Seventeen States are Suing Obama over Executive Amnesty

Texas Governor-Elect Greg Abbott is leading a 17-state coalition in a lawsuit challenging the legality of President Obama’s plan to grant executive amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants currently residing within our borders.

There are three main parts to the lawsuit: first, that Obama’s Executive Action violates the power-limiting “Take Care” Clause of the Constitution; second, that the Administration ignored required rulemaking procedures; and third, that if allowed to go into effect, the order will “exacerbate the humanitarian crisis along the southern border, which will affect increased state investment in law enforcement, health care and education.”

…

The lawsuit was filed by Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin. You can read the complaint here.

Video…

Read more

Right now at the national level, there are two things driving the Right blogosphere: Jonathan Gruber and Obama’s extra-Constitutional Amnesty granting.  Neither of which have we been commenting on – frankly, we’ve adopted the “screw DC – save NH” outlook and our posting with the elections here in NH has shown that.  But while NH is uppermost, we can’t forget that what happens in DC does affect NH – the politics and the policies.  Certainly, there is a reason why we have been harping on Obamacare‘s Medicaid Expansion that has been put into place here in NH (yes, by Rogue Republicans) – Obamacare.

And without MIT Professor Jonathan Gruber (Ph.D, health economics), there may have not been an Obamacare at all. 

Read more

A couple of questions on Liberty – where does this fit within Bill O’Brien and his worldview?  How would this work within the Legislative leadership he wishes to hold?  Is it “the common good” that is overriding, or is it the lowest level that must be addressed – the Individual?  Two real world, important, and current issues that boil down to the fundamental question: who is more important?

Question 16: During your Speakership, big emphasis on Right To Work – the ability to go and earn a paycheck to support your family without having to join a union…do you think there would be favorability for a very simple bill, that we won’t go for Right To Work, but that the unions now have to collect their dues directly from their membership (no government intermediary between membership and the union leaders in deducting those dues)?

Question 17: Religious Liberty – Certainly we have seen over the last couple of years the problem of non-discrimination impinging the Right of Conscience (the Free Expression as espoused in the First Amendment). We are seeing that small business folks who say we cannot marry you, we cannot do this, we cannot do that it goes against our conscience to do that. The most major principle in this country this country was founded upon. We are seeing a lot of problems with that. People on the Conservative side are starting to say, not just on the religious standpoint, but is it the Proper Role of Government to tell its citizenry “This is how you should think even if it goes against your conscience”? We have seen several cases mandated not only to pay fines when they refused to act according to those things but told “you will take re-education classes, diversity classes (whatever other name you want to do that). Is it that something that you might take up here and it that necessary?

Read more

Two important questions having to do with the Proper Role of Government (State employees be able to lobby State legislators?) and the power of the Democrat PR Machine getting inside some Republicans’ heads.  That latter one would be the Democrat tactic of using Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals (Rule #12) against Bill O’Brien (especially it is clear that NH Voters rejected the Democrats’ sole campaign cry: “defeat O’Brien and his Budget!” – they WANT that budget else they’d have voted for more Democrats!)

• Question 11: Would the legislature consider requiring state agencies and employees to meet the same standards and requirements set for other lobbyists? Should state employees be beseeching The State against MY best interest using my money?
• Question 12: It is not on a specific issue; we’ve been hearing some real important points of where you stand on the spectrum of issues. For me, the elephant that’s in the room, on FB and the social media I’m heavily advocating for you, because I think you are the right guy at the right time and for the right job, there’s this theme out there that I think would be helpful to be addressed and if you could speak to it. That is the theme that, somehow, if the Republicans vote you in as Speaker of the House, it is going to be a bad election season in 2016 because it will mess up all the elections. I am hearing it throughout the spectrum, it is a talking point to me that seems to be a Democrat, frankly, in that we seemed to pick up the talking point. We’re talking like it’s Truth. So I have had a lot of people that are friends with me that have asked me this specific thing. They have asked me who I’m standing with and then they bring up that point. So, speak to that point, clear it up because I think it is disingenuous information.

Question 11                             Question 12

Previous Questions:

Read more

“Winning is only a precursor; it is what you do afterwards that is most important”

And we are not close to being done (close, but a coupla/few more posts).  This time, the plethora of areas where NH must be begged “Daddy, may I earn a living?” instead of just getting to the job of doing a job.  I also tried to go back to the meme that we are hearing from moderate and “only winning is important” Republicans – Bill O’Brien can’t win simply because Democrats hate him.  This is a reason?  Seriously?  Or is the real reason deeper than that?

Question 13: Speaking of bringing businesses to NH: we have a lot of certifications and licensing for businesses – cartels, I like to call them where you have to get permission from a certain group of people in order to operate your business in a certain way. How would you address that?

Question 14: Follow on to Jane’s question (Question 12): obviously the Democrats have tried to DEMONIZE you according to Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals (Rule #12, isolate, personalize, demonize). Ed

Read more

“Winning is only a precursor; it is what you do afterwards that is most important”

Aaaaallmost done – almost in asking Bill O’Brien questions about issues and philosophy as he campaigns for the NH Speaker of the House (election by the newly elected NH House Representatives this coming Tuesday).  A follow up question for Question 14 and another one on firearms:

• Question 14A: What comes to mind as you speak of that, there have been moderate Republicans that have excoriated US and nastily said “Go off and form your TEA Party – you’ll never win”. What I think you are getting to, and comment on this quickly, “Sure, we may not win but you, NH GOP, will certainly lose from getting rid of an important part of your base”. All I have to do is look at the top two of the ticket this time around who insulted the base, the conservative base. They took stances antithetical to that base, and they lost
• Question 15: Constitutional Carry. We have seen Democrats this past session do everything they can to rope in Second Amendment Rights. There is a movement amongst the the Conservative base to go from a “Shall Issue” to a Constitutional Carry where you don’t have to get ANY piece of paper from the Government as long as you have passed your NICS and you can lawfully own your firearm. Concealed or open carry; not a problem as we’ve seen that in Vermont. Would you be in favor of that?

Question 14A                                                                Question 15

Previous Questions:

Read more