Defense Witness in Chauvin Trial Goes "Under the Knife" to Send Message to Future Expert Witnesses - Granite Grok

Defense Witness in Chauvin Trial Goes “Under the Knife” to Send Message to Future Expert Witnesses

RNC video Power Screen grab Tyranny has many forms

Intimidating a witness before or during a trial is illegal. It is not against the law to intimidate unnamed future witnesses at trials not yet held, so why not send them a message? Before you give testimony contrary to the Regime’s authorized messaging, there’s a price to pay.

 

Maryland officials will conduct an investigation of reports of deaths in police custody overseen by former state chief medical examiner Dr. David Fowler, who testified at trial that former Minneapolis officer Derek Chauvin was not responsible for the death of George Floyd.

 

Floyd was a mess with an overdose level of Fentanyl in his bloodstream. The message here is that he died in police custody, not because of it or how it went down. That’s not what the regime wanted to hear. It contradicts the approved narrative, challenges the desired outcome.

Related: George Floyd had 11 ng/mL of fentanyl in his blood – It can be Lethal at 5 ng/mL

You will be made to suffer, and everyone must see you suffer.

It is a standard terror tactic. General Flynn is familiar with these methods. So, is Donald Trump. The ruling class is currently trying out a version of that on the entire white population of America.

Other examples include, create a security nightmare. Get huge rowdy crowds to show up at events as protesters making it more difficult for venues to invite speakers or allow speech that dares unapproved themes or ideas.

Riot every time something happens that you can use to advance your political agenda or silence your opponent.

Make examples of people who speak up – for lack of a better term – out of turn. Lawfare them, intimidate them, ruin their careers, threaten a spouse or family member’s career. Threaten lives. End them.

Or, put a medical examiner through the wringer because his testimony was contrary to your talking points.

This is witness intimidation of a future kind. Send a message to everyone. Should you be asked or choose to give a potentially unpopular opinion, you do so at great risk.

The net effect is to chill the right to free speech, the free press, and the redress of grievances.

Simple mob tactics care of your so-called public servants and their bureaucratic bag men tasked by you with protecting the rights they are willfully taking away.

 

>