Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[Art.] 22. [Free Speech; Liberty of the Press.] Free speech and liberty of the press are essential to the security of freedom in a state: They ought, therefore, to be inviolably preserved.
Speech is speech – in the sight of the Founders, there was no “political” speech, there was no “hate” speech, there is no “hurtful” speech – merely speech. But certainly there are those that believe that THEY have the ability to limit the catagory of speech they don’t like simply because they use Political Correctness to add an adjective in front of “speech”. Certainly, NH Rebellion belongs to this coterie of constrainers.
Former NH Supreme Court Justice John Broderick and Daniel Weeks came on CLOSEUP last week to represent NH Rebellion – the group that leans more Democrat than Republican in that it is all about being all about overthrowing the Citizens United Supreme Court decision that finally took a common sense action in helping to restoring the true meaning of the First Amendment. Both said a couple of things with which I saw a twisting of the above inviolate foundational law of our Constitutional Republic:




