Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act reads: “Simple justice requires that public funds, to which all taxpayers of all races [colors, and national origins] contribute, not be spent in any fashion which encourages, entrenches, subsidizes or results in racial [color or national origin] discrimination.”
Stanford
Quick Thought – Why Haven’t the Stanford Trustees Asked This Simple Question …
I was flabbergasted at how large that overhead number really is (emphasis mine). “HIGHER EDUCATION BUBBLE UPDATE: More Employees Than Students at Stanford: Give Each Student a Concierge!
Guy Whose Job Title Includes a ‘Harmful Word’ Admits, Stanford “May Have Missed The Mark” With Their ‘Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative’
Last week we shared news about the Stanford IT department speech police issuing a language guide. For the good of the community until they walked it back the next day (something about the backlash after the Wall Street Journal took it wide) /snicker.
Having Fun with the “Neurodivergents” That Created Stanford’s Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative
When UNH created its Bias-freeLanguage Guide, we wrote stories that went national. Then UNH President Mark Huddleston made it disappear and talked about the University’s commitment to free and open speech.
Katie Meyer’s Suicide Should Be Blamed on Michele Dauber, Stanford, and the Department of Ed’s Office of Civil Rights Under Catherine Lhamon
Stanford University has been sued for the wrongful death of a student: that of Soccer star Katie Meyer. Shortly after the suit was filed, Stanford Law Professor Michele Dauber who has prided herself on “ranting” on social media, deleted her Twitter handle.
The Stanford Review Introduces “Woke Watch”
This is unexpected. A prestigious institution of higher learning – one of many where #woke was crafted and released first upon matriculating morons and later the world, is concerned about the effects that might have on common sense.
New Study – Odds of Dying from COVID19 if You are 50-64 are 1 in 1.67 Million*
Stanford and UCLA wanted to know how many people you’d have to come into contact with before you might catch COVID19. They crunched data to determine the odds of contraction, if that would result in hospitalization, and then death. Per the Report, ‘actual risk may not align with public perceptions.’