This was originally going to be a response to Radical Moderate’s comment on my Trumps’ Cognitive Dissonance post. But as I finished my reply, it looked a little too long, so I thought I’d just post it. By the way, after thinking about it a little, the title Cognitive Dissonance doesn’t quite fit in Trump’s case; that term implies that one holds simultaneous conflicting beliefs, and I’m not convinced of what Trump believes, if anything, other than in himself of course, so Cognitive Dissonance may be slightly off. But I digress.
Radical Moderate’s comment was (you can see it all here):
I think you may have forgot to post the link to the actual interview so Trump can ‘square it’ what he said in his own words.
He embedded the video clip from Fox here, then went on.
Trump’s explanation sounds like a reasonable explanation of eminent domain to me after all it is in the US Constitution by the authors themselves. If its not intended to be utilized in the limited way Trump explained then what should it be used for?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..
No didn’t forget. Oddly, I assumed someone capable of finding the Grok would be capable of finding the rambling incoherent fragmented word swamp that are Trump’s statements; as I see you have.
I’ll go with the assumption that the video he embedded has the crucial part. And to be fair, I should have included a reference to Kelo in the post. But have you ever tried to transcribe Trump? You need to be a punctuational gymnast to do it.
Read more