I’ve made the point a time-or-two that the same sex marriage debate was never about marriage unless by marriage you mean it’s destruction as an institution. Marriage is a leading cause of children and children are a leading cause of families, personal responsibility, and even a tendency toward more conservative principles. That is why the left has worked so hard to detach sex from child-bearing, marriage, or even love.
The Promise fulfilled
It is entirely appropriate that that we are having the religious debate, the freedom to hold and practice their most deeply held beliefs, versus the onslaught of secular liberalism that hates it. From Luke 24: 1Now upon the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came unto the sepulchre, bringing the … Read more
GrokTALK! With Phil Kerpen – Time to End Death Taxes
Phil Kerpen from American Commitment joins us to talk about Death Taxes, how popular repeal is, why there hasn’t been a vote on it for ten years, and what the chances are for reform in the coming months and years. Follow Phil on Twitter @Kerpen or American Commitment @AmerComm
Why do Establishment Republicans have a “but” when it comes to Religious Freedom? Eh, Gov. Pataki?
Gov Pataki on WMUR’s Closeup (4/5):
I agree completely with the idea that we have to protect peoples’ religious freedom. There’s no question about that. I quietly am, in my own way, deeply religious and I don’t want someone to tell me that I can’t practice my religion as I see fit. But on the other hand, this is America and when it comes to human rights, when it comes to treating people equally, I thought we got over that fight when Abraham Lincoln, the first Republican President, but apparently we have to continue to fight that fight and I’m happy to do that.
This is what happens when politicians want to straddle the fence on an issue: “on the other hand….”. The construct is always the same – “SURE, I’m in favor or <insert issue here> BUT!”. Some forget that they shouldn’t use “BUT!” – very obvious and when we hear it, we should know that whatever they JUST said is about to be thrown under the bus. Whatever they say AFTER is the ONLY thing they believe in to the point that they’ll vote for or support.
Matthew Dowd: icky Culture War this religious stuff – just shut up.
On This Week with George Stephanopolus (4/5) was another great example of an Establishment Republican, Matthew Dowd (Republican strategiest, according to This Week), of the absolute distaste of the Beltway R Elite not wanting even engage in anything that gets in the way of “we can’t make it smaller but we can manage Govt better” mantra, specifically “who CARES what’s in the First Amendment we say we support”:
Dowd: I think it makes it difficult when you get involved in a culture war. It makes it easier in a primary but more difficult in a general election where the country stands today. To me, the reason why this is both fascinating and sad, and disappointing, is it that these issues drop into the body politic and because there is this underlying boiling going on that we don’t see that drop in then everyone gets polarized. To me, the thing that disturbed me the most about this was that people couldn’t say: you could be a person of faith, who goes to church, prays to God, and tolerant and compassion at the same time.
In other words, it’s all about the W, period. Also, in other other words, Dowd hates the idea that the Republicans have to get involved in the Culture War at all. Worse,
Question: Destruction by the gay-rights movement: a victory?
Conor Friedersdorf: If I recorded audio proving their intent to discriminate against a hypothetical catering client and I gave the audio to you, would you post it on the Internet and encourage the general public to boycott, write nasty reviews, and drive them out of business, causing them to lay off their staff, lose their … Read more
Question: why does “a dark place” only apply in one direction?
Or is it that because the other way goes “against the presumed Narrative”? Shortly thereafter, Jeremy Peters of the New York Times was asked about the difference between the Indiana RFRA law as it was written and as it stood now. Peters decided to unveil the bigger issue with the RFRA laws themselves: “these laws look as if … Read more
Is Progressivism becoming our State Religion? Is bowing to it the admission price to the Public Square?
It is the duty of every man to render to the Creator such homage and such only as he believes to be acceptable to Him. This duty is precedent, both in order of time and in degree of obligation, to the claims of Civil Society.
It is important to note that Madison was making this case not in the context of arguing for permitting the free exercise of religion but rather in the context of arguing against the establishment of any religion by law. His point was that no one ought to be compelled to affirm as true a religious tenet he took to be false and that no one should be compelled to participate in a religious rite that violated his own understanding of his religious obligations.
