JUST DO SOMETHING!
No, that is, in a lot of cases, the WRONG thing to do.
The only knock that I have on Tucker Carlson as an interviewer is that he allows his guests to talk over him especially when they are refusing to answer a pointed question that they know will ruin their narrative. Other than that, he does really well in getting the Liberal “I can beat Tucker at his own game” in either slipping up or making fools of themselves.
This is one of those latter cases. Richard Painter, law professor in Minnesota, was an “ethics” lawyer in the Bush Administration and it is clear that at least on the topic of guns, believes that Big Govt, especially the part with guns, should know every detail of your life if you own guns. And, truth be told, as a Progressive Republican, he’s no better than the Progressive Totalitarians like Democrat Diane Feinstein. In this case, it is clear that he doesn’t want ANYone to have them. Yet, this raving nitwit (don’t believe me? Just watch the whole thing) of a lawyer is absolutely fine with disregarding that whole “shall not be infringed” bit from our Bill of Rights:
OK, let’s parse and unwrap what he wants:
- Tired of “NRA blood money” funding politicians’ campaigns – DO SOMETHING!
- Fix our permissive gun laws and protect us – DO SOMETHING!
- Those of us that disagree with him have blood money on our hands
Is that last bit akin to being a “climate denier”? Those of us that don’t agree with him are morally bankrupt? That seems to be the standard M.O. – accuse their opponents on any issue of not just being wrong but morally corrupt – “Othering” those that simply disagree, especially those than can quote real facts that put their emotionally laden talking points to shame. His remedies?










