Email Doodlings – Voting for principle or voting for effect?

Sometimes, some of the better thoughts this ordinary schlub might have is "off the blog" and it is worthwhile to post some of them here.  Sometimes, it shows a reasonable line of thought, and sometimes, it is a stubbornness to not let something go to waste (after all, if I’m writing THERE, I’m not writing HERE).  Thus, as an engineer, I like "double-purposed". 

The comment from someone I respect greatly, who is supporting Dr. Ron Paul:

I will never vote for Obama. But I will also never vote for Romney.

Of course there was much more.  And my response (slightly edited) was:

And then the realpolitik of numbers comes into play – in which numbers are apolitical.  It simply comes down to numbers and this is the hardest part of the argument that I have had to come to terms with (since becoming politically involved).  We ALL hate the idea of having to "vote for the least worst" and in this example, it would be Romney over Obama.  Except, the commenter would not vote for Romney.

LIKE IT OR NOT, an "absent" vote is the ballot version of "silence is complicity" (that…

Read more

Facebook Doodlings – the nature of the President

I had written a while ago out of a frustration of Obama becoming the Imperial President that Richard Nixon was accused of, and of the seemingly walk down the path of The Rule of Law to the Rule of Man given the actions of the Executive Branch’s Departments and Agencies:

The President’s first job is to protect this country from attack within and without.

His second job is not to lead us to correct decisions, but to make sure that WE get to make the choices (and keep government out of our way).

Third job is – heck, if we can get one that will pay attention to the first two, I’d be happy….that second one will prove to be very tricky (all those politicians, you know…)

One of the first questions that came up is what to do when "we the people" wish to do something that would be currently unconsitutional.  

…if the PEOPLE wish to do something that is currently unconstitutional, there is a way to change the Constitution. But it is, however, hard to do by design – and I agree with that. Even so, it can be changed. Example – direct election of Senators. I myself now believe that to have been a dumb idea, as it severed the "States’ interest" and eliminated a check and balance (do you think that Medicaid would have ever passed with it, ripping States’ budgets apart?).

It seems, however, that Progressives (and others more interested in power and an ends to a means), often will side step that…

Read more

GrokTalk! Saturday July 2, 2011

Live Streaming local and National News with opinion you could only get from GraniteGrok. EMail: GrokTALK@GraniteGrok.com  or Call us!      603-524-7478    524-7478 This week, 9-11AM… Part Time Grokster "Columbus" will join us briefly to talk about his view of the Presidential Race thus far as well as a couple of other political topics. Harris Kenny, a … Read more

Rather lame, Steve Trombly of Planned Parenthood!

In today’s Laconia Daily Sun (P.10), we see an "advocacy" group, a "social services" organization, doing what most seem to do when their gravy train gets yanked – complain and hurt the ones they "serve".  Here, we see the titular head of Planned Parenthood of New England skewering innocents as "payback" to the NH Executive … Read more

GrokTV: Congressman Dr. Ron Paul (R-TX) house event

Last night, GraniteGrok was graciously allowed to video the event at the home of Barbara Aichinger in Gilford where Dr. Ron Paul spoke and answered a few questions. His opening remarks: He also took a number of questions from the crowd afterward:

GrokTV Special Interview: NH State Rep Mark Warden

At last nite’s event, I had the opportunity to corral Mark, a freshman NH State Representative, and ask him about his impressions concerning completing his first year as well as what the Legislature had accomplished:

GrokTV Special Interview: NH State Senator Jim Forsythe

At last nite’s event, I had the chance to pull Jim aside (who is also my State Senator and like Mark, a freshman legislator) and asked him as well what his impressions were on completing his first year as well as what the Senate had accomplished.

OK, Big Tent time – come on IN!

Congressman Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI) has just announced that he is going to be announcing his run for the Presidency on Saturday.  Other than appealing to the "Red Eye" crowd (a Fox news program hosted by Greg Guttfield and on which McCotter is a frequent guest due to his VERY dry wit). He knows the issues … Read more

They have no intentions of reining in spending

From Boortz: We’ll give the nod to the tax cheat Obama chose to run the IRS – the Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.  Geithner was testifying before the House Small Business Committee – not about how he cheated on his taxes – but on his boss’s plan to raise taxes on small businesses in this country … Read more

And they say that hate us because we are….huh?

