Today, on the Morning Update, Donald Trump’s DOJ sued New Hampshire (and several other states) for refusing to cough up its voter rolls. The State AG is asking that the case be dismissed, insisting their voter rolls are clean, but we know they are not.
00:00 Federal Lawsuit on Voter Integrity
01:51 Election Integrity Challenges in New Hampshire
03:28 Privacy Concerns and Election Transparency
Watch on the ‘Grok Rumble Channel if the embedded video does not load.
Authors’ and Speakers’ opinions are their own and may not represent those of GraniteGrok.com’s sponsors, readers, authors, or advertisers.
Ep 162 Links:
- https://granitegrok.com/?s=Ballots%2BScanlon
- https://granitegrok.com/?s=Ballots%2BNH+AG
- https://granitegrok.com/author/drichard1
- https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71453646/united-states-v-nh-secretary-of-state/
- https://www.wmur.com/article/new-hampshire-motion-voter-data-lawsuit-41626/71043209
- https://granitegrok.com/blog/2022/11/nh-voter-confidence-committee-some-of-the-evidence-presented-might-blow-your-mind
- https://granitegrok.com/blog/2014/01/how-does-this-democrat-vote-fraud-grab-you
Transcript [lightly edited].
Welcome to your Friday, May 1st, 2026, morning update.
The federal Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against the state of New Hampshire, lots of states actually, in the interest of ensuring that federal elections occur with clean voter lists. Lots of states have protested. Several have successfully fended off the Department of Justice. New Hampshire is hoping to do the exact same thing, but I hope they fail. New Hampshire’s voter rolls are a mess. They think they’re clean. They claim they’re clean, but they’re not.
We have a lot of issues. We have ballot-handling chain of custody. It’s still a joke. We reported on the AG and the Secretary of State, suggesting that election officials intimidate people who want their ballots hand-counted. We have a book of election rules and practices, some of which do not appear to be supported by law or the state constitution.
‘Grok contributor Dan Richard has, for several years, used every single legal and constitutional means to seek redress on a matter of election integrity, and every branch of government has rebuked him, and now he has to go to the US Supreme Court in search of relief.
If you search GraniteGrok, you will find thousands of articles ⁓ about all sorts of things, double voters, illegal voters, election law violations, ballot integrity issues, machine counting issues, and hand counting issues.
Back in 22, the state created a voter integrity panel, and this committee was supposed to examine things and listen to people from the state. And some people told them some things, and they ignored them. So.
Utilizing the USPS permanent move request database between January 2018 and October 1, 2020, citizen investigators were able to find an incredible 3,300 plus votes cast by people who had permanently moved to another state and an additional 5600 plus votes cast by people who moved out of their town and elsewhere in the state of New Hampshire. People who left the state had votes cast in their name here, and people who left towns to vote in other towns had votes cast in the towns they no longer lived in. Clean voter rolls. Seriously.
One estimate suggests the state may have at a minimum 66,000 examples of this. People who just don’t live here anymore and haven’t for a while, but their names are still on the voter rolls, and people are voting for them. Maybe not all of them, but certainly some of them. 66,000 votes is a lot.
So it’s important if you’re thinking about clean elections.
I’ll give you one example. Democrat activist Caitlin Ann Legacki. She worked for Jeanne Shaheen on her Senate campaign in 2008. In 2012, somebody voted in her name in person in Manchester while she was working for Claire McCaskill in Missouri, and actually, I think on video at the time that that vote was cast. At least that day, there’s no way she did it.
There are thousands of examples like that. We’ve got plenty of voter fraud. And we’ve been trying to help expose it. And so are these people. And so is the Trump DOJ. They think your federal election should be fair and clean, legitimate, and people who claim to be privacy rights activists are saying no, that’s too much information
These are the same privacy rights activists who want digital ID, digital currency. They wanted vaccine passports, and they want extended background checks on the Second Amendment right to which you were born just don’t do anything like that when it comes to elections. You know, elections where people pass laws that infringe on those rights, that rob you of money that you earned with your own labor. No, we can’t have anybody controlling that.
So it’s pretty sketchy all the way around. And here’s one more bit of sketchy for you. The original hearing was set for 4/16. That was moved to 4/29. The media actually reported on that one. The 4/29 one was moved again, this time with no notice. Nobody reported on it. Nobody seems to have known about it. And now it’s May 26. Are they going to move it again?
And here’s a real good question.
If the privacy issue is so cut-and-dry, why all the delays? What’s the problem? And what’s with the sudden secrecy regarding the changing of the hearing dates? It’s all very suspicious. Something’s going on.
New Hampshire is doing everything it can to hide its dirty voter rules. And something needs to be done about it. Maybe it doesn’t have to be done at the federal level, but the hard part is finding enough people who give a damn to make sure that actually happens. That’s it for this week. We’ll be back on Monday.
Get More Morning Update Here! – Or watch it where you hang out on Spotify, TikTok, Rumble, YouTube, Instagram/Reels, and Steve’s Substack.
Follow ‘Grok on X – Rumble – Facebook – YouTube – Signal – Telegram
WE ARE READER-FUNDED – PLEASE DONATE
