The only way to make sure you never get COVID is to get the jump off a cliff vaccine. Say what? Yes, jumping has a more than 99.9% chance of death (and the vaccine will do nothing to prevent it). COVID, on the other hand, has a 99.9% (ish) survival rate if you even ever catch it.
One of many elephants in the room is how few people actually test positive from the general population. Another is that the vaccine does nothing to keep you from getting it in the first place. In many cases, it gives you the flu you spent a year trying to avoid.
All the masking, distancing, the job, business, wealth and mental health destruction, education loss, and suicide. That was the price our nation paid to get an inoculation that could make you sick, give you complex and adverse short or long-term side-effects (no one actually knows the full extent), or that might push you off a cliff (as in, kill you).
Related: Op-Ed: These Are the Reasons I Will Not Be Taking the COVID Shots
I admit it’s a weird comparison, but I find it apt. People are lining up to get something they don’t need that will do next to nothing, but it could kill you.
There’s an “if someone told you to jump off a cliff” joke in there, but it’s not terribly funny. Nor is the fact that everyone has legal immunity but you.
Until now.
The US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has made it clear that not everyone is immune from prosecution.
From their FAQ.
If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable?
If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.
If your boss says you can’t work there unless you get The Jab™ and you get it, and get sick, or ill, or die (as a result), that’s a work-related injury. OSHA says the employer is on the hook for that.
It’s a small step in the right direction, but hardly enough. And I have low expectations as to its shelf-life. Being what it is these days, Congress will want to make some new rules or initiative a shake-up at OSHA if the White House isn’t in already on that.
And since OSHA ignored all of their own rules for PPE and work safety for a year, this liability FAQ thing could be heading for the nearest bureaucratic cliff. Unless they think they can quietly make a bunch of easy cash on fines or enforcement.
For now, use it to protect yourself if you can if you do not need or do not want this experimental inoculation.
HIPPA, the Nuremberg Code, and the Constitution should suffice, but we’ll take any help we can get.
HT | LifeSite News
