The so-called experts among the climate consensus are so bad at guessing they couldn’t predict the winner of a one-horse race. We’ve killed a few digital forests reporting their failures, but now that the IPCC is ramped up climate fear, it’s time to do it some more.
Related:
As a reminder, they are lousy. None of their predictions have come to pass, which they then claim as a victory in the battle against climate change.
- A Late Earth Day Reminder – “Consensus” That Climate Cult Predictions Don’t Come True.
- Liberal Sneetches Said No Beaches And Other Things The Climateers Got Wrong
- A Decade of Climate Alarmist Swings and Misses (As in, No Hits, not One)
- Artist Fakes Historic Markers In Durham NH to Perpetuate Climate Fraud
- Climate: If The Science Is Settled, Why Do They Keep Changing It?
We’ve got over 100 posts like this, many duplicating bits of the others but all of them demonstrating that the political war machine promoting this crap is not interested in saving the planet unless you mean from free markets and class mobility.
The newest effort is more of the same, and as promised, we’re happy to give you yet another example of what the experts tell you and what actually happens HT – Tony Heller.
Large chunks of Manhattan were supposed to be underwater by 2018. That didn’t happen, nor will it as a result of any lifestyle you continue to enjoy. The former NASAhole wasn’t even close, and if we look at prediction by NOAA its’ bastard twin, we find similar failures.
At present, the NOAA projections compared to the actual tide readings from Battery Park at the tip of Manhattan look ridiculous.
And knowing what we know about their past inability to guess correctly – because they are using political science, not climate science, we can guess ourselves that their prediction will fail in epic fashion.
There is no acceleration. The rise continues to mimic the post-mini-ice-age changes, most of which result from geology, not SUV. And while they may think it possible, no amount of your money passing through their hands will change isostatic rebound.
It will, however, incentive more breathless fearmongering by local, national, and global agencies who need those funds to finance their ongoing inability to project anything about the actual climate.
As proof of that, check out this thread by Steve Milloy, who served on the Trump EPA transition team.
New IPCC report shows climate scientists struggling with failed predictions:
1. Catastrophic outcomes (e.g., ice sheet collapse) deemphasized.
2. But ramped up hysteria over slight (1.5C-2C) warming.
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) August 9, 2021
Failed climate predictions force IPCC to dial back hysteria in new report. For example:
1987 – James Hansen predicts global temp 3-4C higher by 2020
2020 – Global Temps only 0.44C higher.
New IPCC: https://t.co/epOeBwuK03
Wrong Again: https://t.co/N8aZRwkZyo pic.twitter.com/isTkxZVX6x
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) August 9, 2021
The new IPCC report doubles down on hysteria over exceeding its temp targets of 1.5C and 2C. https://t.co/epOeBwuK03
But those targets are NOT science-based.
Climategate revealed they were 'plucked out of thin air.'https://t.co/29oZi8m1y9
Just made-up hysteria. 5/ pic.twitter.com/w2A9uDogV8
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) August 9, 2021
Here's another classic climate alarmist blunder:
1986: EPA predicts 2 feet of sea level rise for Florida by 2020.
2020: Sea level rise + subsidence in South Florida since 1986 has been < 4 inches.
Wrong Again: https://t.co/N8aZRwkZyo
New IPPC report: https://t.co/ztKSuVaFRY pic.twitter.com/s8P6Ab3DyF
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) August 9, 2021
Because extreme predictions have obviously failed, the new IPCC report is trying to make a mountain out of a molehill (i.e., exceeding the 1.5C target).
But satellites show average temp is warming at a modest rate of 0.14C per decade. https://t.co/qLDYVDMstG
No big deal! 9/ pic.twitter.com/YTv70M7j01
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) August 9, 2021
Who can forget 'federal scientists' predicting that the Arctic would be ice-free by 2020?
Today Arctic ice ranges 6 million square kilometers. https://t.co/PUlKX3INL7
Wrong Again: https://t.co/N8aZRwkZyo
New IPCC report: https://t.co/ztKSuVaFRY 11/ pic.twitter.com/kf5el7vTto
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) August 9, 2021
IPCC says humans have (slightly) warmed the climate.
No doubt.
But the IPCC pretends warming is all emissions vs. urban heat island, land use and temperature manipulation.
Adjusting for urban heat island effect, warming disappears, per Roy Spencer. https://t.co/rqqR8bYCRK 13/ pic.twitter.com/5mbfvxpSL5
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) August 9, 2021
The new IPCC report fails to recognize slight warming & more CO2 have been great for humans & wildlife. https://t.co/epOeBwuK03
If not: Why are there so many of us? What is the planet so green? What are we growing more food than ever?
And the weather hasn't changed. 15/ pic.twitter.com/XWTbPnhgzC
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) August 9, 2021
And apologies for the duplicate tweet to get the final one in the thread – skip down one.
The WaPo evaluates past IPCC claims:
"The scientists were right."
Sorry. Cimate scientists have never been correct.
Check out the "Wrong Again" series: https://t.co/SbNcxMeGdQhttps://t.co/PZfu59l8MU @brady_dennis @sarahkaplan48
16/
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) August 9, 2021
It’s all smoke, mirrors, and fraud.