Liberal Women Pissed About Trump Win, Go On Sex Strike

by
Auntie Vaquser

Liberal women (some liberal women) think they can teach men a lesson. Men voted for Trump, and Trump won, so they are going to refuse to have sex with them. I’m assuming these are women who have sex with men, but the odds are high; it is a lot of women most men wouldn’t have sex with (some of whom just shaved their heads).

Let’s assume the former. How dumb are they? Years of Liberal policies have emasculated men, lowered their testosterone, and generally sowed a disinterest in coupling. Some men have even been convinced they are women. Are they holding out, too? How about the non-binary women (see also women with whom no one is having sex)? But I suppose it makes sense. Their entire lives are centered on sexuality, actively practiced or not, so it may be the only commodity with which they think they have currency.

Remember the 2019 Sex Strike? Same deal. Same lie.

So, the presumption that women’s reproductive rights are under threat leads some women to swear off sex with men. The single best way to avoid an unwanted pregnancy. Abstinence. Something verboten as a reproductive rights topic under every other circumstance. The right to not have sex is a right when it is a weapon. Good to know.

Lucy Control of womens bodies Linus if women controlled them abortions not needed Lucianne

Planned parenthood hit hardest? The 2019 “protest” was as misguided as its 2024 – dare I say – offspring? Unhinged, angry women are taking out their ignorance on the beta males with whom they surround themselves.

Mr Trump swept to victory in Tuesday’s presidential race that Democrats cast as a referendum on abortion rights and protections for women.

Some women are now threatening to punish men for voting for Trump, taking inspiration from a Korean feminist movement that vows to withhold sex from men in order to redefine the gender power balance.

Interest in the “4B movement” spiked since Kamala Harris’s defeat, with women sharing videos of themselves on social media pledging to commit to its four “no’s” — no sex, no dating or marriage and no having children with men — for the next four years…

Can we be brutally honest? Who thinks these sorts of people self-censoring themselves sexually from the gene pool is a bad idea? Who thinks they can actually do it? Four years. Weaponizing sex suggests you are already a fan and use it to manipulate men. How exactly are you going to go without it for four years? It seems unlikely, but it’s an excellent insider trading tip. Buy stock in sex toy manufacturers?

Back in the real world no one who loves women is upset about this because the protest is based on misinformation. The media, which lies constantly, has convinced some people that Donald Trump is going to ban abortion. Nothing could be further from the truth. Trump is on the record saying this is a state’s rights issue. Not Federal. States and the people in them should decide this, and that means he’s not letting Congress do anything to change that. He would veto any federal effort to act on the matter.

If the Democrat’s media stenographers know this (and they do), you might want to ask what else they would lie about or have. The answer is everything. But you go, girl. Give up sex (with men) – if you are having it to begin with – for the lie. But if you are refusing it to anyone who is not a beta male, they may decide to find a real woman who isn’t so easily fooled by paid professional lairs.

Author

  • Auntie Vaquser

    I was a Lying Dog-Faced Pony Soldier. Then I was a Browncoat fighting the tyranny of the Covidists and their Public Health Tyranny Alliance (Among other things). Now I'm just Auntie Vaquser.

Share to...