Masks vs. No Masks (Still) Equals No Damn COVID19 Difference

by
Steve MacDonald

Mask malarkey abounds as New Hampshire enters its extended mask mandate period. Our goofy mandate was renewed until March 26th despite ample evidence that we’d have the exact same results if we abandoned it.

Related: NH DOJ Has Page for COVID19 Scams But No Mention of Scams Run by State Government

A quick look at one state and the results of “positive daily cases” in counties with and without mask mandates proves the point that masks don’t work again (and again) (and again) (and again) (and again) (and again) (and again) (and again) (and again) (and a lot more of that here).

But back to today’s lesson.

 

Arizona Masks vs no masks no difference

 


Related: More Science That Says Kids Should All Be Back in School


Wow. I mean wow. Will you look at that. There is a difference. The mask mandate counties actually had more cases per million population. Not that this will impress anyone exercising a political agenda disguised as a public health benefit.

That’s what this is, you know. It is political suppression of free will at the expense of livelihoods and lives that never needed to be sacrificed.

Share the graph. People need to continue to be reminded.

Stop punishing healthy people.

Threat assessment table FB featured image. 1-17-21 png

H/T again to Tom Woods.

Author

  • Steve MacDonald

    Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, blogger, and a member of the Board of directors of The 603 Alliance. He is the owner of Grok Media LLC and the Managing Editor of GraniteGrok.com, a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, and a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

Share to...