Gonzo journalism goes mainstream… media, that is.

In my daily perusal of news and stories both here in the Blogosphere and in real newspapers and magazines, I often come across a little jab here and there dissing the New Media, and blogs in particular. "It’s not real news," they say. "It’s all lies, halftruths, and slander, and ripe for unverified statements," say … Read more

Meanwhile, the Dragon rises?

As the new world war lurches forward with all eyes focused on the Islamofascist world, communist China continues its military modernization. Why? Who are they "defending" against? As we live in a world more completely run and maintained by high technology, as does our military, one has to wonder about the latest action by the Chinese … Read more

This day in history: Tet Offensive. Could it happen again?

January 30th, 1968 marked the start of the pivotal battle in the Viet Nam War, the notorious Tet Offensive. This is a column I wrote back in August ’04, reprinted in remembrance of this historical event many Americans overlook and forget. I only mention it briefly in the piece, but I think the potential for a scenario in some ways similar to Tet still exists– right here in the homeland… 

Exercising the First    by Doug Lambert

Got Imagination?

In the official report of the 9-11 Commission, one of the major concerns raised was that of a lack of imagination on the part of those whose job it is to think about such things. Page 346 of the report states, “Since the Pearl Harbor attack of 1941, the intelligence community has devoted generations of effort to understanding the problem of forestalling a surprise attack. Rigorous analytic methods were developed, focused in particular on the Soviet Union, and several leading practitioners within the intelligence community discussed them with us. These methods have been articulated in many ways, but almost all seem to have at least four elements in common: (1) think about how surprise attacks might be launched; (2) identify telltale indicators connected to the most dangerous possibilities; (3) where feasible, collect intelligence on these indicators; and (4) adopt defenses to deflect the most dangerous possibilities or at least trigger an earlier warning.” So what was the problem with this time tested system?
.
Section 11.1 of the report concludes: “The methods for detecting and then warning of surprise attack that the U.S. government had so painstakingly developed in the decades after Pearl Harbor did not fail; instead, they were not really tried. They were not employed to analyze the enemy that, as the twentieth century closed, was most likely to launch a surprise attack directly against the United States.” It seems that, after the end of the Cold War, everybody, including those who shouldn’t have, turned a blind eye to the dangers of the world. Nobody apparently saw anything but peace and love and happiness. America took a collective holiday from history, which ended on September 11th, 2001.
.
In the famous ancient Chinese text, “The Art of Warfare”, Sun-Tzu writes, “The ultimate skill in taking up a strategic position is to have no form. If your position is formless, the most carefully concealed spies will not be able to get a look at it, and the wisest counselors will not be able to lay plans against it.” The classic military guidebook reminds the reader that, “Warfare is the art of deceit. Therefore, when able, seem to be unable; when ready, seem unready; when nearby, seem far away; and when far away, seem near. …Attack where he is not prepared; go by way of places where it would never occur to him you would go.” Again from The 9-11 Commission Report: “We believe the 9/11 attacks revealed four kinds of failures: in imagination, policy, capabilities, and management.” Imagination.

Read more

What does Bush see in Putin’s eyes now?

I’m sure that Bush has had his eyes checked since he looked into Putin’s eyes and saw the soul of a good man. Surely now, what Bush saw was a reflection of his own heart and soul. The former(?) KGB man rules a government that is once again filling the world with a never-ending stream … Read more

A day that will live in infamy

The Wikipedia on the Pearl Harbor attack: “At 6:00 a.m. on December 7, the six Japanese carriers launched a first wave of 183 planes composed of torpedo bombers, dive-bombers, level bombers and fighters. The Japanese hit American ships and military installations at 7:53 a.m. They attacked military airfields and at the same time they hit the … Read more

UN approves another year of the “illegal occupation.”

