Which Is Worse – Their Presence or Their Absence?

by Skip

I’m referring to those Canadian truckers using their Big Rigs to make statements in various Canadian cities with Ottawa, Canada’s capital, being the main and first target.

They parked outside Parliament and blocked the streets and are blowing their horns. Then onto the bridges between Canada and America.

So, which is worse – their presence or their absence? The lines and question write themselves:

 

Lock up truckers - supply chain Wretchardthecat via Instapundit

 

And:

 

NEXT OBVIOUS MOVE: THE TRUCKERS TELL THE OTTAWA GOVERNMENT THAT IF THEY’RE FORCED TO LEAVE, THEY WON’T BE COMING BACK TO MAKE DELIVERIES:

 

These ordinary, blue-collar workers just want to do their jobs. So, they are doing things right out of the Saul Alinsky playbook because their Elected Representatives refused to listen to their pleas of no more Vax mandates. Saul Alinsky wanted more minorities working at O’Hare airport in Chicago – Mayor Daley refused.  So, Alinsky had his supporters use every seat and urinal to the closest bathrooms whenever a large jet arrived.

Yup, passengers and airport workers complained that they couldn’t relieve themselves and had to make it to bathrooms far away.  After long flights. Drinking.

Mayor Daley caved.

The Elites now, as with Daily, are not amused and have now called out the police to get their way – but six Canadian Province Premiers (having more brainpower than Prime Minister Trudeau have caved and removed their Vax and mask mandates.

And now the question is, are the Canadian Elites are starting to realize that the “cure” to clear the blockages may well be worse than the original problem? What can they do to the truckers if they are all out making deliveries all over – but just not to their cities?  Can’t fine / arrest / jail them now, can they?

They should have sided for Freedom and Liberty right off the bat.

Braveheart would approve of the Freedom Convoy!

(H/T: Instapundit here and here)

Share to...