Kamala Harris is considered by some who follow the political gymnastics of self-proclaimed American socialists to be the candidate they’d prefer. Female, Young, of color, a Marxist. She has deep ties to the DSA and communist organizations.
Related: People In Power Will Try To Suppress Free Speech
Not sure I agree. But we talked about her on GrokTALK! this week (program release tomorrow), and while she could be a contender in a different year, Tulsi Gabbard nuked her in Dem Debate two, and she’s failed to recover. There are just too many candidates fielding socialist agendas for her to get past that beating. But we still need to pay attention to her.
Her priorities are no different than Sanders or Warren or Buttigieg, or the rest. One of which is a campaign to silence the speech of her political opponents. Something Democrat Socialists have been pursuing for years.
Add your name. That list would make for exciting reading. A collection of people who think it is a good idea to silence speech with which you disagree. Not realizing that once you give a person or a government that power, you are probably not getting it back. Not without a war. And absent that, they will come after you eventually. Speech police, hate speech, mandatory pronouns, fines for using the wrong words.
That future is today.
They are universally embraced by Democrat Party leaders. We have it in New Hampshire as well. Where Democrats (sometimes with help from Republicans) try to hide speech stomping legislation under the guise of ending discrimination, improving transparency, or getting money out of politics. Anyone who sells these lies is an idiot or a tyrant. There is no third option.
The first amendment exists to keep people like Kamala Harris or Deb Stevens or Jan Schmidt or Rosemarie Rung from using the government to silence words, ideas, or beliefs, with which they disagree.
Talk Talk Talk
Let them rant, I say. The more they talk, the easier it is to make our case. Democrats, however, cannot seem to take the same approach. They can’t even bring themselves to condemn intimidation and violence in the name of their agenda against others by groups like Antifa.
Put your thinking caps on and guess what that means if they are in power? History already tells you. State-sanctioned violence to suppress speech or, more likely, Democrat socialists looking the other way when proxy groups do the intimidating for them. Like the Mayor of Portland. Or the entire New Hampshire Democrat party. Who, to the best of my knowledge, has never condemned what Antifa does.
Calling everyone who dares to hold some other opinion a Nazi so that you can beat them up. Do you want to live in that world? That is their promise to you. They are not shy.
So, back to Harris. How appropriate is it that she is speaking at an event, and when she asks if America is ready for her campaign, the only voices you can hear, shout no. No, go away, or no, they are not ready for socialism.
Of course, when it comes, if it comes, no one in the audience would dare say no.
How ironic is that?