Often, the claim is made that Islamofacists hate us because we are occupying their land – and neo-isolationists would have us believe that if we simply pulled out of Islamic countries (among others), peace and kumbaya would break out, and we could all just break bread together instead of heads and other body parts. I … Read more

Data Point – if we’re so slow, how can we use so much?

There are those that complain that other countries are FAR superior to the US in terms of Internet acceptance as well as local Internet speeds and coverage.  These arguments are especially vocal over at the FCC with the Net Neutrality brouhaha going on – Government MUST take over control, as we are behind! Over at … Read more

Public Financed Campaigns in NH? No? And Granny D walked all those miles – for nothing.

The Supreme Court of the United States has just declared that public financed funding is kaput: The Supreme Court has ruled taxpayer-funded campaign systems in which state governments compensate outspent candidates with more government funding unconstitutional. CNN reports, “A conservative 5-4 majority of justices on Monday said the law violated free speech, concluding the state … Read more

Third Circuit – Online speech by students cannot be treated the same as on campuss – NH & Federal Bullying laws at risk?

I do hope so.  I have had great concerns as School Administrations have incrementally increased their reach and control far from the schools from years ago to the point where it seems that the Edu-Industrial Complex believes it is responsible for their students (vs Parents for their own children).  Witness the growth of pre-school day-care, post-school day-care, breakfast / lunch / dinners provided 365/year, health clinics, abortions when needed, and daycare for the kids’ kids.  With the advent of the Bullying laws, that reach was extended to any speech any where in real space and cyberspace.

In effect, Parents were being stripped of control and responsibility in one action after another.  Who knew it would be the First Amendment and the Third District Court that may have broken that lock that was rusting shut on parents?

From FIRE, the "money line" and great Executive Summary:

Is there a place where a student can go that’s far enough away from school grounds to allow that student to speak freely online? Every single one of the 14 judges on that court said ‘yes.’

Background:  

Yesterday, the full court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued two simultaneous opinions to resolve how much control grade schools and high schools may exercise over their students’ off-campus, online speech. In Layshock v. Hermitage School District and J.S. v. Blue Mountain School District, the 14-judge court delivered two landmark victories for free speech, holding that school officials cannot "reach into a child’s home and control his/her actions there to the same extent that it can control that child when he/she participates in school sponsored activities." In the cases, two students had been disciplined for creating parody MySpace profiles mocking their respective principals. The Third Circuit held that schools cannot punish students’ online speech simply because it is vulgar, lewd, or offensive.

Excerpts:

The full Third Circuit convened en banc to resolve this conflicting in-circuit precedent. Yesterday, the court decided in both cases that schools may not punish online, off-campus speech to the same extent that they may when dealing with in-school speech. The court thus concluded that the Supreme Court decision in Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986), which held that a high school may suspend a student for "lewd, indecent, or offensive speech and conduct" when such behavior conflicts with "essential lessons of civil, mature conduct," is inapplicable to online speech created off campus

Read more

It’s like, well, burning money…or letting money collect dust…

"The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works — whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified."            – President Barack Obama, Inauguration, 1/20/09 This is not a sterling example of Goverment that … Read more

Notable Quote – Michael Graham

“As long as it’s easier for Whitey Bulger to bring illegal prescription drugs across the border from Mexico than it is for an elderly leukemia patient to go home to Michigan, forget it.” – Michael Graham (radio talk host and author of "That’s no mob, that’s my Mom!").   Whitey Bulger, the Boston mobster that … Read more

Well, this will not favorably dispose Steve towards Huntsman (heh!)

Updated and Bumped: someone (who shall remain nameless for now) decided to challenge me over my use of the words association, No Labels, McKinnon, and Huntsman.  So, here’s yet another association for Huntsman that may drive NH Conservatives crazy: When Huntsman took second spot in the Republican Leadership Conference straw poll last full week in … Read more

Share to...