Obama has unilaterally ended the Iraq war (hmmm, didn’t he rail against that “Cowboy Unilateralist” Bush for making decisions on his own?) and is on his way in doing the same in Afghanistan. And while I had some words about it here, this is not the thrust of this post. Instead, it is this:
Neo-cons have no problem sacrificing their own children to the war machine. That sounds harsh, but it’s the truth
It brought back a memory of something very similar – it ignited my ire by effective saying the same thing:
Finally, if you believe in this mission, whatever it really is, are you willing to die or send your children to die for it?
This time, it started off with a discussion back aways about Sarah Palin getting into the Primary race but quickly morphed from that to this and I never expected to hear that from a non-Liberal friend. In essence, the far Left and the far Right / Libertarian movement have met and in a very ugly fashion in accusing parents of willingly sending their kids to die for an ideology. This is wrong at several different levels and to be clear, made my blood pressure rise – so I started to answer:
espite the attitude and priorities of the more moderate-establishment (r)epublicans, and the snooty first family-checkbook wielding-GOP aristocracy in New Hampshire, the conservative/liberty movement shied away from running third party races in 2010. They did not split the party, or run as independents, though a few establishment (r)epublicans who lost their primaries did.