Continuing on from Parts 1, 2, and 3 of the NHListens “visioning” meeting at the Meredith Plymouth Senior Center (NH). Thus far, the important takeaways that I have observed thus far:
- A strictly controlled meeting agenda of questions and issues
- A division of the prospective audience / attendees into “circles” consisting of about 10 people (remember that number)
- Paid “Facilitators” and “Scribes that are to guide the “conversations” and to “take notes” – in this case, paper easels
- The “Enforcer” – tasked with being the person who would argue with anyone that was challenging the narrative.
and a new one to add:
- The Enabler(s) – those folks that dribble in “talking points” during the discussion usually at the most opportune times to be “slick and smooth”
This seemed to emerge in Part 3 (2 minute mark) when Susan started in on talking about Smart Growth principles, caught herself, and started to label them as if they were traditional New Hamspshire ones (instead of being cooked up by “Planners” that know better then we how and where we should live – certainly NOT a Live Free or Die Sentiment, or a Liberty & Freedom one either). So, let’s return to my phrase: “and remember that number 10!“. Next up is Part 4 which starts to show another dynamic right off the bat – those that are perfectly fine with a forced collectivism concerning land use, community priorities, taxes, and services, and those that believe that the voters have things right:




The US House just finished it’s work on HR1, cleaning up after democrats who in 2010 abrogated yet another obligation when they found themselves incapable of writing the budget they really wanted right before an election.