Senator Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.), one of the chief apologists of the NSA domestic spying program, said on CBS’s Face the Nation that oaths are very serious, especially if you’re a would-be whistleblower. When asked about Edward Snowden, Feinstein said, “I don’t think this man is a whistleblower,” adding that he should have stayed and “faced the music.”
“He has taken an oath, and these oaths mean something,” she said.
True – and many are debating that very point – a blanket that stifles the exposure of malfeasance? Or one that say (I cannot believe I’m about to say this, again) “speak truth to power”. But I remind the long serving US Senator (Progressive – CA) of this (Matt 7:3):
And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
I do remember that she took an oath to defend the Constitution – a “higher calling” compared to that uttered by Snowden. That that would include:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.