Huh- what’s this? The UN has just unanimously approved another year of Bush’s "illegal occupation"?! But… it can’t be, can it? I thought we were standing alone as we "go it alone"? What gives? The AP reports: The U.N. Security Council voted unanimously Tuesday to extend the mandate of the 160,000-member multinational force in Iraq. … Read more

Another one bites the dust. And another one goes and another one goes…

Unfortunately, it looks official. The Nicaraguans have elected former Sandinista leader, and darling of the left, Daniel Ortega as their president. "Yeah- so what, Doug? Who really cares. The Cold War is over. The people of that country have spoken." True. Here is something from Reuters that reports exactly what worries me, keeping in mind … Read more

President’s Radio Address: “Real Consequences”

This week President Bush spoke of North Korea’s apparent detonation of a nuclear bomb. This is, of course, really bad news for the US and the rest of the world- the fact that one of the main members of the "Axis of Evil" now has such a weapon.
.
The president continues to push the "6-party" talks while his detractors want direct negotiations between the US and North Korea. Go figure- Bush, after getting lambasted for "going it alone" in various aspects of the new world war wants six nations (most of which are in the vicinity of the Korean peninsula) involved with the diplomatic efforts, while his political foes encourage a process that excludes all but the US. Thank God President Bush seemingly stays focused on the task at hand, and not his popularity as defined by the opposition…
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Earlier this week, the government of North Korea proclaimed to the world that it had conducted a successful nuclear weapons test. In response to North Korea’s provocative actions, America is working with our partners in the region and in the United Nations Security Council to ensure that there are serious repercussions for the North Korean regime.
.
North Korea has been pursuing nuclear weapons and defying its international commitments for years. In 1993, North Korea announced that it was withdrawing from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. The United States negotiated with North Korea and reached a bilateral agreement in 1994: North Korea committed to giving up its pursuit of nuclear weapons in exchange for help with peaceful nuclear power.
.
After I came to office, we discovered that North Korea had been violating this agreement for some time by continuing work on a covert nuclear weapons program. My administration confronted the North Korea regime with this evidence in 2002, and the North Koreans subsequently walked away from the 1994 agreement.
.

Read more

McCain: When he’s wrong, he’s wrong. When he’s right, he’s right. Today he’s right.

Anybody that knows me knows that I am generally p-o’d at John McCain for whatever cause he happens to be championing. Whether it’s stifling free speech with campaign finance "reform" or seemingly protecting the "rights" of terrorists, I regard him as more harm than good for many of the issues important to me. Many crusades upon which he embarks appear designed for publicity and to distance himself from policies of the Bush administration.
.
That being said, given the poor polling numbers that continue to dog President Bush, there may be- and it’s a big "may"- some "method to his madness." If large numbers of voters continue to allow themselves to be misled by the President’s detractors (main stream media, Democrats, etc.), the only way for any Republican to be successful in ’08 may be by being the "anti-Bush." Do I like this possibilty? No. In a perfect world, more people would wake up, see the soundness of the present administration’s overall strategy, and choose a candidate running a campaign based upon a continuation.
.
The world is not perfect.
.
McCain isn’t always wrong, either. He scored 2 positive points with me this week. First, he guest blogged at Captain’s Quarters (which, now that I think of it, earns him another point) on the North Korea situation. He did this nation a great service by reiterating the folly of the ’94 Clinton administration deal with the communist regime, helping people to recognize that mistake so that we don’t repeat it.
The worst thing we could do is accede to North Korea’s demand for bilateral talks. When has rewarding North Korea’s bad behavior ever gotten us anything more than worse behavior?
.
I would remind Senator Hillary Clinton and other Democrats critical of Bush Administration policies that the framework agreement her husband’s administration negotiated was a failure. The Koreans received millions in energy assistance. They diverted millions in food assistance to their military. And what did they do? They secretly enriched uranium.
.
Prior to the agreement, every single time the Clinton Administration warned the Koreans not to do something — not to kick out the IAEA inspectors, not to remove the fuel rods from their reactor — they did it. And they were rewarded every single time by the Clinton Administration with further talks. We had a carrots and no sticks policy that only encouraged bad behavior. When one carrot didn’t work, we offered another.
.
This isn’t just about North Korea. Iran is watching this test of the Council’s will, and our decisions will surely influence their response to demands that they cease their nuclear program. Now, we must, at long last, stop reinforcing failure with failure.
Amen! This is "straight talk" of the kind that I only wish was more common. What’s not to understand? What is surprising about this from McCain is that he followed it up with another correct statement on an important issue- the Iraqi front in the war. 

Read more

Don’t they know war is illegal?

