This came over the transom a little bit ago:
tell me what your thoughts are regarding NYC paying for a group that comes to NH and gets space in the House Calendar as a “not for profit type group”? Is this not coercion of NY on the political system of NH? just a thought.
I thought was a pretty good question, so here is what I sent back for a response:
Well, it wasn’t NYC itself that paid for it – Bloomberg and a couple of other big donors are bankrolling MAIG. They may have reached out to Deputy Dawg Shurtleff (or v.v; not much matter which way it happened) and those two polls put it onto the calendar. Coercion? Not in my mind as Shurtleff and that other person are useful idiots at the least and willing participants most likely.
Outside influence on NH? Absolutely. Is it new? Hardly. Will it stop? Not much likely – NH, relatively speaking, has little money of its own. Thus, there will always be those in NH looking outward for folks to open the spigots where the hose ends in Concord. You can’t shut it off: money IS free speech (indirectly). We may wail about it on this issue and the Other Side will do so on other issues. Unfortunately, there will be no financial disarmament on either side in the near or mid-term future (if ever). Why?
Simple – human greed, be it money for capitalists or “Power Over Other Peoples Lives and Behaviors” for politicians and bureaucrats.