Get 110% Back From Angie’s List
The Free market, like government, works best when the people paying are well informed. Erik Erikson – Red State Since Angie’s List does not want your business, you should cancel your membership like I did. After I cancelled, I found out that Angie’s List has a membership Bill of Rights.You can get back 110% of … Read more
GrokTALK! With Phil Kerpen – Time to End Death Taxes
Phil Kerpen from American Commitment joins us to talk about Death Taxes, how popular repeal is, why there hasn’t been a vote on it for ten years, and what the chances are for reform in the coming months and years. Follow Phil on Twitter @Kerpen or American Commitment @AmerComm
GrokTALK! Live Stream April 4th, 2015
Live stream for Saturday April 4th, 2015 from 8:30 am to 11 am EST . (Look for updates on Twitter @nhstevemacd or #GrokTALK ) Live broadcast by UstreamIf you don’t see it here, you can always watch it at USTREAM.tv here. Today on GrokTALK!; Phil Kerpen from American Commitment – Death Tax Repeal is … Read more
Notable Quote – DrewM
“But hey, Republicans are just throwing so-cons overboard because doing so will make them popular with other voters, right? Er, about that. Fiscal-cons and social-cons used to be in an uneasy alliance within the GOP. I think we are growing into a more comfortable alliance in telling Republicans to frak off.” Via Ace.mu.nu
GrokTALK! April 4th, 2015
This week our guests are Phil Kerpen from American Commitment, Ed Naile has a voter fraud update, Storm chaser Ron Moore joins us, Kimberly Morin calls in on what looks like a local crony bailout, and Mark Osbourne talks taxpayers and budgets v. Union pressure and intimidation. You can listen to the entire podcast here … Read more
Emblematic of our political process when Politicians don’t know from whence Rights flow
One guy is dead nuts on…and two aren’t even on the job site. Elected politicians that don’t understand our basic American philosophy? And then devolve into rank identity group victimhood shows the stunted level of political discourse. And you wonder about the partisanship when there IS no common ground to talk from: “…our culture has … Read more
For Power, Democrats Happily Sacrifice the American People and Our Constitution
Stalin reportedly said, “One death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic.” As experts of managing the media, Democrats can use the suffering of a few people to advance their power while diverting attention from the harm their policies inflict on most Americans.
In her letter of March 17 in the Laconia Daily Sun (laconiadailysun.com) June M. Huot makes fun of the fact that most Americans are harmed by illegal aliens because she thinks flooding our country with illegal aliens increases Democrat Party power.
Huot doesn’t care that illegal aliens take jobs and depress wages causing millions of Americans to struggle to support their families.
Huot doesn’t care that illegal alien children take public school resources away from American children reducing their chances for success in life. Nor is she concerned about the sick American children infected by illegal alien children.
Ben Shapiro on “The Fascist Left and Same-Sex Marriage”
On one side is the CEO of the world’s largest company, the president of the United States and a growing chunk of the Fortune 500. On the other side is a solo wedding photographer in New Mexico, a 70-year-old grandma florist in Washington and a few bakers.
One side wants the state to conscript the religious businesswomen and men into participating in ceremonies that violate their beliefs. The other side wants to make it possible for religious people to live their own lives according to their consciences. (Tim Carney, Washington Examiner)
Who should decisions be left up to – you, the free market, or Government?
Compulsory Unionization Transfers Power from Workers to Union Bosses and Politicians
Recent letters in the Laconia Daily Sun (laconiadailysun.com) from Tom Dawson (3/20 and 3/25) and Tony Boutin (3/26) address an important topic, Right-to-Works Laws. Dawson argues for compulsory unionization while Boutin argues for “Right-to-Work”.
Dawson makes the absurd claim that forcing workers to join unions empowers workers. Compulsory unionization doesn’t empower workers; it empowers union bosses and the politicians they support.
Progressives fight for compulsory unionization because most union leadership uses union funds to support Progressive politicians and their progressive political agenda.
In my youth, America was world leader in every aspect of industry, mining, manufacturing, transportation, etc. American industry provided most American families with comfortable lives on a single income. Yet as government increasingly grew and implemented progressive policies, new rules and regulations have greatly increased the cost of doing business making companies fail, reduce wages and/or cut jobs, or move jobs overseas. Jobs that provide high value products or services and thus support good wages have been eliminated increasingly leaving only jobs providing little value which only can provide low wages.
Well, I can play this game as well
As Steve points out, the hypocrisy is strong with the Left. Along with Apple, Angie’s List (who has been advertising heavily on TV as of late (at least in my local area) also decided to weigh in on the Indiana RFRA, saying that it would not continue with a planned $40 million expansion of their HQ. Curious, though, not even a whisper of pulling out of the other States that have similar laws on the books. After all, if you ACTUALLY read the RFRA law (which I did), it doesn’t do what Angie’s List claimed (or, pretty much most of the Left) but it decided
Sidenote: Again, hypocrisy of the Left – they were VERY happy to see Apple and A.L. to weigh in as “Corporate Citizens – but HATE the idea of Hobby Lobby having the same “personhood”?
to go along with the rhetoric anyways. So, if a company decides that it actively fights against my beliefs, I shall not do business with them:
