Ah yes, Sandra Fluke – the gal that just keeps on giving…
Sidenote: and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and giving….oh, you get the picture. Not her, fer sure – but her Progressive attitude that screams “YOU OWE ME!!!”
…to us here at the ‘Grok – and we have yet to pay for her contraceptives (wonder if she’s ditched that stupendous free rider hubby of her’s that refused to provide for her himself). Romney may have been wrong about the 47%, but when Sandra Fluke whines that she expects the Government to force others to provide for her most intimate moments, he had it G-spot on. But the best summary has been given by Dr. Paul Rahe, on how radically Progressivism is changing the culture and the language:
The deepest source of our present discontents is the sexual revolution. Our abandonment of chastity as a norm has had dire political consequences. Her right to be promiscuous trumps our right to the fruits of our own labor.
Given the US Supreme Court decisions of Saturday and the anticipated ruling tomorrow on Hobby Lobby / Conestoga vs HHS Contraceptive mandate that may well determine if there is Religious Liberty (enumerated in the First Amendment) or has it been replaced by Entitlement of Sexual Need, Sandra decided that she needed to weigh in once again.
Any day now, #SupremeCourt decides whether corporations can deny women access to contraception. http://t.co/xZ247dqtMf
— Sandra Fluke (@SandraFluke) June 27, 2014
Once again, Mitt was right for she would never have voted for him – he, like all correctly minded folks, believe she should be providing for herself (and if not her, then her free riding husband). But she was not done there – yet another classic example of entitlement and language twisting that believes everyone should be responsible for YOU as well as a leap of logic that doesn’t seem to exist in any reality other than in Progressive nether regions (the site of their brains, for all the attention they give it):
TELL THE SUPREME COURT:
Protect women’s health care rights!
Any day now, the Supreme Court will announce its decision in the Hobby Lobby case. The case could have far-reaching implications for whether private companies can refuse to offer their employees’ health insurance with contraception coverage.
I still haven’t figured out why this should be a mandate – for all the feminist whimpering that Republicans should keep Government out of their bedrooms, Sandra Fluke goes to the DCCC (Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee) to have Government and the entire population of America to saunter right back in. Because nothing says “reproductive hardship” like having to plunk down a ten-spot at Walmart for their own pills
Plain and simple — A woman’s boss should not have a say in her health care decisions. No one’s boss should. The stakes are too high for us to be silent.
Nope, they shouldn’t; that should be between a lady, her ladyparts, and her doctor – so why DOES Sandra Fluke want Government involved in that decision and into her bedroom?
Please join Sandra Fluke and the DCCC and sign this petition declaring that a woman’s boss should not have a say in her health care decisions.
No, his only responsiblity is to become merely an extension and enabler (not meant in a positive way) of the Entitlement Society and pay for it for the people formerly described as “selfish“. Sandra Fluke and her fellow Progressive subverters wish to redefine “access” and “say” to be “you will pay for my needs” (regardless of my own ability to take care of myself) and that ” you will be silent and put out for me”.
(H/T: Daily Caller)
