easily identified….marked for defeat and replacement in 2012. 