On this date, August 28th, in 1928, the treaty making war "illegal" was signed: The Kellogg-Briand Pact. That’s right, that treaty, still considered to be in effect on this very day, officially outlaws war.
The website www.u-s-history.com tells us

Relations between the United States and France had cooled in the aftermath of World War I. A number of issues had driven the former allies apart, including:

  • residual tensions from hard bargaining and perceived double-dealing at Versailles;
  • the continuing effort of the U.S. to collect the full amount of war debts incurred by hard-pressed France;
  • the embarrassment felt by France because of being assigned a lesser naval role at the Washington Conference (1921);
  • the recent failure, regretted by both nations, of the Geneva Conference (1927).
An effort was made by French foreign minister Aristide Briand to warm-up relations between the two former allies. Columbia University professor James T. Shotwell met with Briand in France and suggested that a bilateral treaty be negotiated that would outlaw war between the two nations. Briand seized this idea and presented it in an open letter to the American people.

The Coolidge government, at least initially, was not interested in having its hand forced in diplomatic matters and offered no response. A few weeks later, Columbia President Nicholas Murray Butler sounded the same theme in a letter published in The New York Times. The press in New York and elsewhere began a drumbeat calling for the “outlawry of war.”

Even back then, the news media and their ideological comrades in acedemia espoused silly, utopian notions that failed in the face of reality.

Read more

GraniteGrok contributor discusses upcoming book project

Regular visitors to this blog should be familiar with the "And that’s the way it was" series of posts by our fellow contributer to the Grok, Ken G. Ken’s distant cousin, Henry Tilton Gorrell, a United Press International "war correspondent" who served in Europe from 1936 – 1945, wrote a series of memoirs from this experience. … Read more

How To End a War: Win. Happy A-Bomb Day!

This week’s events of 61 years ago should not go unnoticed, or unappreciated. On August 6th, 1945 and again on August 9th, the United States dropped atomic bombs on Japan. Prior to that, on July 26, 1945, the Allies, in setting the conditions for ending a war that they did not start, called for the unconditional surrender of the Japanese and their military forces. Absolutely fanatical, with a declared fight to the death, the Japanese refused. Years of war, and still, they would not stop. Then the bomb fell.
.
President Harry S. Truman, sworn to protect and uphold the Constitution and expected to do all possible to “provide for the common defense”, made the decision. The first atomic bomb fell on Hiroshima, Japan August 6th, 1945. In his address to the nation, Truman spoke:
“Sixteen hours ago an American airplane dropped one bomb on Hiroshima, an important Japanese Army base. That bomb had more power than 20,000 tons of TNT.”
.
“The Japanese began the war from the air at Pearl Harbor. They have been repaid manyfold. And the end is not yet.”
The bomb used in the attack, announced the President was
“an atomic bomb. It is a harnessing of the basic power of the universe. The force from which the sun draws its power has been loosed against those who brought war to the Far East.”
.
Imagine yourself to be alive at that time. Perhaps you were. I cannot believe that every American, to a person, would not have wanted their leaders to do EVERYTHING possible to end the war, and to make everybody safe. Imagine yourself a young GI at the time- twenty-something years old, training for yet more warfare. Having survived through to the end of the war in Europe, would you ultimately join those less fortunate, living only to see a later death in the Japanese theater? Imagine a young wife back in America- perhaps with children. What will happen to her husband? Where is their father? Imagine a mother. What will happen to her son? What of America’s brave soldiers? Will any survive the coming battles in the Pacific? Will they die storming through hellfire on the beach on some Pacific island, facing an enemy that will not stop? When will this war end? Then the first bomb fell.
.
The Commander-in Chief, again, from his speech to the Nation (and the World):
“We are now prepared to obliterate more rapidly and completely every productive enterprise the Japanese have above ground in any city. We shall destroy their docks, their factories, and their communications. Let there be no mistake; we shall completely destroy Japan’s power to make war. It was to spare the Japanese people from utter destruction that the ultimatum of July 26 was issued at Potsdam. Their leaders promptly rejected that ultimatum. If they do not now accept our terms they may expect a rain of ruin from the air, the like of which has never before been seen on this earth. Behind this air attack will follow sea and land forces in such numbers and power as they have not yet seen and with the fighting skill of which they are already well aware.”

Read more

The sissy-fication of War in the West – Part 1

As promised, here is the update to my Post "The changing nature of war, or is the West just starting to catch up?"  Of course, timing is everything and as I was typing, FOX News just switched to the Kofi Annan news conference.  They are also showing film from Israel military sources showing Hezbullah shooting … Read more

Share to...