I saw this over at Betsy’s Page a couple of days ago – I just didn’t have the time to really review it then. I urge you to read it in its entirety as it shows examples of why just throwing money at a problem isn’t going to solve it. Continuing on with the current state of affairs, procedures, and staffing isn’t going to solve these quality problems either.
I have to admit – I may be taking our Education establishment to task here in my town of Gilford, but when I look at the amounts of money and the lack of results, putting things into context says Gilford ain’t so bad (but I will continue to "task" Gilford to reach for excellence).
All these parents is what they feel is best for their kids – a good education. They want the control back from the school system – they want institutions that can be held accountable.
Clint Bolick writes in the Wall Street Journal (subscription req’d) about a suit being filed in Newark, NJ seeking to give 60,000 students trapped in failing schools by giving their parents the money to transfer their children out of the horrible schools to attend schools of their choice.
Seeking to vindicate the state constitutional guarantee of a "thorough and efficient" education, the plaintiffs in Crawford v. Davy ask that children be allowed to leave public schools where fewer than half of the students pass the state math and language literacy assessments that measure educational proficiency; and that the parents of these children be permitted to take the pro rata share of the public money spent on their children, to seek better opportunities in other public or private schools. Supporting the families are three prominent New Jersey groups: the Black Ministers Council, the Latino Leadership Alliance, and Excellent Education for Everyone.
Sounds like groups that care more about students’ education than the public school teachers’ union.
Sounds familiar, right?