Skip

With the advent of the US House Republicans caving into Paul Ryan’s demands in order to just get a new Speaker to replace John Boehner

Sidenote: why is it that Republicans hate to fight ANYone for principles?

Sidenote: except, of course, when it is Establishment fight TEA Party folks – then it seems the fight is more determined than against Democrats

this may be a bit passe, but still bears note.  What if a renegade left-of-center Republican (or just Establishment trying to deny conservatives a seat at the table?) did exact that – a “compromise” with those that hate limited government, self-responsibility principles? (Emphasis mine, reformatted):

If Republicans struggle in the coming weeks to unite around a candidate to become the next speaker of the House, some GOP lawmakers are warning that Democrats may be required to elect the winner. Though many Republicans would consider that to be a nightmare scenario, some centrists view it as a political necessity if a group of conservatives choose to reject the majority’s choice for speaker.

Read more

 California begins to reward residents who cut water use with rate increase to make up for lower water use.

…you get shafted for doing EXACTLY what they wanted.  Once again, we see Progressive Government proving that F.A. Hayek’s “The Fatal Conceit” true- that a single individual or committee canNOT ever know enough to be able to ably make decisions for hundreds of millions of people.

We’re already seeing this story play out in two other venues: cars and electricity.  DRIVE smaller calls, the environmentalists demanded – and normal folks said “go pound sand”.  So the environ-“let’s deindustrialize back to the Middle Ages”-mentalists joined with Progressives to use the force of Government to change the MPG standards to FORCE you to drive smaller, more efficient (and more dangerous – doubt me and you sit in your Fiat 500 as I T-bone you in my Suburban) tin-cans.  Sure, they get better MPG (as if that’s the only metric that counts – it is for them, however) but like all Progressives, they keep forgetting two little words:

Read more

Kim’s post on Jeb! making the decision to cut his staffers’ salaries brought a thought to my fingers:

Shot:

Jeb!: We’re making campaign staffing cuts, but it’s from a “position of strength”

Chaser:

Obama: President tells CBS’s Steve Kroft in interview previewed on-air Friday that Russian President Vladimir Putin’s moves into Syria are out of weakness, not strength

IAM confused – what is

Read more

Yep, National Debt Ceiling time again and we’ve seen this movie already.  Kelly Ayotte has a new bill (2/15) and Kim had a post on it here; US Senate sponsors are: “Mr. Portman (for himself, Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Lee, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Toomey)”.  By setting up “automatic” appropriations  to take effect if Congress can’t get its second act and responsibility together and actually passing legislation, it kicks in to save their collective butts for a job poorly done (i.e., setting the nation’s priorities via a budget) – it lapses their responsibilities (yes, again) and puts the government onto autopilot.

Tell me again – WHY then do we need Congress?  You have TWO jobs – protect Citizens from attack (and yes, I would say that includes a slow rolling invasion via open borders that you continue to allow) and figure out what to spend on and how to pay for it.

Yet, Kelly Ayotte is all cheerful like in absolutely miserable  radio ad being run by CommittmentsKeptNH (an org on which I wrote about here) and its funding PAC, ESAFund (formerly Ending Spending Action Fund, info here, here, here, here, here, and here).  I first saw this on TV – can’t track down the video but the radio ad transcript after the jump.

Read more

MITT ROMNEY: DEMISE OF LEGACY MEDIA EMPOWERING CONSERVATIVE ‘INSURGENTS,’ PREVENTING MORE ‘COLLABORATIVE ACTION’

Ugh…this post about Romney, divisiveness, Democrats, media, and Paul Ryan is wrong on so many levels….but that’s why I pay myself the big cents to wade through this slosh. Emphasis mine, reformatted:

Failed GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney lamented that the demise of traditional media is empowering Republican “insurgents” and preventing establishment Republicans from compromising more with Democrats.

Gak!  First thought – it was BECAUSE the traditional media that the Left didn’t appear to be all that Left in the first place.  Why?  There was no contrarian and competing media to present other views.  Homogenous was all you get – and all of the news anchors of the Big Three Networks were very much Liberals as well as the powerhouse print media.  It really wasn’t until Rush went and took talk radio over (from around 125 stations at the time to over 1500 today) that stalwart conservative views were heard on a wide basis.

Read more

We hear this from Obama’s Secretary of State about Israeli citizens arming themselves against the Palestinians that are attacking them in what is being called “the third intifatah” (emphasis mine, reformatted)

Secretary of State John Kerry told reporters today that Israel has a right to defend itself, but discouraged against “self-help” responses to random stabbing attacks from Palestinians.  Israeli authorities have encouraged citizens with gun permits to carry when they’re out and about, as they can possibly stop an attacker before police can get on the scene.

Of COURSE he did – American Liberals, of which Kerry is a Prime case, hate the idea that Force should be shared – FORCE should be the purview and monopoly of The State. Firearms should only be owned and used by agents of the State (note to Kerry – the reason why older Americans carry guns is that we can no longer carry cops on our backs). However, the Israelis seem to know better.  After all, they are THERE (versus their “Better” deigning from thousands of miles away) where the knives, guns, and cars are being used to injure, maim, and kill Jews.  They’ve already been through this – I hope they tell this blowhard to go pound sand (or rather, go wander around Gaza for a while – without his armed bodyguards):

Read more

That would be THIS post: So, will Frank Guinta (R-NH) vote for “open borders” Paul Ryan for US Speaker of the House?

I got a call from Guinta’s Chief of Staff, Jay.  I did think it a little bit amusing that he said “you could have called me” to which my rejoinder was “Not at around midnight, which is when that post went up”.  To make this a short post, let’s just say that that Frank is supposed to sit with Paul Ryan next week to “discuss issues”.  I asked a simple question: without the spaghgetti code of an omnibus type bill (re: a “Continuing Resolution” or CR, which may be coming up because the Republican majorities in the House AND Senate couldn’t get the job done of “regular order” appropriation / spending bills done) and simply on Principle, would Frank vote against Paul Ryan (R-WI) for Speaker of the US House (and third in line in the Presidency) for his open borders stance, given just the “overwhelming success” of the open borders we’ve had the last decade?

Read more

The national debt ceiling is maxed out and the vote is coming up on whether to increase it.  I’ve already heard / read that a bill may be getting ready that duplicates the Iran Nuke bill but for the debt – again, the Congress may totally toss out its power and responsibilities and hand Obama total control over increased spending and that Congress would have to have a 2/3rds vote NO to stop him (instead of CONGRESS determining what the spending should be and must decide YES with a majority).  Why bother having a Congress at all if all they are going to do is emasculate themselves simply to “have consensus and be able to govern” (note to idiots – that ain’t “governing”)?  Especially in light of what came out of the Dems’ Prez debate the other night for spending that would make Obama look like a piker?

Anyways, how will our NH Federal Delegation vote?

Read more