That’s what I overheard a few years ago at our town’s Deliberative Session between two teachers who I later found out were union leaders. OK, so they didn’t say that parenthetical phrase but as I have written before, the costs of our schools (all over the state) are far outstripping the growth in students. Sure, some districts do have some population increases but most are not. The upward costs are not being driven by those items that go directly to student – it is for ever-increasing teacher salaries.
I’ll ask: have you ever heard a union say “hey, we’ll take less because the kids need more paper, pens, pencils, art supplies, science supplies” and the like because it’s “for the children”? I will say that I never have but certainly I’ve heard the kvetching from taxpayers (unless they or a family member are drawing a paycheck from said districts) lamenting that while THEIR take-home pay goes down (generally healthcare, taxes, et al) it always seems they have to pay more to make the teachers “whole”. Fairness? Nope – that’s what unions do – rent-seek from others beyond what they otherwise could do.











