Last year, New Hampshire passed a law that added new protections against discrimination in publicly funded institutions like Public Schools. It protects kids from institutional racism, but Democrats have been lying about 24/7/365 since it passed.
With contentious school board elections on the horizon (at least for Granite Staters), it’s important for candidates and our New Media Militia Warriors on social media to know how to respond to the Let’s bullsh!t.
And by the Left, I mean Democrats, unions, some Republicans, and even Governor Sununu. They have all peddled BS to create momentum to repeal the protections.
Your number one ally in this fight is the language in the law which boiled down looks like this.
This new law makes it illegal to teach, train or advocate that a person, because of their membership in one or more identified group(s), is inherently either: (1) racist, sexist, or oppressive, consciously or unconsciously or (2) superior or inferior to people of another identified group.
That’s it.
Anyone who opposes it should be instructed to read the bill (Skip provides a slimmed-down version here). They can review the State FAQ, which debunks the Left’s lies.
But all you need is the quoted text above. This is an anti-discrimination law. You don’t need to get into CRT or any of that. This protection extends across all schools and curricula regardless of the source of that discrimination.
“This new law makes it illegal to teach, train or advocate that a person, because of their membership in one or more identified group(s), is inherently either: (1) racist, sexist, or oppressive, consciously or unconsciously or (2) superior or inferior to people of another identified group.”
Anyone who insists on opposing it should be challenged. Why do you want educators to tell students that they are superior or inferior to other students?
How is this not in violation of the existing anti-bullying law?
And why is that not racist or oppressive?
Why is it impossible to separate examples of persecution throughout history from targeting children in the classroom; based on age, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, race, creed, color, marital status, familial status, mental or physical disability, religion, or national origin?
And if that skill is beyond you, should you teach, run a school, or sit on a school board?
Probably not.
