News – Politics – Opinion – Podcasts
Yes, Anthony Weiner probably did tweet a picture of his Weiner to a college co-ed. He is arrogant enough. They are both adults. It’s not as if he cheated on his wife and lied to a grand jury about it. But the coverup by the left wing organs (sorry) is a glorious display of self-immolation.
We must know our enemies. The ground-troops for the regressive statists are being trained online HERE. These are the enablers for the political/government/ruling classes. There is much good to be learned about them in their "DFA Night School." These classes are designed to teach people to enable and grow a leviathan government with unlimited powers. Knowing their aims, tactics, and plans gives us … Read more
We don’t need no stinking budgets
Unemployment Application
Here’s a nice video to get you primed up and ready to de-fang a union near you. It’s all about ObamaScare and the Democrat-Crony Waiver wire. Unions, Democrats, Hypocrites, Together.
Remember all that stuff we didn’t have to have in the New Hampshire budget before 2006 when the democrats started piling it up into what has become our Billion dollar budget deficit? I don’t either. I’m not even sure what they spent it on which is why I am convinced I can do without it. All this caterwauling is clearly just cover for keeping the bloated bureaucracy alive so they can milk it for union campaign contributions.
(First a Note: This is not the picture in question. It’s better)
That’s the Yahoo! News headline. Hillary Edited Out of Iconic Photo. Though I’m not particularly concerned about that. I’m more interested in the media narrative about a staged photo. The word iconic keeps popping up as an adjective to describe this "piece of…history."
Well, Iconic is defined by dictionary dot com as…
-Adj,
1. relating to, resembling, or having the character of an icon.
2. (of memorial sculptures, esp those depicting athletes of ancient Greece) having a fixed conventional style.
OK. Not much to work with there. How about Icon then?
| — n | |
| 1. | Also: ikon a representation of Christ, the Virgin Mary, or a saint, esp one painted in oil on a wooden panel, depicted in a traditional Byzantine style and venerated in the Eastern Church |
| 2. | an image, picture, representation, etc |
| 3. | a person or thing regarded as a symbol of a belief, nation, community, or cultural movement |
| 4. | a person regarded as a sex symbol or as a symbol of the latest fashion trends |
| 5. | a pictorial representation of a facility available on a computer system, that enables the facility to be activated by means of a screen cursor rather than by a textual instruction |
Which of these five do you think the media is shooting for?
Given the direction of public education, I think we will have to amalgamate these into a common perception. Something that fits the modern, western, collective unconscious, or in this case the media narrative about the current administration. Iconic implies a historical moment of great importance destined to define our nation and it’s leaders (so -depicted) for generations to come. Think- Sputnik moment!
Well lets work with that.
The first step would be to advance a theory where government didn’t have its fingers in every single pie. If the state left more decisions to local and individual control there would be a lot less to debate, and less heated rhetoric, because it would be none of the political classes damn business.
Democrats are hypocrites. Need more proof, just look to Obama care, and the billions it has handed out to big business, Big Union business in particular Yes, a union is a huge business, one that donates tens of millions to democrats.
The Concord Monitor is reporting that Portsmouth businesswoman Joanne Dowdell intends to challenge former Congresspersonista Carol SEIU-Porter for a shot at Frank Guinta in 2012.
You should read the entire post by Greg Opelka here (Breitbart’s Big Journalism.com), because it is about the left wings tunnel vision on the racism narrative, but before you do that I wanted to share a snipped from that post that borders on brilliant. It is the kind of writing I aspire to (missing miserably and often) so when I find it I have to share it.
No Labels, the latest of many left wing funded efforts to drag the right into the middle and the middle leftward, is looking for you to help them spread their message. But before you drop your values, abandon your principles, and jump into the center, you might want to know something about their latest pitchman, or should I say woman, Catherine “Kiki” McLean.
Pelosi stood against reforming a bankrupt retirement scheme, and now she is taking the same tack here: Medicaid should not be reformed lest it appear as if it needs reform.
NH Journal is reporting more fear-mongering from the left, and from the usual suspects. Teri “Billion Dollar Deficit” Norelli (D- scaring women and children), is promising us that the Republican Budget will ‘put peoples lives at risk.
“Political Incivility is Not the New Hampshire Way” is the title of Jeanne Shaheen’s Op-Ed in the Morning Sunday News. I can only assume she is not familiar with her own State Democrat Party leadership, some of the people who have helped her get elected like Kathy Sullivan, and others; people who are on the record saying any number of uncivil things.
To the Editor:
Every child knows which parent to approach for permission to do something risky, expensive, inappropriate, or too impractical. The parent who says “No” is called “mean”, “uncaring“, “selfish”, etc.
Some marriages have problems because over-spending threatens financial disaster, e.g., eviction, inability to purchase real needs like food and health insurance. Sometimes one spouse stands up to avoid the disaster, slashes expenses, sells expensive toys, cancels unessential services, etc. Family members enjoying the excess spending may call these cuts “extreme” and the responsible parent “mean”, “uncaring“, “selfish”, etc.
Across our country city, state, and federal governments have recklessly over-spent and over-committed future spending.
So the democrats were prepared to shut it all down to defend one big, international rent seeker. To pigeonhole women’s health issues to sex parts and intercourse. And to defend a major campaign contributor (the abortion industry) at all costs? Using women’s vagina’s for cash? Doesn’t that make them a bunch of pimps?
Question: If consensual sex (without coercion) between any two adults is a protected right, (gay sex is defended on these grounds) does the state have a right to prohibit sex between adult relatives, regardless of how closely related?
